constraining it to = 1.17 would be better while 1.18 isn't out yet..
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Roman Cheplyaka r...@ro-che.info wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing something, but why not just
cabal-version: =1.18
?
It will constrain the Cabal version, not cabal-install, but judging
* TP paratribulati...@free.fr [2013-05-23 00:34:57+0200]
Hi,
In the program I am trying to write, I have a problem that can be reduced to
the following dummy example:
--
{-# LANGUAGE GADTs #-}
{-# LANGUAGE DataKinds #-}
{-# LANGUAGE KindSignatures #-}
{-#
Hi Heinrich,
Looks simple and interesting. I browsed the git, but not much docs yet.
Just examples, or have I looked at wrong places?
I see that API is still under heavy design. When do you expect the API might
stabilize?
(BTW, examples in Readme do not work.)
vlatko
Vlatko Basic wrote:
I liked Andreas's idea (cited below). Hence the new package
prelude-prime.
https://github.com/feuerbach/prelude-prime
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/prelude-prime
Pull requests are welcome, but let's stick to widely agreed changes
(like the Foldable/Traversable one). I think one of the
I wish it was possible to use an extension
CustomPrelude = Prelude.Prime
In the cabal file
2013/5/23 Roman Cheplyaka r...@ro-che.info
I liked Andreas's idea (cited below). Hence the new package
prelude-prime.
https://github.com/feuerbach/prelude-prime
HI,
Am Donnerstag, den 23.05.2013, 12:38 +0400 schrieb Anton Kholomiov:
I wish it was possible to use an extension
CustomPrelude = Prelude.Prime
In the cabal file
as far as I know, GHC simply issues an implicit
import Prelude
without package qualifiers. So you can get what you want by
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Anton Kholomiov anton.kholom...@gmail.com
wrote:
I wish it was possible to use an extension
CustomPrelude = Prelude.Prime
In the cabal file
I'm not necessarily opposed to this idea, but I'd like to point out that it
can have a negative impact on
On 23 May 2013 11:26, Joachim Breitner m...@joachim-breitner.de wrote:
So you can get what you want by not
depending on base, but rather have prelude-prime re-export all modules
from base plus its own Preldue.
How would you re-export all base's modules from the prelude-prime
package? I didn't
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 23.05.2013, 11:52 +0200 schrieb Bas van Dijk:
On 23 May 2013 11:26, Joachim Breitner m...@joachim-breitner.de wrote:
So you can get what you want by not
depending on base, but rather have prelude-prime re-export all modules
from base plus its own Preldue.
How
On 23 May 2013 11:54, Joachim Breitner m...@joachim-breitner.de wrote:
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 23.05.2013, 11:52 +0200 schrieb Bas van Dijk:
On 23 May 2013 11:26, Joachim Breitner m...@joachim-breitner.de wrote:
So you can get what you want by not
depending on base, but rather have
Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
The rule of thumb is that you should never use IncoherentInstances.
The proper way to do it is:
data Person :: Gender - * where
Person :: String - Person b
Child
:: (PrettyPrint a, PrettyPrint b)
= String - Person a - Person b -
* TP paratribulati...@free.fr [2013-05-23 13:23:36+0200]
Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
The rule of thumb is that you should never use IncoherentInstances.
The proper way to do it is:
data Person :: Gender - * where
Person :: String - Person b
Child
::
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Roman Cheplyaka r...@ro-che.info wrote:
Pull requests are welcome, but let's stick to widely agreed changes
(like the Foldable/Traversable one). I think one of the reasons why
other Preludes haven't been adopted is because they were too radical.
* Andreas Abel
* Manuel Gómez tar...@gmail.com [2013-05-23 08:33:15-0430]
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Roman Cheplyaka r...@ro-che.info wrote:
Pull requests are welcome, but let's stick to widely agreed changes
(like the Foldable/Traversable one). I think one of the reasons why
other Preludes haven't
Vlatko Basic wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
Looks simple and interesting. I browsed the git, but not much docs yet.
Just examples, or have I looked at wrong places?
Thanks! Only examples and Haddock documentation so far, though the
latter is extensive.
I see that API is still under heavy design. When
Great! Thanks. I adapted that trick and it worked fine:
https://github.com/rrnewton/haskell-lockfree-queue/blob/cb8ca1a5d8b4c02e45eeca54fbc66f0c58aeff56/AtomicPrimops/Setup.hs
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Carter Schonwald
carter.schonw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Ryan,
I ran into a
Hi,
As the subject says, I'd like to use the GHCI debugger to inspect the results
of some functions. I tried to set :break-points on these functions and
:step through them, but unless I use :force I never get to see the result
of these functions.
Is it possible to somehow break when the result
On 05/22/2013 11:36 PM, Simon Marechal wrote:
Anyone has an idea on how I should approach this problem ?
For future reference : I believe I have found the problem, and it was
quite obvious ...
When generating Ruby objects from Haskell, they are not referenced by
anything in the interpreter.
18 matches
Mail list logo
