hello cafe-istas --
for those of you who are into these things, a lot of the shootout programs are
suffering from make errors and thus do not have benchmarks.
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64q/haskell.php
best, ben
Begin forwarded message:
From: Don Stewart don...@gmail.com
Date: July
Are there plans a foot (or under fingers) to make a version of Haskell
that runs on the JVM?
--
--
Regards,
KC
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011, KC wrote:
Are there plans a foot (or under fingers) to make a version of Haskell
that runs on the JVM?
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/GHC:FAQ#Why_isn.27t_GHC_available_for_.NET_or_on_the_JVM.3F
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing
No, there aren't. At least none that I know of. Don Stewart did work
years ago on a JVM backend for GHC for his Bachelors thesis. You may
be able to find it online (I don't know the name, sorry.) This was
never integrated mainline however.
These questions have been asked many many times, but the
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 15:07 -0700, KC wrote:
A language that runs on the JVM or .NET has the advantage of Oracle
Microsoft making those layers more parallelizable.
On top of the answers you've got regarding whether this exists, let me
warn you against making assumptions like the above. There
Hiho - I'm the maintainer of the Mac installer for HP. I thought I'd
chime in a bit:
On Mac OS X, developer tools is essentially synonymous with Xcode.
That is, to get the set of standard utilities needed for development
on compiled executables (notably the binutils), you install Xcode.
True, it
Good Evening,
can anybody confirm that this implementation is somewhat faster
than the current benchmark (at expense of memory consumption)?
Cheers, Thorsten
On 30.07.2011 23:08, Ben wrote:
hello cafe-istas --
for those of you who are into these things, a lot of the shootout programs
are
