Justin Bailey wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 9:11 PM, Jon Harrop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mathematica uses a single arbitrary-precision integer to represent each
generation of a 1D automaton. The rules to derive the next generation are
compiled into arithmetic operations on the integer. The offloads
Maurício wrote:
Hi,
I'm learning about categories using Saunders
Mac Lane book. I'm also learning French. Do
you guys know of a nice French mailing list,
or forum, where people discuss about
categories (and where beginners are
accepted)?
newsgroup: fr.sci.math
a+, ld.
Mirko Rahn wrote:
The following code is the direct translation of your Haskell code
void f(int x, intset s) {
printf(%d, , x);
f (intset_elem(s, x/2) ? 3*x : x/2, intset_put(s, x));
}
No, not that easy. The Haskell code works with arbitrary precision
Integer, the C code with a fixed
apfelmus wrote:
Henning Thielemann wrote:
apfelmus wrote:
Back then, I was given the task to calculate some sequence
of numbers which I did in one page of C code. So far so good, but when I
asked the task assigner about his solution, he responded: Ah, this
problem, that's 1 line in Haskell.
Conal Elliott wrote:
On Nov 21, 2007 3:49 AM, Laurent Deniau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
Conal Elliott wrote:
Moreover, functional programming makes it easy to have much more
state
than imperative programming, namely state over
Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
Laurent Deniau wrote:
Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
And you still need to think about where you have to introduce delays
to avoid infinite loops?
I don't see why, unless you want to have a memory or explicitly stop
the time which means it's a parameter of the transition
Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
Conal Elliott wrote:
Moreover, functional programming makes it easy to have much more state
than imperative programming, namely state over *continuous* time. The
temporally discrete time imposed by the imperative model is pretty
puny in comparison. Continuous (or
Andrew Coppin wrote:
2. How do you implement a program that is fundamentally about state
mutation in a programming language which abhors state mutation?
Haskell taught me one thing (at least). The World is not mutating but it
is moving. Physics shows that no movement (no time) means no World
Jon Harrop wrote:
On Tuesday 13 November 2007 16:03, Laurent Deniau wrote:
OCaml was used to write a meta-program which applies heuristics to
minimize the runtime of the critical C code (i.e. the butterflies). This
has nothing to do with FFT computation
No. The sole purpose of the OCaml
Henning Thielemann wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Jon Harrop wrote:
On Tuesday 13 November 2007 08:41, Henning Thielemann wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Jon Harrop wrote:
Penetration is highest in parts of industry where small groups of
talented programmers get together, most notably startups.
Jules Bean wrote:
Laurent Deniau wrote:
Henning Thielemann wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Jon Harrop wrote:
the FFT routines in MATLAB (FFTW: written in OCaml) and the SML
software
that The MathWorks sell.
I see, but FFTW was not developed by MathWorks, but by Matteo Frigo and
Steven G
Henning Thielemann wrote:
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Albert Y. C. Lai wrote:
Granted, perhaps your perspective is, if every other company is
shouting customers are number one, then ours must too, and who
actually lives up to it is the non-sequitur here. You're in the
buzzword war, not the evidence
Henning Thielemann wrote:
Productivity, robustness, maintainability: purity, type system,
etc. Parallelism!
'type system' is something where C derivatives and scripting languages
are weak - but their users count this as advantage.
Rarely (maybe in the 70's but not since C89). They count
Henning Thielemann wrote:
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Laurent Deniau wrote:
Henning Thielemann wrote:
Productivity, robustness, maintainability: purity, type
system, etc. Parallelism!
'type system' is something where C derivatives and scripting
languages are weak - but their users count
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On Oct 5, 2007, at 12:33 , Henning Thielemann wrote:
http://www.henning-thielemann.de/CHater.html#CvsM3_ControlFlow
I can has English? :)
If the first large table is any indication, though, we may need to
define inconsistent. C syntax shown there is quite
Jon Harrop wrote:
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 06:58:36 Ketil Malde wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 14:05 -0500, Doug Kirk wrote:
I *want* people (and companies) to move to Haskell
As a complete noob considering making a commercial venture into
Haskell, may I ask what people's opinions are on this?
16 matches
Mail list logo
