On Wednesday 05 May 2004 04:46, Ben Lippmeier wrote:
http://www.haskell.org/libraries and look at how many seperate GUI
libraries there are - I counted 16 - then ask what made the developer
for the 16th one choose to start over.
The fact that the 16th one is a wxwindows binding justifies this
On May 3, 2004, at 5:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got an interesting task this week for my job. (Note that this
will undoubtably last for longer than a week). I'm evaluating several
high-level languages as development vehicles for our next suite of
applications. The languages I'm
I'm finding wxHaskell very nice, and a wxWidgets
binding is something many other advanced languages
don't have (even OCaml). The only downside is having a
'Hello World' GUI application with 7 Mb... but it runs
quite well and smooth once it's loaded.
---
[]s, Andrei de A. Formiga
---
David Roundy wrote:
I think that sounds like a good idea (not doing a GUI just yet) but would
recommend that perhaps you could do something pretty impure in terms of
file or directory browsing. That wouldn't involve going beyond the
standard libraries, but might give you some idea of the
On Wed, 5 May 2004, Frank Atanassow wrote:
Frankly, I think it's completely unrealistic to expect to be able to
fairly evaluate Haskell in 32 hours. As you noted yourself, Scheme and
Erlang, being strict, are much closer to conventional programming
languages than Haskell is, so it's easier to
In my quest for a fuse binding for Haskell, which I really need at the
moment, I have the following definition working:
module HSFuse {
interface stat{};
typedef int getattrT([string] char *,stat);
typedef struct fuseOps {
[ref] getattrT * getattr;
} fuseOps;
void
