Thanks to all of you replied. The compilation worked, with
-monly-2-regs.
BTW, my Linux distribution is RedHat 5.1 and gcc version is 2.7.2.3.
Now I've got ghc3.02 installed. What tests can I run? (neither
gmake check nor gmake runtests produce any result). I suppose
re-compiling the compiler
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shin-Cheng Mu)
Compiling GHC 3.02 for i386 Linux, the make process stops
at the point when compiling ghc/lib/posix/PosixProcPrim.lhs.
The error message generated is attached below.
I tried the patch suggested by Carl R. Witty (I'm not sure
whether it was to my
Hello!
Distribution changed to glasgow-haskell-users, because that's no
additional bug.
On Wed, Jul 29, 1998 at 07:05:59PM -0700, Shin-Cheng Mu wrote:
Thanks to all of you replied. The compilation worked, with
-monly-2-regs.
BTW, my Linux distribution is RedHat 5.1 and gcc version is
On 28-Jul-1998, Dominic Duggan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no difference between
f = let m1 = Mt [[0]] :: Matrix Int in mm m1 m1 m1
and
f = (m1 * m1) :: Matrix Int
aside from the convoluted way of providing the type annotation
Agreed.
(and the need in the former
To my request on Haskell-2
...
class (Ring r,AddGroup (m r)) = RightModule m r
where
cMul :: m r - r - m r
-- "vector" (m r) multiplied by "coefficient" r'
...
instance Ring r = RightModule r r where cMul = mul
Haskell rejects this `= RightModule r
I cannot find there the subject. Could you citate?
Sorry, it turns out I missed your point entirely.
class (Ring r,AddGroup (m r)) = RightModule m r where
cMul :: m r - r - m r
So here, m :: *-*
What you really want is to say
instance Ring r = RightModule (\t-t) r where
Let us continue with the suggestions for Haskell-2.
To my note
Obstacle 3:
`newtype' cannot derive all the instances automatically.
Thus, in our case, add (Id 1) (Id 2) is illegal.
...
why Haskell allows the `newtype' derivation only for the standard
classes? Why not support
