written in Haskell. It is surely not Haskell for Haskell but
Haskell for the Rest of the World.
Elke Kasimir.
Software Development EsPresto AG
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Breite
On 27-Aug-2003 Nick Name wrote:
-- First of all, a simple auxiliary function, so everything is
-- tail recursive
safetailaux :: [b] - ([b] - Int) - [b]
Apropos tailrecursive: I have the following question in mind
for some time: Rabhi/Lapalmes book about functional-styled
algorithms mention
both find hi-modules feasible, I'll try out them in the next version.
Elke.
--
Elke Kasimir EsPresto AG
-
- Software Development-Breite Str. 30-31
Tel/Fax: +49-30-90 226-750/-760 10178
declaration and instance
implementation can be provided in separate modules.
Elke.
--
Elke Kasimir EsPresto AG
-
- Software Development-Breite Str. 30-31
Tel/Fax: +49-30-90 226-750/-760
currstate)
Is this the right way?
Cheers,
Elke
---
"If you have nothing to say, don't do it here..."
Elke Kasimir
Skalitzer Str. 79
10997 Berlin (Germany)
fon: +49 (030) 612 852 16
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
see: http://www.catmint.de/elke
for pgp public key see:
http://www.catmint.de/elk
On 16-Feb-2001 Manuel M. T. Chakravarty wrote:
Elke Kasimir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
(...)
[...proposal for standardised monad transformers...]
Personally, I would stick with the IO monad.
Beyound personal preference, in my case having an "own"
monad has some objective
getLine
compute c:l
But such a discussion has probably already been taken place some years
ago. It would be interesting for me to know the arguments that led to
the choice of "return" (and "do").
Elke.
---
"If you have nothing to say, do
then, again, I think that "standard framework" would make it easier for
users to create those instance declarations by themselves needed to combine
monad transformers from different sources.
Elke.
---
"If you have nothing to say, don't do it here..."
Elke Kasimir
Skalitzer Str. 79
10
classes
with implied memberships, for example declarations saying that "Foo is the class
of all types in scope for which somefoo :: ... is defined", or declarations
saying that "class Num is locally restricted to all instances of global Num
which also belong to Eq".
Elke.
---
---
"If you have nothing to say, don't do it here..."
Elke Kasimir
Skalitzer Str. 79
10997 Berlin (Germany)
fon: +49 (030) 612 852 16
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
see: http://www.catmint.de/elke
for pgp public key see:
http://www.catmint.de/elke/pgp_sign
tatement that follows it into a true one.
___
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
---
Elke Kasimir
Skalitzer Str. 79
10997 Berlin (Germany)
fon: +49 (030) 612 852 16
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
see: http://www.catmint.de/elke
for p
?
Just a thought... Would it be possible for a Haskell Compiler/
Interpreter to provide a "Green Card" for untyped lambda
calculus...?
Elke.
---
Elke Kasimir
Skalitzer Str. 79
10997 Berlin (Germany)
fon: +49 (030) 612 852 16
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
see: http://www.catmint.de/elk
;addrToInt"
imported from module "Addr" already defined in m
odule "AddrBits"
FIX: adding "hiding (addrToInt)" to import AddrBits
Best,
Elke.
---
Elke Kasimir
Skalitzer Str. 79
10997 Berlin (Germany)
fon: +49 (030) 612 852 16
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s
Hey!
Did anyone port TkHaskell to Linux system and/or
ghc 4.00 patchlevel 0 and/or hugs 1.4 and can give
me some hints?
The package i have is intended for ghc 2.0. Is
there a good reason to downgrade
before trying to install TkHaskell?
Thanks for any help,
Cheers,
Elke Kasimir. (Berlin
14 matches
Mail list logo
