[Haskell-cafe] Re: don't: a 'do' for comonads?

Donald Bruce Stewart wrote: As seen on #haskell, from an idea by Malcolm, 14:42 ?let top'n'tail = (pre++) . (++/pre) 14:42 lambdabot Defined. 14:43 dons L.top'n'tail foo me now 14:43 lambdabot prefoo me now/pre 14:43 mauke that reminds me, haskell needs don't

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: don't: a 'do' for comonads?

apfelmus: Donald Bruce Stewart wrote: As seen on #haskell, from an idea by Malcolm, 14:42 ?let top'n'tail = (pre++) . (++/pre) 14:42 lambdabot Defined. 14:43 dons L.top'n'tail foo me now 14:43 lambdabot prefoo me now/pre 14:43 mauke that reminds me,