On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Diego Souza wrote:
Hi,
currently when one install a cabal package it compiles it and then install
generated binaries. I wonder whether or not it would be useful to have
pre-compiled binaries as many package managers usually do (e.g. apt). I
often think that would save some
On 28 February 2010 01:55, Diego Souza dso...@bitforest.org wrote:
currently when one install a cabal package it compiles it and then install
generated binaries. I wonder whether or not it would be useful to have
pre-compiled binaries as many package managers usually do (e.g. apt). I
often
Am Sonntag 28 Februar 2010 23:20:00 schrieb Ivan Miljenovic:
/me really wishes people stopped thinking of Cabal as a package manager
/me really wishes there were package managers as useful and easy as Cabal
for things other than Haskell :D
___
Hi,
currently when one install a cabal package it compiles it and then install
generated binaries. I wonder whether or not it would be useful to have
pre-compiled binaries as many package managers usually do (e.g. apt). I
often think that would save some time on the expense of a busier hackage
Diego Souza wrote:
Hi,
currently when one install a cabal package it compiles it and then
install generated binaries. I wonder whether or not it would be useful
to have pre-compiled binaries as many package managers usually do
(e.g. apt). I often think that would save some time on the
Am Samstag 27 Februar 2010 16:39:27 schrieb Andrew Coppin:
Diego Souza wrote:
Hi,
currently when one install a cabal package it compiles it and then
install generated binaries. I wonder whether or not it would be useful
to have pre-compiled binaries as many package managers usually do
