Hi,
I have been trying to use the State monad for concurrent applications
and came up with a little library.[1] My MState uses an IORef to
maintain the state between different threads. The library also offers a
simple way to fork off new threads using its own forkM function. This
function
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Nils Schweinsberg m...@n-sch.de wrote:
Hi,
I have been trying to use the State monad for concurrent applications and
came up with a little library.[1] My MState uses an IORef to maintain the
state between different threads. The library also offers a simple way
On 02.07.2010 20:05, Jason Dagit wrote:
In other words, don't be shy!
Ok, thanks for the reply! :) However, a question about haddock:
evalMState :: Forkable m
= MState t m a -- ^ Action to evaluate
- t -- ^ Initial state value
On Friday 02 July 2010 22:32:37, Nils Schweinsberg wrote:
On 02.07.2010 20:05, Jason Dagit wrote:
In other words, don't be shy!
Ok, thanks for the reply! :) However, a question about haddock:
evalMState :: Forkable m
= MState t m a -- ^ Action to evaluate
And here wo go. MState on hackage:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/mstate
My first hackage library. :)
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Daniel Fischer daniel.is.fisc...@web.de writes:
On Friday 02 July 2010 22:32:37, Nils Schweinsberg wrote:
On 02.07.2010 20:05, Jason Dagit wrote:
In other words, don't be shy!
Ok, thanks for the reply! :) However, a question about haddock:
evalMState :: Forkable m
=
On Saturday 03 July 2010 00:52:00, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
It's been fixed in the 2.7 release apparently (I haven't upgraded, so
I haven't checked that myself).
Speaking of which, haddock-2.7.* came with 6.12.1, I believe, but from
6.12.2 on, haddock's version number was back down to
Daniel Fischer daniel.is.fisc...@web.de writes:
On Saturday 03 July 2010 00:52:00, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
It's been fixed in the 2.7 release apparently (I haven't upgraded, so
I haven't checked that myself).
Speaking of which, haddock-2.7.* came with 6.12.1, I believe, but from
On Saturday 03 July 2010 01:36:11, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
No, 2.7 came out after 6.12.1 was released.
Yes, right. I had installed 2.7 on its own (to see whether a bug displaying
infix data constructors was fixed there) and misremembered. Still odd that
GHC ships with 2.6 long after 2.7
Daniel Fischer daniel.is.fisc...@web.de writes:
On Saturday 03 July 2010 01:36:11, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
No, 2.7 came out after 6.12.1 was released.
Yes, right. I had installed 2.7 on its own (to see whether a bug displaying
infix data constructors was fixed there) and
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Nils Schweinsberg m...@n-sch.de wrote:
And here wo go. MState on hackage:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/mstate
My first hackage library. :)
Awesome. I needed something like that once, too, down to the same type
signature for the fork function. Here's an
On 03.07.2010 03:27, Matthew Gruen wrote:
Awesome. I needed something like that once, too, down to the same type
signature for the fork function. Here's an instance from my code:
instance MonadFork (ReaderT s IO) where
fork newT = ask= liftIO . forkIO . runReaderT newT
I've added this
12 matches
Mail list logo
