Jason Dagit:
The reason I started telling everyone to avoid GHC in apt was the way
it was packaged. [..]
If they are lucky they figure out which apt package to install.
I think people who are too lazy to bother to find out how their
distribution works, should avoid any distribution.
%
Ketil Malde ke...@malde.org writes:
I think people who are too lazy to bother to find out how their
distribution works, should avoid any distribution.
% apt-cache search foo
% sudo apt-get install libghc6-foo\*
Agreed (to the extent that someone who can't be bothered figuring out an
Hi Ivan.
Excerpts from Ivan Miljenovic's message of Ter Mar 30 00:01:19 -0300 2010:
On 30 March 2010 13:55, Jason Dagit da...@codersbase.com wrote:
(...)
[..] now trying to profile something, oh wait, some problem again.
Agreed, if Debian didn't include the profiling libraries with GHC
Hi Jason and other,
thanks for the suggestions, the Debian Haskell Team is eager to learn
why people do or don’t use the packaged libraries.
Am Dienstag, den 30.03.2010, 14:01 +1100 schrieb Ivan Miljenovic:
On 30 March 2010 13:55, Jason Dagit da...@codersbase.com wrote:
[..] now trying to
Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org writes:
The profiling data is put in -prof packages, i.e. ghc-prof,
libghc6-network-prof etc. Indeed, there is no easy way to tell the
package system: Whenever I install a Haskell -dev package, please
install the -prof package as well.
One option might to
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.orgwrote:
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 28.03.2010, 09:04 +0100 schrieb Magnus Therning:
I have to say it looks like Debian has gotten their act together
somewhat when it comes to Haskel development. Many of the reasons for
my
On 30 March 2010 13:55, Jason Dagit da...@codersbase.com wrote:
The reason I started telling everyone to avoid GHC in apt was the way it was
packaged. Casual Haskell users would install GHC but get something like
1/10th of the libraries GHC installs when you do a source install
Is that
Ivan Miljenovic wrote:
[..] now trying to profile something, oh wait, some problem again.
Agreed, if Debian didn't include the profiling libraries with GHC
(though is this due to how Debian does packages?).
The haskell packages for Debian (I am one) have decided to stick to
a pattern where
On 30 March 2010 14:33, Erik de Castro Lopo mle...@mega-nerd.com wrote:
The haskell packages for Debian (I am one)
You are a Haskell _package_? :p
- The source code package will be called haskell-foo.
Is this an actual installable package (so you're installing the actual
source code?) ?
Ivan Miljenovic wrote:
On 30 March 2010 14:33, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
The haskell packages for Debian (I am one)
You are a Haskell _package_? :p
s/packages/packagers/
Although I speak for me, not the group.
- The source code package will be called haskell-foo.
Is this an actual
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 23:13:04 -0500
Jeff == Jeff Wheeler j...@nokrev.com wrote:
Jeff A bunch of stuff is packaged by dons for Arch; you can see a lot
Jeff of links to the Arch packages on Hackage. It might be worth
Jeff looking into.
+1 for Arch.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour | Hlapicina,
My choice is latest packages available throug package manager and I use
Fedora 12 as of now. Fedora 13 is coming out with ghc 6.12
By the way did you find out any packaged rpms for ghc on Centos? I remember
a thread from haskell beginners on this where somebody was trying to get
ghc installed on
On 28/03/10 08:50, Gour wrote:
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 23:13:04 -0500
Jeff == Jeff Wheeler j...@nokrev.com wrote:
Jeff A bunch of stuff is packaged by dons for Arch; you can see a lot
Jeff of links to the Arch packages on Hackage. It might be worth
Jeff looking into.
+1 for Arch.
Add one
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 28.03.2010, 09:04 +0100 schrieb Magnus Therning:
I have to say it looks like Debian has gotten their act together
somewhat when it comes to Haskel development. Many of the reasons for
my deserting Debian seem have been taken care of.
so, what is missing for you to come
Chris Dornan ch...@chrisdornan.com wrote:
I am choosing a Linux distribution for a production Haskell project
and would would normally just go with Debian (pedigree, stability, and
of course Haskell Platfom included) but CentOS is in the frame.
Are there any particularly strong reasons for
On 28/03/10 12:53, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 28.03.2010, 09:04 +0100 schrieb Magnus Therning:
I have to say it looks like Debian has gotten their act together
somewhat when it comes to Haskel development. Many of the reasons for
my deserting Debian seem have been taken
Magnus Therning wrote:
Well, maybe I should qualify that a bit. There were a few issues with Haskell
in Debian in the past. Most noticeably the lack of packages in the standard
repos. This seems to have been addressed. The other thing, that bit me at
the time, and witch really pushed me
2010/03/28 Ertugrul Soeylemez e...@ertes.de
However, as always there is a catch. Gentoo is a source distribution,
which means that you compile the entire system from scratch. On modern
computers this is quite fast, but sometimes it can hammer on your
patience.
To be fair, Gentoo has a
18 matches
Mail list logo
