Hello Jeremy,
I'd also like to see GHC compiling for ARM bare metal. Honestly speaking
I've avoided Raspberry Pi, but rather settled on ARMv7. Side note:
BeagleBone is excellent for this as you get all the TI supported tools
together with JTAG debugging just for free from TI (including ARM
Hello,
rather than native GHC run on top of Android, I would recommend to have
a look at GHC HEAD and attempt to cross-compile to Android. On ghc-cvs@
mailing list I've seen some work done for cross-compiling to
QNX/BlackBerry OS 10 so I think Androind should be also doable with some
On 06/10/12 03:06 PM, Ben Gamari wrote:
Let the list know if you encounter any issues. I'll try to dust off my
own development environment once I get back to the states next week to
ensure that everything still works. I've been meaning to setup the
PandaBoard as a build slave as Karel's has been
On 04/ 9/12 01:03 AM, Francesco Mazzoli wrote:
No, it is not possible to build GHC without GHC. Building GHC on ARM is
going to be extremely tricky (I'm not sure anyone has ever done it).
It's not that tricky at the end. Just install LLVM 3.0 and some OS
supplied unregisterised GHC. Grab
On 04/ 9/12 10:35 AM, Graham Klyne wrote:
It ships with Debian, along with the full Haskell Platform built for ARM
and lots of other libraries. Other than speed, it's fine.
Hmmm... I wonder if it will squeeze onto a Raspberry Pi :)
It should, if not report a bug since I regularly test on
On 04/10/12 07:03 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
BTW, the other problem with Haskell on arm is that AFAIK there is no
ghci, and so also no Template Haskell, and so if you're writing Real
World utilities that you want to be maximally portable, this means you
have to avoid using an increasing number of
On 10/11/11 08:23 AM, Michael Snoyman wrote:
So for my use case, I don't care at all about interacting with Java
code, I simply want to be able to turn my existing Haskell code into a
JAR file. This seems like a much simpler undertaking, but I'm still
not aware of any way to get this to happen
Hello,
I'm trying to find out if it's possible to use Haskell data type
definition capability to define types and compile defined types into
other languages, for example into Google's protocol buffers data
definition language. So basically speaking I'm thinking about using
Haskell sub-set
/o considering TH now).
Thanks!
Karel
[1]:
http://book.realworldhaskell.org/read/defining-types-streamlining-functions.html
On 10/ 4/11 06:02 PM, Karel Gardas wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to find out if it's possible to use Haskell data type
definition capability to define types and compile
Forgotten note: GHC's Generics as described here:
http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/ghc-prim-0.2.0.0/GHC-Generics.html#t:Datatype
-- is not yet clear to me, I'm searching for more information about this
in the meantime...
Karel
On 10/ 4/11 08:33 PM, Karel Gardas wrote
Hello,
since there is no Haskell compiler/interpreter for JVM yet (considering
LambdaVM outdated), then the question for kind of Haskell replacement on
this platform is either CAL[1] or Frege[2]. I'd like to ask here those
who have used either of those languages for your experience with
On 09/28/11 12:47 AM, Anthony Cowley wrote:
I am not aware of as good a story for Arduino-level development. Atom
may be an appropriate foundation for such an effort, but I also hope
that we can get GHC ARM support sorted out, and then use platforms
like the forthcoming Raspberry Pi as the
On 09/28/11 10:42 AM, Yves Parès wrote:
So currently, it's okay to make Haskell code that targets Android
smartphones, the Beagleboard, the Raspberry Pi or the OpenPandora as long as
you use the development version of GHC?
No, it's not that easy. As cross-compiling is not working (yet!) then
Hi,
On 09/28/11 10:35 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 28.09.2011, 09:30 +0200 schrieb Karel Gardas:
Please note GHCi support is still missing...
which implies that Template Haskell does not work. So if you are
considering using TH in your library when it is avoidable, remember
On 09/28/11 11:06 AM, Yves Parès wrote:
This means not only kernel should be the same (w.r.t. its
API/functionality) but also standard libc and other runtime libraries.
Yes, this is what I understood. I wasn't talking about portable *binaries*,
just about the ARM platforms which were efficient
On 09/28/11 12:41 PM, Yves Parès wrote:
Yes, but compilation might be damn slow.
I forget about the SheevaPlugs (ARMv5 Kirkwood 1,2 GHz)! They are kind of
cheap for what they offer, it's a very nice embedded platform.
Yes, or you can even attempt to install some ARMv5 linux on ARMv7
platform.
Hello,
Stephen Blackheath, David Terei and me are working together on ARM
registerised port of GHC. The port is using LLVM as a code generator and
is kind of working already. (GHCi support still missing)
If you are curious and would like to try the code, please read last two
paragraphs
On 06/11/11 09:37 PM, Edward Z. Yang wrote:
Yes, the tree was broken for some time between yesterday and today, and you
appear to have gotten unlikely. It should have been fixed now, so you should
try again.
It's probably not fixed yet, since even last night build fails on
opensolaris
On 04/22/11 01:34 AM, Maciej Marcin Piechotka wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 21:29 +0100, Andrew Coppin wrote:
I'm sure this must be a VFAQ, but... There seems to be universal
agreement that Darcs is a nice idea, but is unsuitable for real
projects. Even GHC keeps talking about getting rid of
Hello Sergei!
nice to hear from you! In fact I've been dealing with this issue a
little bit and just fixed Adjustor issue myself and then just hour
before your email came I discovered your excellent gentoo patches! Kudos
to zygoloid for his excellent MBlock.h patch! Also you have saved my
Hello,
[sorry for cross-post, I assume Itanium interest is quite rare these
days so to grab attention of Itanium/Haskell people I send to both
haskell-cafe and ghc list]
I'd like to compile more recent than 6.8.2 GHC on itanium-linux system I
do have access to, but I'm kind of unlucky with
Hello,
please read:
http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/encrv/whats_happened_to_haskellorg_did_someone_forget/c19guw1
Thanks,
Karel
On 12/17/10 03:19 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 05:01:45PM +0300,
Eugene Kirpichovekirpic...@gmail.com wrote
a message of
On 11/12/10 04:37, Andy Stewart wrote:
Hi all,
I have write Simple Manual at http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Manatee
Enjoy! :)
Hello!
I'm trying to follow installation steps on OpenSolaris 2009.06, but glib
installation fails with:
$ cabal install --user glib
Resolving dependencies...
Hello,
from time to time request for Haskell running on top of Java's VM pops
on the haskell related mailing list and then usually dies off when
someone mentions that JDK does not have proper support for tail-calls. I
think haskell community might do something with this fact or at least
attempt
Hello,
as this is really friendly forum, I'd like to ask to perhaps solve my
wonder. From time to time I'm seeing people here recommending Scala as a
kind of replacement for non-existent Haskell on Java/JVM platform. My
wonder is: why the people here do not recommend CAL, which at least to
me,
On 08/08/10 01:44, Don Stewart wrote:
Only problem is rewriting the GHC runtime in Java... :-)
Perhaps I don't understand the problem domain correctly, but IMHO this
project was already once done in LambdaVM:
http://wiki.brianweb.net/LambdaVM/LambdaVM.
Karel
On 08/08/10 03:08, Mathew de Detrich wrote:
Well the other issue is of course that Android being available on a wide
variety of phones, not all of which run ARM (the phone I am about to get for
example has a custom built CPU), although I guess one could use a generic
ASM branch for mobile
Ryan Trinkle wrote:
Rick,
I know some work has been done on JVM - iirc, Don Stewart did some work back
in the day, www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~pls/thesis/dons-thesis.ps.gz, but I'm not
sure how comprehensive it is.
Is anyone else interested in JVM-based Haskell targets?
Hello,
certainly I am.
John A. De Goes wrote:
Go ahead sell your GPL application. I'll get your code, build the
application, and sell it for less than half of what you're selling it for.
How exactly will you make your money, then?
Ask RedHat how they make money from RHEL while Oracle and CentOS are
exact copies
Sorry for newcomer silly question, but where is the voting page located?
Thanks,
Karel
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
30 matches
Mail list logo
