Hi,
Just thought I'd send out a quick mail to see if there are any other
Haskellers based in London who might be interested in getting
together occasionally.
Anyway, if you're interested please reply to this.
Cheers,
--Ben
___
Haskell-Cafe
Has anyone succeeded in getting it running on OSX/intel at all?
...I had a brief go a few weeks back, managed to get the Cairo Clock
running, but anything that used GTK seemed to blow up instantly. (OSX/
ppc was fine).
--Ben
On 13 Nov 2006, at 19:03, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Mon,
gtk-demo seemed to run fine.
--Ben
On 13 Nov 2006, at 21:01, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 20:49 +, Ben Moseley wrote:
Has anyone succeeded in getting it running on OSX/intel at all?
I'm not sure actually. I seem to recall someone trying it but I can't
remember who now
Investment banking isn't likely to lead to improvements in zygohistomorphic
prepromorphisms.
Given that an investment bank could (purely hypothetically of course ;-)
use - say - paramorphisms as their fundamental approach to processing a
deeply-embedded DSEL, I wouldn't be too quick to
it's clear that FP ideas are becoming mainstream
_without_ any need of help from the financial community
This is far from clear - unless you want to deny that the financial community
has had any impact on FP...
due to Objective C with its Smalltalk influence
...and it's interesting to
Or for a bit of variety:
selectPlus s = [cs | ('+':cs) - lines s]
--Ben
On 4 Sep 2009, at 20:40, Martijn van Steenbergen wrote:
Hi Serge,
Serge LE HUITOUZE wrote:
I'm asking some advice on a small piece of code representing a
simplified version of a treatment I need to perform.
I have a
You mentioned a dream
Have you looked at Yi? might be worth a peek if you're prepared
to work towards your dream.
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Yi
...a long way to go - but it certainly nails #7!
--Ben
On 21 May 2007, at 15:44, Leif Frenzel wrote:
Bayley, Alistair wrote:
You can view a polymorphic unary type constructor of type :: a - T
as a polymorphic function.
In general, polymorphic functions correspond roughly to natural
transformations (in this case from the identity functor to T).
--Ben
On 31 Jan 2009, at 17:00, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
Hi,
I think
On 31 Jan 2009, at 20:54, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Ben Moseley ben_mose...@mac.com
wrote:
You can view a polymorphic unary type constructor of type :: a -
T as a
polymorphic function.
Shouldn't that be * :: a - T a ?
Yes, you're right. And when I say
On 7 Mar 2011, at 23:38, Alexander Solla wrote:
_|_ /= (_|_,_|_)
(undefined, undefined)
(*** Exception: Prelude.undefined
That is as close to Haskell-equality as you can get for a proto-value that
does not have an Eq instance. As a consequence of referential transparency,
10 matches
Mail list logo
