of modeling more fundamental theories
as well.) The key point is that this is not absolute reality, it's
just a model.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http
x y = toEnum $ fromEnum x + fromEnum y
are not possible with Data.Text.Text . (Whether you really need these
is another question, of course.)
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe
the list in a
suitable Writer monad
layoutSet myButton $ do
text = Ok
on action = doSomething
with
(=) :: Property a - a - Writer Properties ()
It's ugly semantically but pleasant syntactically.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
where
more 0 _ = []
more n (x:xs) = f x ++ more (n + length (f x) - 1) xs
Unfortunately, this cannot be made to work with nub because that would
screw up the size calculation.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
)
where q = (row,col)
test seed = evalRand solve $ mkStdGen seed
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
by repeatedly applying synthesize to the
final state of bfs :
unBfs ts = (`index` 0) . queue $
until (List.null . nodes) synthesize ([],ts,empty)
By construction, we have obtained the desired
unBfs . bfs xs = id
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
PS:
* I have used a double-ended queue
about this parallel approach?
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
trees again.
However, this solution is essentially the same as using a mutable tree,
the unique identifiers represent memory addresses. That's why I sought
to reconstruct the tree from the structure of the traversal (using the
same intermediate queue data structure, etc.).
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
sluggish to navigate between pages, doesn't support drag
drop from other applications and most importantly, doesn't play nice
with local files.
From the programmers point of view, I don't want to code my GUI in
Javascript either, I want to do it in Haskell.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http
supposed to.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
-Linux systems and you
still have to deal with unexpected errors somewhere deep in the dungeons
of preprocessing for the Haskell FFI.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http
the compiled binary with some otool vodoo; Inkscape did it
this way last time I remember. There was also a gtk framework once, but
it seems to be out of date.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
. Are they that
ashamed of their own software that they wouldn't want to be associated
with it, or is there some legal reason that they don't want to be
associated with it?
I'm sure they have their reasons, and who am I to judge them. Most
likely, it's about googleability.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http
. But maybe that's because no one
likes to be obsoleted...
In fact, I do have to admit that I'm secretly working on a specification
of a program that halts exactly when spec2code produces a program that
does not halt. It's my only hope!
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
Max Bolingbroke wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus wrote:
As I understand it, GHC implements the technique from Sparud's paper, so
this is a solved problem.
This is not my understanding. As far as I know, the STG machine has a
special notion of selector thunks, which represent projections from
Edward Z. Yang wrote:
This is a pretty terrible reason, but I'm going to throw it out there:
I like real names because they're much more aesthetically pleasing.
I agree, and this is why I phased out apfelmus in favor of the
pseudonym Heinrich Apfelmus.
So, a more accurate policy would
, for instance
for creating functional lenses for record types
data Foo = Foo { bar_ :: Int, ...}
$(DeriveLenses Foo)
-- bar :: Lens Foo Int
It seems to me that metaocaml is more used as user annotated partial
evaluation?
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
a bit dormant.
And Javascript [1] is really not _that_ bad!
But it's not Haskell. :'(
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
, but that's what I can think of right now off the
top of my hat. :)
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
f m n p = return f `ap` m `ap` n `ap` o
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus wrote:
I'm curious, can metaocaml create new data type definitions, value
declarations or type class instances?
No metaocaml cannot do this. It is restricted to the expression
level, and not the declaration level. Moreover you cannot pattern
match
cell and
garbage collect the old one while you're at it.
But if you can skip large contiguous parts of the lists, then sharing
may be worth thinking about.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell
gain anything.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
/package/operational
which implements the same concept. It's throughly explained here:
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com/articles/operational-monad.html
http://projects.haskell.org/operational/
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
Steve Schafer wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus wrote:
I agree, and this is why I phased out apfelmus in favor of the
pseudonym Heinrich Apfelmus.
You mean your name isn't really Applesauce?
I would probably apply for a name change if it were. ;)
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http
is prompted?
Would you like to send an anonymous report of this build failure to
hackage.org? Users have been uploading 189 reports so far; yours would
be the 190th report that ensures high quality Haskell packages! [y/n]
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus writes:
Perhaps exactly when the user is prompted?
Would you like to send an anonymous report of this build failure to
hackage.org? Users have been uploading 189 reports so far; yours would
be the 190th report that ensures high quality Haskell
this actually be a member of the MonadTrans class?
mapMonad :: (Monad m1, Monad m2, MonadTrans t) =
(forall a . m1 a - m2 a) - t m1 a - t m2 a
?
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe
to several examples. Two small examples are also
included in the Haddock documentation.
I'd like to make it very accessible, so please don't hesitate to report
any difficulties with finding and understanding documentation and examples!
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
(runIdentity x)
violates this condition.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
it verbatim, but try to simplify it a bit to turn it into
another easy to understand example of how to use operational .
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http
| (x:xs) - tails example, y - xs]
which cuts the total running time in half. It's still quadratic in the
length of example . I'm sure there are faster algorithms out there that
can bring it down to O(n log n) if you want.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
Heinrich Apfelmus wrote:
Limestraël wrote:
Okay, I start to understand better...
Just, Heinrich, how would implement the mapMonad function in terms of the
operational package?
You just shown the signature.
Ah, that has to be implemented by the library, the user cannot implement
Daniel Fischer wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus:
For instance, your expression can be replaced by
filter (/=0) [hammingX x y | (x:xs) - tails example, y - xs]
which cuts the total running time in half. It's still quadratic in the
length of example . I'm sure there are faster algorithms out
, chapter 12.
Richard Bird. Introduction to Functional Programming using Haskell
2nd edition, chapter 7.
The wikibook contains some preliminary material, too.
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Haskell/Graph_reduction
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
- forkIO (down m return ())
down (return ())
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Leon Smith wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus wrote:
which were introduced by John Hughes in his Phd thesis from 1983. They
are intriguing! Unfortunately, I haven't been able to procure a copy of
Hughes' thesis, either electronic or in paper. :( Can anyone help? Are
there any other resources about
. But that should not deter from experimentation. :)
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
qualities. In fact, I am
convinced that it's not a good idea to focus on the semantics of FRP,
the key focus should be on the syntax, on the way of expressing a given
thought in computer words.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
of the operational
package, it's the WebSessionState.lhs on
http://projects.haskell.org/operational/examples.html
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman
' (Return a) = return a
id' (i := k) = singleton i = mapMonad f . k
(This is contrary to what I said earlier, mapMonad does *not* have to
be a library function.)
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing
slightly into the future. The FPS number
measures the frequency of drawn graphics, not the rate of physics
updates. There may be multiple physics steps per drawing when the latter
is slow, or the other way round, when the latter is fast.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
of requiring a fixed number to be specified in advance?
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus writes:
I'm not sure what the right solution is, but I think it definitely
involves catering for different node types. For instance, the library
could operate on a type
newtype Graph node a b = Graph (Gr a b, Data.Map.Map Int node
into the graph type,
though, an abstract Node type might work as well.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus writes:
Graphs with different node types don't behave differently; graphs are
parametric with respect to the node type, just like lists don't behave
differently on different element types.
There will be a Map-based graph available
Ivan Miljenovic wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus wrote:
Yes, the integers are just indexes. Of course, the example with the even
integers is a bit silly; but if the integers are actually indexes, then
it's conceptually cleaner to make them abstract, i.e.
data Node -- constructors
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus writes:
I'd be happy with either one. :) In both cases, I want to specify a
custom vertex type.
Except an abstract type isn't a custom vertex type...
I can either do that directly if the library permits, though I think the
solution
some mailing lists posts on his debit method here:
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com/articles/debit-method.html
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus writes:
I was under the impression that I would have to define a new graph data
type with FilePath as vertex type and make that an instance of Graph
? [..]
Well, we'll provide a Map-based one that lets you specify the vertex
type as a type
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus writes:
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
Well, we'll provide a Map-based one that lets you specify the vertex
type as a type parameter; this functionality (type parameter being ued
for the vertex type) won't be required since not all graphs
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus writes:
Yes; what I mean is that you can retrofit a custom vertex type to any
graph implementation that uses a fixed vertex type. So, let's say that
data Gr a b = .. -- graph with vertex type Vertex Gr = Int
then
type Gr' node a b
theorem provers, this should no longer
be the case.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Michael Schuerig wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus wrote:
I have absolutely no experience with real time system, but if I were
tasked to write with these coding standards, I would refuse and
instead create a small DSL in Haskell that compiles to the requested
subset of C.
That suggestion
on m .
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
a
forall r .
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Sebastian Fischer wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus wrote:
The reason is that you have chosen the wrong type for your
continuation monad; it should be
newtype CMaybe a = CMaybe (forall r. (a - Maybe r) - Maybe r)
Yes, with this type `orElse` has the same type as `mplus`, which is very
nice
Heinrich Apfelmus wrote:
Sebastian Fischer wrote:
For example, the implementation of
`callCC` does not type check with your changed data type.
[snip]
As for the interaction: what should
((callCC ($ 0) mzero) `orElse` return 2) = return . (+3)
be? If the scope of callCC should
Sebastian Fischer wrote:
Edward Kmett wrote:
Sebastian Fischer wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus wrote:
newtype CMaybe a = CMaybe (forall r. (a - Maybe r) - Maybe r)
Yes, with this type `orElse` has the same type as `mplus`, which is
very nice.
This type is the same as Codensity Maybe using
David Menendez wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus wrote:
Sebastian Fischer wrote:
I wonder whether for every monad `m` and `a :: Codensity m a`
getCodensity a f = getCodensity a return = f
Is this true? Why (not)?
It's not true.
a = Codensity $ \x - Just 42
f = return . (+1
(eval . view . k) xs
The call pattern of this interpreter shows that you can implement your
type as
newtype CMaybe a = CMaybe { forall b . (a - [b]) - [b] }
but, as I said, this type is not good way of thinking about it in my
opinion.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http
is a reimplementation of Koen Claessen's
poor man's concurrency monad based on this approach:
PoorMansConcurrency.hs
http://projects.haskell.org/operational/examples.html
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Sebastian Fischer wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus wrote:
[...] you can implement your type as
newtype CMaybe a = CMaybe { forall b . (a - [b]) - [b] }
Yes. For me it was interesting to see how far we get by wrapping `Maybe`
in `Codensity`: we get more than `Maybe` but not as much
,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
:
ContextDTree a = List (DList (a * DTree a) * a)
After all, what you describe is only the context of DTree a within a
single level, but it might be many levels down in the tree.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe
the derivative of List
first:
List' x = List x * List x
and then you can use the chain rule to find DTreeF .
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman
can also use a toy implementation like
type Graph = [(Node, -- Department
[Node]) -- List of Departments it shares revenue to
]
To test whether a graph has cycles (looping mapping), you can use a
depth-first search.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http
might get
reconstructed redundantly. (However, there are other strategies for
memoization that are persistent across calls.)
It should be
f = \n - memo ! n
where
memo = ..
so that memo is shared across multiple calls like f 1 , f 2 etc.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http
Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus wrote:
Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
You're correct in pointing out that f uses memoization inside of
itself to cache the intermediate values that it commutes, but those
values don't get shared between invocations of f; thus, if you call
f
such problems.
As Michael already mentioned, the problem is undecidable in general
since it includes group rings.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman
, say
product [1..5] - 1 * product [2..5] - .. - 120
is a proof that the initial and the final expression denote the same value.
The Curry-Howards correspondence is about the type system, viewing types
as logical propositions and programs as their proofs.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
Backhouse, P Jansson, J Jeuring, L Meertens
Generic Programming - An Introduction -
http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~patrikj/poly/afp98/
A corresponding chapter in the wikibook (Datatype algebra) has not
been written, so far.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
Günther Schmidt wrote:
there are numerous examples on how to implement a DSL, but I haven't
been able to figure out how to design one.
I mean I have a pretty good idea of the problem domain, I've coded it
over and over again until I got it right. Now I'd like to express that
part as a DSL
David Menendez wrote:
Floptical Logic wrote:
The code below is a little interactive program that uses some state.
It uses StateT with IO to keep state. My question is: what is the
best way to generalize this program to work with any IO-like
monad/medium? For example, I would like the
Daryoush Mehrtash wrote:
I am trying to learn more about concurrent applications in Haskell by
studying an existing a real application source code. I would very much
appreciate if you can recommend an application that you feel has done a good
job in implementing a real time application in
zaxis wrote:
It works very well. However, as i am used to C style so i want convert it
into
winSSQ count noRed noBlue = do {
let yesRed = [1..33] \\ noRed;
let yesBlue = [1..16] \\ noBlue;
bracket (openFile ssqNum.txt WriteMode) (hClose) (\hd1 - pickSSQ
count yesRed yesBlue
zaxis wrote:
oh! thanks! But why ?
The gory details can be found in the Haskell 98 Report:
syntax of do expressions
http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/exps.html#do-expressions
syntax of decls
http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/decls.html
Details for the layout rule
Bas van Dijk wrote:
1) What's the difference between your:
tail ~(Cons _ xs) = xs
and the more simple:
tailStrict (Cons _ xs) = xs ?
I know they're desugared to:
tail ys = let Cons _ xs = ys in xs
and:
tailStrict ys = case ys of Cons _ xs - xs respectively.
But aren't they
Paul Johnson wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
takeLargest k = take k . sort
Because sort is lazily evaluated this only does enough sorting to
find the first k elements. I guess the complexity is something like
O(n*k*log(k)).
Correction: O(n*log(k))
It's O(n + k log k) (which is the same
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Would someone like to make a Haskell wiki page explaining all this?
Very helpful for people using wx for the first time. Maybe there is
one already?
The enableGUI thing is mentioned here:
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/WxHaskell/MacOS_X
Not that easy to
Dan Weston wrote:
Can you elaborate on why Const is not a monad?
return x = Const x
fmap f (Const x) = Const (f x)
join (Const (Const x)) = Const x
This is not Const , this is the Identity monad.
The real Const looks like this:
newtype Const b a = Const b
instance Monoid b =
Eugene Kirpichov wrote:
I took a toy problem - find the first node satisfying a predicate in a
binary tree, started with a naive Maybe-based implementation - and
experimented with 3 ways of changing the program:
- Church-encode the Maybe
- Convert the program into CPS
- Defunctionalize
David Menendez wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Heinrich Apfelmus
apfel...@quantentunnel.de wrote:
Even then, the results are mixed. The Church-encoding shines in GHCi as
it should, but loses its advantage when the code is being compiled. I
guess we have to look at the core if we want
David Menendez wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus wrote:
David Menendez wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus wrote:
Even then, the results are mixed. The Church-encoding shines in GHCi as
it should, but loses its advantage when the code is being compiled. I
guess we have to look at the core if we want to know
Luke Palmer wrote:
I believe you can get what you want using the diagonal function from
Control.Monad.Omega.
product xs ys = [ [ (x,y) | y - ys ] | x - xs ]
diag2 xs ys = diagonal (product xs ys)
I think if you separate taking the cartesian product and flattening
it, like this, you might
Conor McBride wrote:
and you can calculate how much testing is enough by
computing an upper bound on the polynomial degree of the
expression. (The summation operator increments degree,
the difference operator decreases it, like in calculus.)
This is sometimes described
as the reflective
David Menendez wrote:
I think replacing put s with put $! s should guarantee that the
state is evaluated.
If you're using get and put in many place in the code, you could try
something along these lines:
newtype SStateT s m a = S { unS :: StateT s m a } deriving (Monad, etc.)
instance
jean-christophe mincke wrote:
I do not master all the subtilities of lazy evaluation yet and perhaps tail
recursivity does not have the same importance (or does not offer the same
guarantees) in a lazy language as it does in a strict language.
Yep, that's the case. With lazy evaluation, tail
Simon Marlow wrote:
I've just uploaded deepseq-1.0.0.0 to Hackage
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/deepseq
This provides a DeepSeq class with a deepseq method, equivalent to the
existing NFData/rnf in the parallel package. I'll be using this in a
newly revamped parallel package,
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
| Are there workarounds for uses of impredicative types, or do we lose the
| ability to express certain programs as a result?
There's usually a workaround. I include the msg I sent below.
I tried to use impredicative polymorphism once to create polymorphic
values
:: (a - c - c) - (b - c) - Train a b - c
fold f g (Loco b) = g b
fold f g (Wagon a t) = f a (fold f g t)
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org
.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
problems.
Also, knowing Haskell's evaluation model helps a lot
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Haskell/Graph_reduction
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org
languages too, like logic languages or constraint languages (does the
latter exist?)
Related:
Paul Hudak, Mark P. Jones.
Haskell vs. Ada vs. C++ vs. Awk vs. ...
An Experiment in Software Prototyping Productivity
http://www.haskell.org/papers/NSWC/jfp.ps
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
to the dog
itself.
Another, not entirely serious, suggestion: ;)
data Life a b = Work a (Life a b)
| TheEnd b
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http
rather click on an application icon in the Dock.
You can write an applescript similar to
Open Terminal Here
from http://www.entropy.ch/software/applescript/
and endow it with a custom icon.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
/Caboose makes sense too and swapping the arguments
is less natural to read.
It's a bifunctor! :D
I don't really mind. The application list that may end with an error
uses a fixed b , so putting the a at the end makes sense.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
) memory instead of an infinite amount and
foldl (+) 0 [1..n]
taking O(n) memory as opposed to
foldl' (+) 0 [1..n]
which only takes O(1) memory.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell
Jason Dagit wrote:
withPending :: (a - Patch - a) - IO a
And withPending would start the streaming and make sure that the stream
cannot be visible as a data dependency outside of withPending.
[...]
Heinrich Apfelmus wrote:
In other words, exporting only a foldl' -like interface does
1 - 100 of 397 matches
Mail list logo
