On 03.07.2010 03:27, Matthew Gruen wrote:
Awesome. I needed something like that once, too, down to the same type
signature for the fork function. Here's an instance from my code:
instance MonadFork (ReaderT s IO) where
fork newT = ask>>= liftIO . forkIO . runReaderT newT
I've added this i
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Nils Schweinsberg wrote:
> And here wo go. MState on hackage:
>
> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/mstate
>
> My first hackage library. :)
Awesome. I needed something like that once, too, down to the same type
signature for the fork function. Here's an instance f
Daniel Fischer writes:
> On Saturday 03 July 2010 01:36:11, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
>>
>> No, 2.7 came out after 6.12.1 was released.
>
> Yes, right. I had installed 2.7 on its own (to see whether a bug displaying
> infix data constructors was fixed there) and misremembered. Still odd that
On Saturday 03 July 2010 01:36:11, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
>
> No, 2.7 came out after 6.12.1 was released.
Yes, right. I had installed 2.7 on its own (to see whether a bug displaying
infix data constructors was fixed there) and misremembered. Still odd that
GHC ships with 2.6 long after 2.7
Daniel Fischer writes:
> On Saturday 03 July 2010 00:52:00, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
>>
>> It's been fixed in the 2.7 release apparently (I haven't upgraded, so
>> I haven't checked that myself).
>
> Speaking of which, haddock-2.7.* came with 6.12.1, I believe, but from
> 6.12.2 on, haddock'
On Saturday 03 July 2010 00:52:00, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
>
> It's been fixed in the 2.7 release apparently (I haven't upgraded, so
> I haven't checked that myself).
Speaking of which, haddock-2.7.* came with 6.12.1, I believe, but from
6.12.2 on, haddock's version number was back down to 2
Daniel Fischer writes:
> On Friday 02 July 2010 22:32:37, Nils Schweinsberg wrote:
>> On 02.07.2010 20:05, Jason Dagit wrote:
>> > In other words, don't be shy!
>>
>> Ok, thanks for the reply! :) However, a question about haddock:
>>
>> evalMState :: Forkable m
>> => MState t
And here wo go. MState on hackage:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/mstate
My first hackage library. :)
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
On Friday 02 July 2010 22:32:37, Nils Schweinsberg wrote:
> On 02.07.2010 20:05, Jason Dagit wrote:
> > In other words, don't be shy!
>
> Ok, thanks for the reply! :) However, a question about haddock:
>
> evalMState :: Forkable m
> => MState t m a -- ^ Action to evaluate
On 02.07.2010 20:05, Jason Dagit wrote:
In other words, don't be shy!
Ok, thanks for the reply! :) However, a question about haddock:
evalMState :: Forkable m
=> MState t m a -- ^ Action to evaluate
-> t -- ^ Initial state value
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Nils Schweinsberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been trying to use the State monad for concurrent applications and
> came up with a little library.[1] My "MState" uses an IORef to maintain the
> state between different threads. The library also offers a simple way to
> f
Hi,
I have been trying to use the State monad for concurrent applications
and came up with a little library.[1] My "MState" uses an IORef to
maintain the state between different threads. The library also offers a
simple way to fork off new threads using its own "forkM" function. This
function
12 matches
Mail list logo
