Daniel Schuessler wrote:
The thing I don't understand yet is the last line: Why is it OK to discard the
leftover input from the (f x) Iteratee and yield just the leftover input from
the first one (m0)?
First of all, the question is about an older version of Iteratee. For
example, the
The last package that got haddock'ed is [1]. The first package that
isn't haddock'ed is [2].
HTH, =)
[1] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/acid-state-0.3
[2] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/text-json-qq-0.3.0
--
Felipe.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:45:27 -0700, Carter Schonwald car...@cs.dartmouth.edu
wrote:
Kevin,
what version of cabal install are you using?
cabal-install version 0.8.2
using version 1.8.0.6 of the Cabal library
I ask because prior to the 1.10.* version series, cabal would have a much
harder
This is a much cleaner definition of Iteratee and I'm happy to see it.
When are you going to move from your FTP site to Github, by the way? :)
Regards,
John A. De Goes
Twitter: @jdegoes
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/jdegoes
On Apr 21, 2011, at 12:32 AM, o...@okmij.org wrote:
Daniel
Hi Cafe,
Here is another example of why 'let' should be sometimes generalised.
I've been recently playing with indexed monads (for JSON processing) and
found out that the following code fails to typecheck:
{-# LANGUAGE MonoLocalBinds #-}
data M t t' a = M
ipure :: a - M t t a
ipure a = M
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:20 AM, KQ qu...@sparq.org wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:45:27 -0700, Carter Schonwald
car...@cs.dartmouth.edu wrote:
Kevin,
what version of cabal install are you using?
cabal-install version 0.8.2
using version 1.8.0.6 of the Cabal library
snip
Is it safe to
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 19:25, Rogan Creswick cresw...@gmail.com wrote:
It is safe to do this. You will probably need to specify the full
version, since despite being included in the latest haskell platform,
cabal-install-0.10.x is in the list of things that cabal won't install
automatically.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Erik Hesselink hessel...@gmail.com wrote:
It doesn't seem to do this anymore for parsec. The preferred-versions
now look like this:
base 4
cabal-install 0.10
network 2.2.3 || = 2.2.4
Or am I looking at the wrong thing?
Oh, interesting. I think you're
I'm sure this must be a VFAQ, but... There seems to be universal
agreement that Darcs is a nice idea, but is unsuitable for real
projects. Even GHC keeps talking about getting rid of Darcs. Can anybody
tell me what the problems with Darcs actually are?
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Andrew Coppin
andrewcop...@btinternet.comwrote:
I'm sure this must be a VFAQ, but... There seems to be universal agreement
that Darcs is a nice idea, but is unsuitable for real projects. Even GHC
keeps talking about getting rid of Darcs. Can anybody tell me
larry.liuxinyu liuxiny...@gmail.com writes:
Somebody told me that:
Eduard Sergeev • BTW, more recent QuickCheck (from Haskell Platform
2011.2.0.X - contains QuickCheck-2.4.0.1) seems to identifies the
problem correctly:
*** Failed! Falsifiable (after 3 tests and 2 shrinks):
[0,1]
False
I
My chief complaint is that it's built on patch theory, which is
ill-defined and doesn't seem particularly useful. The Bazaar/Git/Mercurial
DAG model is much easier to understand and work with.
Possibly as a consequence of its shaky foundation, Darcs is much slower than
the competition -- this
Greetings,
I am very pleased to officially announce HacPhi 2011, a Haskell
hackathon/get-together to be held July 29-31 at the University of
Pennsylvania in Philadelphia supported by contributions from Amgen,
Jane Street, and Microsoft Research. The hackathon will officially
kick off at
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:16 PM, John Millikin jmilli...@gmail.com wrote:
My chief complaint is that it's built on patch theory, which is
ill-defined and doesn't seem particularly useful. The Bazaar/Git/Mercurial
DAG model is much easier to understand and work with.
For me its greatest asset
Andrew Coppin wrote:
I'm sure this must be a VFAQ, but... There seems to be universal
agreement that Darcs is a nice idea, but is unsuitable for real
projects.
I not sure what constitues a real project, but I have found
Darcs to be more than satisfactory for Ben Lippmeier's DDC
compiler
John Millikin wrote:
My chief complaint is that it's built on patch theory, which is
ill-defined and doesn't seem particularly useful. The Bazaar/Git/Mercurial
DAG model is much easier to understand and work with.
Possibly as a consequence of its shaky foundation, Darcs is much slower
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Andrew Coppin
andrewcop...@btinternet.com wrote:
I'm sure this must be a VFAQ, but... There seems to be universal agreement
that Darcs is a nice idea, but is unsuitable for real projects. Even GHC
keeps talking about getting rid of Darcs. Can anybody tell me
Um, the patch theory is what makes darcs just work. There is no need
to understand it any more than you have to know VLSI design to
understand how your computer works. The end result is that darcs
repositories don't get corrupted and the order you integrate patches
doesn't affect things meaning
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 16:16 -0700, John Meacham wrote:
Um, the patch theory is what makes darcs just work. There is no need
to understand it any more than you have to know VLSI design to
understand how your computer works. The end result is that darcs
repositories don't get corrupted and the
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 21:29 +0100, Andrew Coppin wrote:
I'm sure this must be a VFAQ, but... There seems to be universal
agreement that Darcs is a nice idea, but is unsuitable for real
projects. Even GHC keeps talking about getting rid of Darcs. Can anybody
tell me what the problems with
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 23:56 +0200, Nick Smallbone wrote:
larry.liuxinyu liuxiny...@gmail.com writes:
Somebody told me that:
Eduard Sergeev • BTW, more recent QuickCheck (from Haskell Platform
2011.2.0.X - contains QuickCheck-2.4.0.1) seems to identifies the
problem correctly:
***
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Maciej Marcin Piechotka
uzytkown...@gmail.com wrote:
Assume following changes
1. Feature X - file x.hs
2. Feature Y - file y.hs and x.hs
3. Feature Z - file z.hs and x.hs
4. Fix to feature Y (changes x.hs)
5. Fix to feature X (changes x.hs)
Now before
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:36 AM, John A. De Goes j...@n-brain.net wrote:
This is a much cleaner definition of Iteratee and I'm happy to see it.
I'm confused by this comment. Isn't John Lato's implementation of Iteratee
(on hackage) is based on the example implementation that Oleg pointed you
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 19:19 -0500, Jake McArthur wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Maciej Marcin Piechotka
uzytkown...@gmail.com wrote:
Assume following changes
1. Feature X - file x.hs
2. Feature Y - file y.hs and x.hs
3. Feature Z - file z.hs and x.hs
4. Fix to feature Y
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Maciej Marcin Piechotka
uzytkown...@gmail.com wrote:
Last time I checked it disallowed my as 5 depended on 4 which depended
on 3 which depended on 2 which depended on 1 as all changed x.hs
Merely changing the same file is not sufficient for that. In order for
I'm running Haskell Platform 2011.2.0.1 on a MacOS 10.6.7 machine (the
machine is 64-bit, but I'm running the 32-bit platform).
I'm writing an application for personal use, and I'd like to use Cabal to
package it up and handle installation. This way, when I'm working on the
program, I won't
+1 to what you said.
On 4/21/11 4:16 PM, John Meacham wrote:
Incidentally, I wrote a github like site based around darcs a few
years ago at codehole.org. It is just used internally by me for
certain projects. but if people were interested, I could resume work
on it and make it public.
John,
Codehole doesn't sound like a good name. Don't lose stuff in codehole!
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 21, 2011, at 7:33 PM, Simon Michael si...@joyful.com wrote:
+1 to what you said.
On 4/21/11 4:16 PM, John Meacham wrote:
Incidentally, I wrote a github like site based around darcs a few
John Lato's iteratee package is based on IterateeMCPS.hs[1]. I used
IterateeM.hs for enumerator, because when I benchmarked them the non-CPS
version was something like 10% faster on most operations.
The new IterateeM.hs solves some problems with the old encoding, but I
haven't switched
On Thursday, April 21, 2011 4:16:07 PM UTC-7, John Meacham wrote:
Um, the patch theory is what makes darcs just work. There is no need
to understand it any more than you have to know VLSI design to
understand how your computer works. The end result is that darcs
repositories don't get
On 22 April 2011 09:36, Maciej Marcin Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 23:56 +0200, Nick Smallbone wrote:
larry.liuxinyu liuxiny...@gmail.com writes:
Somebody told me that:
*** Failed! Falsifiable (after 3 tests and 2 shrinks):
[0,1]
False
I don't think
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:42 PM, John Millikin jmilli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 21, 2011 4:16:07 PM UTC-7, John Meacham wrote:
Um, the patch theory is what makes darcs just work. There is no need
to understand it any more than you have to know VLSI design to
understand how your
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Richard Cobbe co...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
I'm running Haskell Platform 2011.2.0.1 on a MacOS 10.6.7 machine (the
machine is 64-bit, but I'm running the 32-bit platform).
I'm writing an application for personal use, and I'd like to use Cabal to
package it up and
On 4/21/11 10:33 PM, Simon Michael wrote:
+1 to what you said.
On 4/21/11 4:16 PM, John Meacham wrote:
Incidentally, I wrote a github like site based around darcs a few
years ago at codehole.org. It is just used internally by me for
certain projects. but if people were interested, I could
34 matches
Mail list logo
