On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Conal Elliott co...@conal.net wrote:
I'm polling to see whether there are will and expertise to reboot graphics
and GUIs work in Haskell. I miss working on functional graphics and GUIs in
Haskell, as I've been blocked for several years (eight?) due to the
Cool. Thanks a lot for uploading this.
I have a question (and I confess that I haven't checked the link). How is
this related to or overlaps with cv-combinators?
Cheers
Ivan
On 28 September 2013 06:18, Arjun Comar nru...@gmail.com wrote:
After receiving feedback, I went ahead and split out
Hi Conal, hi café,
I'm currently devoting most of my time to this and plan to continue doing
so (in the form of a PhD and work via my company).
I've been working on a thorough review of the current status and a
comparative analysis (using a fairly demanding, well-known algorithm to
compare
No, these are unrelated. Cv-combinators hasn't really worked since OpenCV
2.0 waa released I believe.
On Sep 28, 2013 8:54 AM, Ivan Perez ivanperezdoming...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool. Thanks a lot for uploading this.
I have a question (and I confess that I haven't checked the link). How is
this
Dear all,
I am pleased to announce that our monthly Haskell meeting is scheduled
on Monday, 30th of September, 19h30 at Cafe Puck. If you plan to join,
please click the button at:
http://www.haskell-munich.de/dates
Our monthly meetings started on Thu, 29 Sept 2011, so this will be over
I think they do work. cv-combinators depends on HOpenCV, which depends on
OpenCV 2.0.
On 28 September 2013 16:03, Arjun Comar nru...@gmail.com wrote:
No, these are unrelated. Cv-combinators hasn't really worked since OpenCV
2.0 waa released I believe.
On Sep 28, 2013 8:54 AM, Ivan Perez
Hi all,
We all know and love Data.Foldable and are familiar with left folds and
right folds. But what you want in a parallel program is a balanced fold
over a tree. Fortunately, many of our datatypes (Sets, Maps) actually ARE
balanced trees. Hmm, but how do we expose that?
It seems like it
Fair enough, it's been two or three years since I tried to play with them.
Most of my work is in the raw bindings currently, which provide the C++ API
in Haskell, so much lower level that cv-combinators. If HOpenCV were to
incorporate parts of these bindings then cv-combinators would be able to
The people working on HOpenCV are very open to incorporating other's
programmer's patches. Maybe you can incorporate your changes to
cv-combinators? (Project's been halted since 2010, I'm sure they'll be very
happy to see that sb is contributing).
On 28 September 2013 19:13, Arjun Comar
I've been talking to Anthony Cowley who I think is the current maintainer
of HOpenCV and Ville Tirronen who has been developing the CV bindings.
Basically the consensus is that these raw bindings provide a new base to
work from, and it's worthwhile to rethink the API we provide with a fresh
start.
Jan Bracker wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am sorry to send this a second time. Someone hinted out that I would not
reach everybody on the mailing list through the Google Groups address. I
should have looked a bit more thoroughly.
The Google Summer of Code 2013 is over! My project to port the
To be clear, I am not the maintainer of HOpenCV. I have used a fork of that
library for experimenting with OpenCV interfaces over the past few years, and
written quite a few kloc using it in several robotics oriented projects with
computer vision needs. None of my experiments with HOpenCV are
Ahh, I misunderstood then. Who is currently maintaining the HOpenCV package
on Hackage?
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Anthony Cowley acow...@seas.upenn.eduwrote:
To be clear, I am not the maintainer of HOpenCV. I have used a fork of
that library for experimenting with OpenCV interfaces
Is it possible to change fonts? I have found that fonts (and shadows) have
a huge impact on the wow-factor of a plot. In fact, I could not help but
ask a speaker during a talk what font he used for a particular plot... it
just looked great!
I think all charts support setting a custom font
this is a funny trick, and it looks saner than the more general $ *
combinators.
i see many situations where i could use that to lift my own combinators,
or to replace the backticks (``) to lift the infix function.
thx
- marc
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. September 2013 um 21:51 Uhr
Von: Thiago Negri
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Ryan Newton rrnew...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
We all know and love Data.Foldable and are familiar with left folds and
right folds. But what you want in a parallel program is a balanced fold
over a tree. Fortunately, many of our datatypes (Sets, Maps)
16 matches
Mail list logo
