Re: opting out of release-monitoring/Koschei

On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 22:08, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:21 AM Elliott Sales de Andrade > wrote: >> >> Since we appear to only update most things with Stackage, it makes >> sense to not have release monitoring enabled. I've largely

Re: opting out of release-monitoring/Koschei

Hi, On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 at 01:32, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > > I have thought for quite while it would be better for Haskell packages > to opt out of Koschei, since my impression is that for nearly all our Haskell > packages > Koschei doesn't really give us anything but a lot of failures, > so

ghc-cryptonite LTO failure on s390x

Hi, The build for ghc-cryptonite failed in the mass rebuild [1] and a later rebuild by me [2], but only on s390x. The failure appears to be LTO related. This doesn't appear to affect many other Haskell packages. (I've found one seemingly-related failure in ghc-haskell-src-exts [3].) Since it's

Re: GHC 8.4 Change proposal

Hi, On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 20:10, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > > Hi Haskell SIG, > > I just have prepared this Change proposal for F30: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GHC_8.4 > > Feedback is welcome, as well as offers of assistance if you are able to help. > It looks like there

Re: ghc82 and packages and f28 building update

On 27 January 2018 at 15:42, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > Hi, I have been busy quietly building Haskell packages for F28 in the > f28-ghc side repo. > > Overall it is going quite well but I have one serious packaging issue > which I think needs the packaging of the

Re: git-annex dependencies and co-maintainership

Hi Róman, Sorry, I meant to reply last week, but you now have commit access on all of the below packages. On 5 October 2017 at 21:12, Róman Joost <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote: > Dear Elliott, > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 03:58:20PM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > >

Re: git-annex dependencies and co-maintainership

Hi Róman On 27 September 2017 at 19:15, Róman Joost <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote: > Dear Elliott, > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:56:59PM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > As you may or may not have noticed, I've added about 50-60 new pa

git-annex dependencies and co-maintainership

Hi all, As you may or may not have noticed, I've added about 50-60 new packages for Haskell recently. These are all in the hopes of finally updating git-annex. I'm about 1 or 2 away from that goal now [1]. Since Haskell packages seem to be so intertwined, I don't think it's a good idea to be a

Re: Why does ghc-cryptohash build ghc-cryptonite and ghc-memory also?

ages in the long term, assuming the current detailed Package Review > workflow continues. > > I didn't understand from your mail what led you to post this question? > > Hope that helps, > > Jens > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Elliott Sales de Andrade < > quantum.anal..

Re: Haskell copr builds for F26 failing?

Hi Róman, There is a bug report discussing this issue here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467299 I have not found, or seen anyone claim to have, a workaround. ___ haskell mailing list -- haskell@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Fwd: Why does ghc-cryptohash build ghc-cryptonite and ghc-memory also?

Apologies if you receive this twice; I have forwarded this to the general list instead of the bugzilla list. Hello, The ghc-cryptohash packages builds both ghc-cryptonite and ghc-memory [1]. Why is this the case? I spent a long time trying to figure out where I was getting ghc-memory from when