Henning Thielemann wrote:
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Albert Y. C. Lai wrote:
Granted, perhaps your perspective is, if every other company is
shouting "customers are number one", then ours must too, and who
actually lives up to it is the non-sequitur here. You're in the
buzzword war, not the evidence war. OK, then make sure you include
executability, as the Python guys in their infinite wisdom have
forgotten that one. You'll trump them on that point, ha!
me too
To exemplify, I now analyze the Python statement under my glass:
"dynamic object-oriented": Good, informative, I know those words
and I am the one to decide its implications to me.
To be honest - I do not know exactly what is meant with 'dynamic'
here. I know Python is dynamically typed - is this meant? Or
'dynamic' in the sense of 'can alter data at run-time', or 'can run
programs' at all?
all of that, plus the ability to change the objects' types (hierarchies)
at runtime like in most dynamically typed languages.
a+, ld.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
