On Fri, May 28, 1999 at 04:00:27PM EST, Friedrich Dominicus wrote:
> I wrote before with my trouble understanding hugsIsEOF. But I don't have
> found a clean way just to write a cat. Can s.o give me a hand?
>
Hi,
You shouldn't need to use hugsIsEOF. Here's one possible
implementation of a sim
\begin{sarcasm}
Malcolm Wallace wrote:
> [...] all 1.3/1.4 code should be converted or thrown away.
HaXml? ;-))
> [...] so one compiler writer has no idea what another compiler writer
> is using,
"man grep" :-)
> [...] For another, you have chosen to use deliberately
> preprocessor directi
Simon Marlow wrote:
> [...] We (GHC) are compatible with hbc in this area I think - hbc
> defines __HASKELL1__=3 for Haskell 1.3, we define __HASKELL1__=5
> and __HASKELL98__.
Hmmm, I must have missed the equation Haskell 1.5 = Haskell 98
somehow...:-)
> [...] I don't see a problem with stan
Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> [...] C++ stores type information in the symbol to resolve overloading.
> Ghc might do a similar thing. Than again Haskell overloading is
> nothing like C++ overloading so maybe not.
There's nothing wrong with this kind of name mangling: When the library
is updated, the n
Sven Panne wrote:
>
> Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> > [...] C++ stores type information in the symbol to resolve overloading.
> > Ghc might do a similar thing. Than again Haskell overloading is
> > nothing like C++ overloading so maybe not.
>
> There's nothing wrong with this kind of name mangling: W
On Thu, May 27, 1999 at 03:51:57PM +0200, Sven Panne wrote:
> Using Haskell programs and libraries with different compilers and/or
> interpreters (or even with different versions of the same system!) is
> currently quite a frustrating experience. This is can be attributed to
> the following proble
Sven Panne writes:
> Using Haskell programs and libraries with different compilers and/or
> interpreters (or even with different versions of the same system!) is
> currently quite a frustrating experience.
I agree. And as the current maintainer of one of the Haskell systems,
I'd like to work bot
module Main ( main ) where
import IO
import System
main :: IO ()
main = do args <- getArgs
s <- case args of
[]-> getContents
[inF] -> readFile inF
_ -> fail "Sorry, only 0 or 1 args implemented"
putStr s
--KW 8-)
-
Hello!
On Fri, May 28, 1999 at 08:00:27AM +0200, Friedrich Dominicus wrote:
> I wrote before with my trouble understanding hugsIsEOF. But I don't have
> found a clean way just to write a cat. Can s.o give me a hand?
import System(getArgs)
file2stdout :: String {- filename -} -> IO ()
file2stdout
I wrote before with my trouble understanding hugsIsEOF. But I don't have
found a clean way just to write a cat. Can s.o give me a hand?
Regards
Friedrich
Picking up on a few of the points that Sven made:
>* There is no really portable way to level those language
> differences. IMHO, piping Haskell through cpp is a hack and has
> its own problems: nhc13 defines __HASKELL_98__, GHC
> __HASKELL98__;
> nhc13 defines __HASKELL__=3,
Sven Panne wrote:
>
>* If you upgrade your version of GHC, its libraries change in such a
> way that you have to recompile all your code: A compiler-generated
> entity (ds42, lvl1, tpl60, ...) from one version can mean quite a
> different thing in the next. Compare this with C
12 matches
Mail list logo
