Something to consider is that it's not so much whether the material is
basic, advanced, or intermediate; it's that the way it's being presented is
boring and ineffective.
Take the Head First Java book, which was deliberately engineered to
overcome precisely this hitherto neglected aspect of
On 4 October 2012 18:04, Kim-Ee Yeoh k...@atamo.com wrote:
Something to consider is that it's not so much whether the material is
basic, advanced, or intermediate; it's that the way it's being presented is
boring and ineffective.
I'd suggest there is enough range in the Haskell books now
2012/10/4 Stephen Tetley stephen.tet...@gmail.com:
On 4 October 2012 18:04, Kim-Ee Yeoh k...@atamo.com wrote:
Something to consider is that it's not so much whether the material is
basic, advanced, or intermediate; it's that the way it's being presented is
boring and ineffective.
I'd suggest
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Stephen Tetley stephen.tet...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 October 2012 18:04, Kim-Ee Yeoh k...@atamo.com wrote:
Something to consider is that it's not so much whether the material is
basic, advanced, or intermediate; it's that the way it's being presented is
boring
Kristopher Micinski krismicin...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Stephen Tetley stephen.tet...@gmail.com
wrote:
As for an advanced book, maybe limiting the subject to one domain
(concurrency / DSLs for graphics / pick a favourite ...) might
make a better book than one targeting a
