of the linked-in
(and other such companies) top brass or other linkedin top level technical
staff, if you know them.
If anybody on this list is working for linkedin, then this mail is for you
too.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do_Not_Disturb_%28telecommunications%29
Thanks and regards,
-Damodar Kulkarni
What a surprise, I didn't know the real name of Haskell Cafe till date,
BUT today I came to know it: it is Minh Thu V.
linked in sucks ...
Thanks and regards,
-Damodar Kulkarni
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Kyle Hanson via LinkedIn
mem...@linkedin.com wrote:
[image: LinkedIn]
http
... as anyway they
themselves are asking for it and they are NOT relying on the Haskell's Num
typeclass for it.
Thanks and regards,
-Damodar Kulkarni
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Mike Meyer m...@mired.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:35 PM, damodar kulkarni kdamodar2...@gmail.com
wrote
?
If yes, how?
In general, programmers are **advised** not to base conditional branching
on tests for **equality** of two floating point values.
3. Is this particular behaviour GHC specific? (I am using GHC 6.12.1)
If there are references on this please share.
Thanks and regards,
-Damodar Kulkarni
and regards,
-Damodar Kulkarni
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Scott Lawrence byt...@gmail.com wrote:
On ghc 7.6.3:
Prelude 3.16227766016837956
3.1622776601683795
So if you specify a number with greater-than-available precision, it will
be truncated. This isn't an issue
Thanks and regards,
-Damodar Kulkarni
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Stijn van Drongelen rhym...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 6:17 PM, damodar kulkarni
kdamodar2...@gmail.comwrote:
Ok, let's say it is the effect of truncation. But then how do you explain
this?
Prelude sqrt 10.0
stupid.
What is really behind the Smalltalk's decision?
Thanks and regards,
-Damodar Kulkarni
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Richard A. O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nzwrote:
On 3/09/2013, at 5:17 PM, damodar kulkarni wrote:
I didn't want to clutter that thread so I am asking a question here
made by O'Keefe.
and what is the take of Haskell on this topic?
Thanks and regards,
-Damodar Kulkarni
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Thanks. I found the explanation given at the link quite useful in shedding
the confusion I had had.
Thanks and regards,
-Damodar Kulkarni
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Jason Dagit dag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:09 PM, damodar kulkarni
kdamodar2...@gmail.comwrote
community, properly defined?
In other words:
Where can I find a formal and precise definition of the term combinator,
as a term used by the Haskell community to describe something?
Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combinatory_logic
Thanks and regards,
-Damodar Kulkarni
they call Monad coproduct. The
paper titled Composing Monads Using Coproducts is here. [1]
I haven't understood it much till now, and it seems I will have to try real
hard to read this paper.
Ref.
[1] http://isi.uni-bremen.de/~cxl/habil/papers/icfp02.pdf
Thanks and regards,
-Damodar Kulkarni
am wrong)
I wonder, where and how the Monad transformers fit in here?
Thanks and regards,
-Damodar Kulkarni
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Mathijs Kwik math...@bluescreen303.nlwrote:
Thiago Negri evoh...@gmail.com writes:
I just stumbled upon the Applicative term.
Arrows are quite
concept?
It will help others to share *at least some amount of* of intuition
(analogy) the originator had had.
Are such thoughts documented in this case?
Thanks and regards,
-Damodar Kulkarni
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Richard A. O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nzwrote:
On 7/08/2013, at 2:10 PM
to the same word.
Haskell, being originated from _mathy_ people, we do get to _enjoy_ this
effect.
Having said this, it has actually helped me build a different type of
'intuition' for words and I do enjoy it.
Thanks and regards,
-Damodar Kulkarni
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Richard A. O'Keefe o
Hi,
Thanks for the clarification.
This is clearly depravity.
I am confused, in what sense this is depravity?
Damodar
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Albert Y. C. Lai tre...@vex.net wrote:
On 12-11-17 02:19 AM, damodar kulkarni wrote:
Let's see tthis:
Prelude :t 3 a
3 a :: (Num ([Char
@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
--
Thanks and regards,
-Damodar Kulkarni
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Hi,
The Monad class makes us define bind (=) and unit (return) for our monads.
Why the Kleisli composition (=) or (=) is not made a part of Monad
class instead of bind (=)?
Is there any historical reason behind this?
The bind (=) is not as elegant as (=), at least as I find it.
Am I missing
@Jake
In my opinion, this is not as nice as the do-notation version, but at
least it's compositional:
That's an important point you have made, as Haskellers value code
composition so much.
If code composition is the holy grail, why not encourage the monadic
code, too, to be compositional?
Hi cafe,
Where do Haskell and DPH stand in comparison to C/OpenMP w.r.t. graph
algorithms?
Are benchmarks for graph algorithms available for Haskell like the ones we
find at http://www.graphanalysis.org/benchmark/?
- Damodar
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing
It shows hackage down:
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/http://hackage.haskell.org/
- damodar
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:33 AM, C K Kashyap ckkash...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it just me or is Hackage indeed been going down more frequently of late?
Regards,
Kashyap
Hi,
Correct me if I am wrong, but by looking at the way the message is created,
I think, LinkedIn is acting a kind of spammer these days. Shall we lodge
protest against it as a community?
As an aside, can we not automatically delete all messages to haskell
mailing-lists whose from field contains
, damodar kulkarni kdamodar2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Note: google badly fails to search these functions identifiers.
http://symbolhound.com/
--
brandon s allbery allber...@gmail.com
wandering unix systems administrator (available) (412) 475-9364 vm/sms
Hi Cafe,
It seems, the function names in Haskell libs are not first-class objects,
AT LEAST when it comes to searching for them of the net!
I was trying to search for the following Haskell functions in the mailing
list archives. Here is a summary of the responses I have had from various
servers
Hi Gwern,
First of all, thanks for your patience.
I am willing to do administrator tasks.
4. ReCAPTCHA enabled for 'edits adding new, unrecognized external
links' - which is all of the spam.
This is already enabled.
I guess the problem may be due to
We could even have a report spam button on each page, and if enough
users click on it (for a given revision), the revision gets forwarded to a
moderator.
I think, this will be of real use, but should be used along with CAPTCHA
because then spammers may report spam for everything and anything
So a language is referentially transparent if replacing a sub-term with
another with the same denotation doesn't change the overall meaning?
But then isn't any language RT with a sufficiently cunning denotational
semantics? Or even a dumb one that gives each term a distinct denotation.
Any idea whether Martin Odersky has read this discussion?
Thanks and regards,
-Damodar Kulkarni
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Dominique Devriese
dominique.devri...@cs.kuleuven.be wrote:
2012/6/27 Tillmann Rendel ren...@informatik.uni-marburg.de:
MightyByte wrote:
Of course every
Hello,
Thanks for the post. It was very useful to me in getting some insight into
this set of concepts.
Also your others posts on C++ and FP are very useful.
Damodar
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Bartosz Milewski bart...@fpcomplete.comwrote:
I published a blog for C++ programmers about the
Hi,
We can define filter using foldr as under:
filter1 p = foldr (\x xs - (if (p x) then (x:xs) else xs)) []
Can we define filter using foldr but in pointfree style?
Thanks
-DM
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
Yes Hugs has a option +s but it counts some sort of reductions not exactly
the beta reductions.
Thanks.
-Damodar
2008/11/22 Adrian Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hugs has, afaik, a output reduction count option somewhere. At least it
had one the last time I used it.
- Adrian
Am 22.11.2008 um
30 matches
Mail list logo