On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:36:44PM -0800, John Millikin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 03:39, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote:
1. What to call files? I understand (C)WEB suggests using .w, and
that noweb uses .nw, what should I call anansi files?
I usually use .anansi, but it
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 01:05:06PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:36:44PM -0800, John Millikin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 03:39, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote:
1. What to call files? I understand (C)WEB suggests using .w, and
that noweb uses .nw, what
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 04:22, John Millikin jmilli...@gmail.com wrote:
Anansi is a preprocessor for literate programs, in the model of NoWeb
or nuweb. Literate programming allows both computer code and
documentation to be generated from a single unified source.
Home page: https://john
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 03:39, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote:
1. What to call files? I understand (C)WEB suggests using .w, and
that noweb uses .nw, what should I call anansi files?
I usually use .anansi, but it doesn't matter. You can use whatever
extensions you like, or even none
Anansi is a preprocessor for literate programs, in the model of NoWeb
or nuweb. Literate programming allows both computer code and
documentation to be generated from a single unified source.
Home page: https://john-millikin.com/software/anansi/
Hackage: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/anansi
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 17:10:07 -0400
aditya == aditya siram aditya.si...@gmail.com wrote:
aditya Unfortunately literate programming doesn't really have the tool
aditya support yet. I use emacs for Haskell development and loading
aditya Haskell code in to the REPL will be an issue if you're editing
Hello all,
Is literate programming something you guys actually do (I only know that Paul
Hudak does), or is it basically a nice idea from days gone by?
In case you do, then how do you do it? Do you use lhs2TeX or what? Do you
use bird style of full-blown LaTeX?
Does any of you use leksah? I
, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Martin Drautzburg
martin.drautzb...@web.de wrote:
Hello all,
Is literate programming something you guys actually do (I only know that
Paul
Hudak does), or is it basically a nice idea from days gone by?
In case you do, then how do you do it? Do you use lhs2TeX or what? Do you
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Martin Drautzburg martin.drautzb...@web.de
wrote:
Hello all,
Is literate programming something you guys actually do (I only know that
Paul
Hudak does), or is it basically a nice idea from days gone by?
In case you do, then how do you do it? Do you use
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:34:37PM -0400, aditya siram wrote:
It's weird I was just thinking about LP in Haskell this morning. Check out
John Milliken's dbus-core [1] written entirely in noweb. It is a pleasure to
read and I am seriously considering adopting the technique for my Haskell
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 09:21, Martin Drautzburg
martin.drautzb...@web.de wrote:
Is literate programming something you guys actually do (I only know that Paul
Hudak does), or is it basically a nice idea from days gone by?
I use it occasionally for large projects -- its usefulness seems
personal opionion as a haskell newbie is that I love literate programming.
I can write down my train of thoughts along with the source code, then I read
the generated document an I can find flaws in it much more easily than when
reading the bare source. I understand that this becomes less of an issue
and not achievable with
Literate Haskell.
I don't have any problems with LaTeX, but a less verbose solution would do
just fine.
You don't really need to know a lot of LaTex to use noweb. I'm no LaTex
expert and I found the source easy to read.
My biggest problem is actually literate programming
preference for literate programming with Haskell.
This is not true. You can't have for instance a HTML documentation mixed with
your source with just plain comments, style code blocks etc and only have to
maintain one source.
I'm writing my own preprocessor, designed for Haskell, though it's more
On 13 Jun 2010, at 08:33, John Millikin wrote:
Does any of you use leksah? I failed to see any support for literate
programming in leksah. It candies the backslashes in e.g.
\documentclass{article} to λdocumentclass{article}.
I've tried using Leksah, but it doesn't display tabs, which
Stefan == Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca writes:
Stefan In any case I've added a note to mention that all you need to do
Stefan is (setq haskell-font-lock-symbols t).
Thanks - nice refactoring for my emacs-haskell.el :-D
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour | Zagreb, Croatia | GPG key:
2009/1/27 Massimiliano Gubinelli m.gubine...@gmail.com:
Thanks, I know LyX. Of course this is mostly personal taste but I think
TeXmacs as a technically superior piece of software (even if it does not
seems so at first look) and moreover the idea is also to have interactive
sessions and I'm
G == Gour writes:
Massimiliano == Massimiliano Gubinelli m.gubine...@gmail.com writes:
Massimiliano As far as Haskell is concerned, a good interface, would
Massimiliano allow to bypass programs like lhs2tex or in general allow
Massimiliano for beautyful editing Of course not everyone
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Emacs#Unicodifying_symbols_.28Pretty_Lambda_for_Haskell-mode.29
I'm pretty sure this text wasn't there last time I looked, yet last time
I looked was already long after Haskell-mode integrated such a feature.
In any case I've added a note to mention that all you
Hi,
I would like to advertise TeXmacs (http://www.texmacs.org/) to the
Haskell comunity as a possible front-end for literate programming in Haskell
(and GHCI interaction). TeXmacs is a system which allows the production of
documents featuring high quality typesetting (comparable to TeX) and high
Massimiliano == Massimiliano Gubinelli m.gubine...@gmail.com writes:
Massimiliano Hi, I would like to advertise TeXmacs
Massimiliano (http://www.texmacs.org/) to the Haskell comunity as a
Massimiliano possible front-end for literate programming in Haskell
Massimiliano (and GHCI interaction
Gour-3 wrote:
Massimiliano == Massimiliano Gubinelli m.gubine...@gmail.com
writes:
Massimiliano Hi, I would like to advertise TeXmacs
Massimiliano (http://www.texmacs.org/) to the Haskell comunity as a
Massimiliano possible front-end for literate programming in Haskell
Massimiliano
Massimiliano == Massimiliano Gubinelli m.gubine...@gmail.com writes:
Massimiliano As far as Haskell is concerned, a good interface, would
Massimiliano allow to bypass programs like lhs2tex or in general allow
Massimiliano for beautyful editing Of course not everyone has
Massimiliano the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
2009/1/27 Gour :
Massimiliano == Massimiliano Gubinelli writes:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREKAAYFAkl/GoMACgkQvpDo5Pfl1oJc5ACeMb5om8j5Jn9Y5k7I0enXYcMY
1dUAn1D8TzKQ5URYVjvVl9XxdReGQ9QB
=umdo
-END PGP
,
max
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/WYSIWYG-literate-programming-tp21682184p21688863.html
Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http
Gubinelli wrote:
Hi,
I would like to advertise TeXmacs (http://www.texmacs.org/) to the
Haskell comunity as a possible front-end for literate programming in Haskell
(and GHCI interaction). TeXmacs is a system which allows the production of
documents featuring high quality typesetting
Mads == Mads Lindstrøm mads_lindstr...@yahoo.dk writes:
Mads I have never tried TexMacs, but newer versions of LyX do seem to
Mads have a more modern interface than TexMacs. I do not know have easy
Mads LyX is to modify to your needs though.
Right. And LyX has(had) support for literate
) support for literate programming.
Sincerely,
Gour
Thanks, I know LyX. Of course this is mostly personal taste but I think
TeXmacs as a technically superior piece of software (even if it does not
seems so at first look) and moreover the idea is also to have interactive
sessions and I'm
Hello Haskell Community,
Probably somebody else has already brought this issue up already.
Why can't we have some kind of integrated literate programming model
where I can I can have hyperlinks in comments to documents represented
in XML?? In other words, a kind of seamless literate
In the Haskell community is there a generally accepted best way to
approach Literate Programming? The language has support for literate
comments, but it seems that many common LP tools don't respect it.
I'm also very interested in this, but ideally I would want the output
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Tom Moertel wrote:
In the Haskell community is there a generally accepted best way to
approach Literate Programming? The language has support for literate
comments, but it seems that many common LP tools don't respect it.
I'm also very interested in this, but ideally I
and while probably useful, it'd be much more neat if
it could work out what functions actually were referenced. (And not
try to deduce types in comments!)
Anyway, my problem with literate programming is that I don't really
know what to put in there with the source code. Usage documentation?
Ex
related.
Second, I guess you could try to do a conservative type analysis to pick up
method uses whose instance is statically determined (as is often the case with
arithmetic operators) but I don't think that is something that should be
treated in a literate programming tool. For one thing, it means
33 matches
Mail list logo
