On 17 September 2010 04:44, Peter Schmitz ps.hask...@gmail.com wrote:
This gets a little hilarious (but better to laugh than cry).
Well, I decided to try Parsec version 3 (i.e., 3.1.0) after all
[...]
I did cabal upgrade parsec, which went great.
[...]
(This is where I began laughing
Ivan,
Duncan,
Thank you both very much for your kind help and comments.
I'm really impressed with the quality of help at Haskell Cafe,
and Cabal really has worked great for me; I'll just avoid upgrade
in the future.
Anyone:
So, to get a clean start with my library situation I will delete my
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
Because Parsec-3 apparently still has some speed regressions compared
to Parsec-2 (I'm not qualified to note whether its design is slow or
if you have to use it differently to get good performance out of
This gets a little hilarious (but better to laugh than cry).
Well, I decided to try Parsec version 3 (i.e., 3.1.0) after all, and
edited my cabal config to include:
preference: parsec = 3
I did not include base = 4; hope that is not a problem.
I did cabal upgrade parsec, which went great.
It
Run ghc-pkg check, and do a cabal install --reinstall for all
packages that it says need to be rebuilt at the bottom.
On 17 September 2010 13:44, Peter Schmitz ps.hask...@gmail.com wrote:
This gets a little hilarious (but better to laugh than cry).
Well, I decided to try Parsec version 3
On 17 September 2010 13:52, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
Run ghc-pkg check, and do a cabal install --reinstall for all
packages that it says need to be rebuilt at the bottom.
Actually, I just re-read your post and you seem to have bigger problems...
The cause of the
Not that I'm having any problem with parsec 2.1.0.1, but I guess I
would like to install the latest (3.1.0), unless there is a reason
not to.
I can't seem to get Cabal to do so; thanks in advance for any help.
I don't understand part of the output from cabal install --dry-run
--reinstall -v
Parsec 3 is unloved by much of the community because it's evidently
slower than parsec 2. For this reason the community remains divided
over the two versions and cabal has special preferred versions of
particular packages. To force installation of parsec 3, over the
preferred parsec 2, you
On 16 September 2010 12:47, Peter Schmitz ps.hask...@gmail.com wrote:
Not that I'm having any problem with parsec 2.1.0.1, but I guess I
would like to install the latest (3.1.0), unless there is a reason
not to.
Because Parsec-3 apparently still has some speed regressions compared
to Parsec-2
Thomas,
Ivan,
Thanks much for the info.
-- Peter
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 September 2010 12:47, Peter Schmitz ps.hask...@gmail.com wrote:
Not that I'm having any problem with parsec 2.1.0.1, but I guess I
would like to
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Peter Schmitz ps.hask...@gmail.com wrote:
Not that I'm having any problem with parsec 2.1.0.1, but I guess I
would like to install the latest (3.1.0), unless there is a reason
not to.
I can't seem to get Cabal to do so; thanks in advance for any help.
I
Jason,
Thank you for the insights into Cabal. I am new to Parsec, and
relatively new to Cabal, and was not aware of the info that you (and
Thomas and Ivan) posted. Great help; thanks again.
I will probably stick with Cabal's default for the time being because
I don't have a compelling reason not
On 16 September 2010 13:52, Peter Schmitz ps.hask...@gmail.com wrote:
I will probably stick with Cabal's default for the time being because
I don't have a compelling reason not to, but it's good to know how
Cabal works.
Well, despite having a compatability API, Parsec-3 also has a
completely
13 matches
Mail list logo
