Hello,I have modules that don't export some functions. Is there a way I can access them from ghci without exporting them?Thanks-John
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
[...]
While we're here we should fix:
chameneos
And anything else you want to take a
look at.
A community page has been set up to
which you can submit improved entries:
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Great_language_shootout
[...]
Well, then!
I've
tpledger:
Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
[...]
While we're here we should fix:
chameneos
And anything else you want to take a
look at.
A community page has been set up to
which you can submit improved entries:
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Great_language_shootout
[...]
Hello Duncan,
Monday, November 13, 2006, 3:36:32 AM, you wrote:
afaik, there are just two good enough libs - wxHaskell and GtkHs. can
in brief, i see the following main differences:
- wxHaskell is easier to understand and to use, Ght2Hs allows to use
Glade to develop lookfeel
- Gtk2Hs had
Hi,
Am Montag, den 13.11.2006, 21:24 +1100 schrieb John Ky:
I have modules that don't export some functions. Is there a way I can
access them from ghci without exporting them?
It seems that if there are .hi files around, ghci can’t reach the
non-exported functions, but if you delete this
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 15:41 +0300, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Duncan,
Monday, November 13, 2006, 3:36:32 AM, you wrote:
afaik, there are just two good enough libs - wxHaskell and GtkHs. can
in brief, i see the following main differences:
- wxHaskell is easier to understand and to
Hi
- Gtk2Hs had better support, but now wxHaskell has more maintainers and
situation may change to opposite in a next few months
As long as Duncan is around, there will always be enough Gtk2Hs
support! Currently Gtk2Hs _has_ better support, the situation may
change or may not. Remember that
Cale Gibbard wrote:
On 22/10/06, Chad Scherrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I had posted this question a while back, but I think it was in the
middle of another discussion, and I never did get a reply. Do we
really need both Control.Parallel.Strategies.rnf and deepSeq? Should
we not always
Hello Duncan,
Monday, November 13, 2006, 4:10:03 PM, you wrote:
on the download page only GHC 6.4.1 support mentioned. is 6.4.2 and
6.6 supported on windows? on linux? where i can read about forthcoming
gtk2hs version and when it will be released?
--
Best regards,
Bulat
Hello Neil,
Monday, November 13, 2006, 4:43:59 PM, you wrote:
The full source code of GuiHaskell is available.
i will at it too
The one thing you should be aware of is that Windows + Threading +
Gtk2Hs + Gtk + GHC = Pain.
why? are you tried to call Gtk2Hs from only one thread?
--
Best
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006, David House wrote:
On 11/11/06, Aditya Siram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
subOne :: [Integer] - [Integer]
subOne = map (- 1)
The short answer is that this is interpreted as negative unity, rather
than a section of binary minus. There are two common workarounds:
Hi Bulat,
http://haskell.org/~duncan/gtk2hs/gtk2hs-0.9.10.exe
That's the most recent Gtk2Hs for 6.4.2.
The one thing you should be aware of is that Windows + Threading +
Gtk2Hs + Gtk + GHC = Pain.
why? are you tried to call Gtk2Hs from only one thread?
I think so, yes. Or there are
Hello Neil,
Monday, November 13, 2006, 5:06:02 PM, you wrote:
http://haskell.org/~duncan/gtk2hs/gtk2hs-0.9.10.exe
That's the most recent Gtk2Hs for 6.4.2.
the http://haskell.org/gtk2hs/download/ page says that gtk2hs is
available only for 6.4.1
The one thing you should be aware of is
Bulat Ziganshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
of remaining, Ubuntu has widest support here while SuSe is favourite
of my friend. one thing that i like in suse is that it uses the same
RPMs as RedHat and RPMs is widely used for packaging software
available via internet. Is Ubuntu supports RPMs
Yes, but I wouldn't recommend installing rpms in debian-based system
(although, it can work perfectly). GHC 6.6 is in Debian unstable
(and should be in Ubuntu 6.10 or development branch). Ubuntu universe
repositiry is automatically updated from Debian repos thus being
one of the largest repos for
On linux you should use your package manager (whenever possible), not binaries
from the site (or compile it yourself).
--
WBR,
Max Vasin.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Max Vasin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, but I wouldn't recommend installing rpms in debian-based system
(although, it can work perfectly). GHC 6.6 is in Debian unstable
(and should be in Ubuntu 6.10 or development branch). Ubuntu universe
repositiry is automatically updated from Debian repos
Hallo,
On 11/13/06, Mark T.B. Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How up to date will Debian unstable's GHC be kept, though? It seems
pretty good at the moment, but there have been times when we've had to
install from source instead of via Debian earlier this year so that we
had GHC features and
On 13.11.2006 16:48 Pepe Iborra wrote:
Hi Valentin
Please, take a look at the Haskell Wiki page for debugging.
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Debugging
You will find that thanks to Neil Mitchell there is a Windows version
of Hat available. Perhaps you can add your experiences with it if it
On 11/13/06, Bulat Ziganshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Neil,
Monday, November 13, 2006, 5:06:02 PM, you wrote:
http://haskell.org/~duncan/gtk2hs/gtk2hs-0.9.10.exe
That's the most recent Gtk2Hs for 6.4.2.
the http://haskell.org/gtk2hs/download/ page says that gtk2hs is
available only
Can you manage to compile GHC under Windows? Compiling GHC under
Windows is known to be a bit tricky and time consuming, certainly not
for the novice user, although the steps are well detailed in the GHC
developer documentation.
If so, I'd encourage you to play with the Ghci Debugger
Alex Queiroz wrote:
Hallo,
On 11/13/06, Mark T.B. Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How up to date will Debian unstable's GHC be kept, though? It seems
pretty good at the moment, but there have been times when we've had to
install from source instead of via Debian earlier this year so
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Am Montag, den 13.11.2006, 21:24 +1100 schrieb John Ky:
I have modules that don't export some functions. Is there a way I can
access them from ghci without exporting them?
It seems that if there are .hi files around, ghci can't reach the
afaik, there are just two good enough libs - wxHaskell and GtkHs. can
anyone point (or write) detailed comparison of their features?
One point in wxHaskell's favour is that it supports Mac OS X directly. At
present, to the best of my knowledge, you can only run GtkHs applications
on OS X using
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 13:36:13 +0300, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Ketil,
Monday, November 13, 2006, 10:45:59 AM, you wrote:
My friend offered me 3 variants: SuSe, Fedora Core 5, free variant of
RedHat (i can't remember its name, may be Ubuntu?)
CentOS, perhaps? It is usually good advice
Iván Pérez Domínguez wrote:
Neil Mitchell wrote:
Hi Bulat,
afaik, there are just two good enough libs - wxHaskell and GtkHs. can
anyone point (or write) detailed comparison of their features? i plan
to write large GUI program in Haskell and want to select best one.
the
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
third: are there any appetizers demonstrating features of each
library and with source code available for studying? except for
memory.pdf which don't mention where full source can be downloaded
it will be interesting to see sources of more business-like
applications
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 16:48 +0300, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Duncan,
Monday, November 13, 2006, 4:10:03 PM, you wrote:
on the download page only GHC 6.4.1 support mentioned. is 6.4.2 and
6.6 supported on windows?
The last official release for Windows supports GHC 6.2.2 and 6.4.1. I
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 18:00 +, Tim Docker wrote:
afaik, there are just two good enough libs - wxHaskell and GtkHs. can
anyone point (or write) detailed comparison of their features?
One point in wxHaskell's favour is that it supports Mac OS X directly. At
present, to the best of my
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 17:10 +0300, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
The one thing you should be aware of is that Windows + Threading +
Gtk2Hs + Gtk + GHC = Pain.
why? are you tried to call Gtk2Hs from only one thread?
I think so, yes. Or there are bizare -threaded restrictions. Only
Duncan
I notice that the Socket returned by ghc Network.Socket (socket) has
been set non-blocking. (Noticed empirically, not from documentation.)
The Network.Socket functions that use it, e.g., recv, are ready for
that, of course, but as a general rule, external functions that
expect a socket are very
Hello Duncan,
Monday, November 13, 2006, 10:19:16 PM, you wrote:
why? are you tried to call Gtk2Hs from only one thread?
it will be great to see comments about this. it's impossible to write
my program without using threaded RTS
As for the threaded RTS, currently that's only ok if you
[reposted with improved subject]
I notice that the Socket returned by ghc Network.Socket (socket) has
been set non-blocking. (Noticed empirically, not from documentation.)
The Network.Socket functions that use it, e.g., recv, are ready for
that, of course, but as a general rule, external
Has anyone succeeded in getting it running on OSX/intel at all?
...I had a brief go a few weeks back, managed to get the Cairo Clock
running, but anything that used GTK seemed to blow up instantly. (OSX/
ppc was fine).
--Ben
On 13 Nov 2006, at 19:03, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Mon,
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 20:49 +, Ben Moseley wrote:
Has anyone succeeded in getting it running on OSX/intel at all?
I'm not sure actually. I seem to recall someone trying it but I can't
remember who now.
cc-ing to gtk2hs-users in case anyone knows: has anyone on OSX tried the
new Gtk+ 2.10.x
gtk-demo seemed to run fine.
--Ben
On 13 Nov 2006, at 21:01, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 20:49 +, Ben Moseley wrote:
Has anyone succeeded in getting it running on OSX/intel at all?
I'm not sure actually. I seem to recall someone trying it but I can't
remember who now.
as RedHat and RPMs is widely used for packaging software available via
internet. Is Ubuntu supports RPMs too?
I think it's widely regarded as a Bad Idea to mix packages between
distributions.
I would suggest Ubuntu (or Debian Sid if you are interested in getting
newer versions of GHC). I
37 matches
Mail list logo
