On 2008 Dec 19, at 4:13, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
When accurate names for Haskell concepts already exist we should use
them (as we have tried in the past). There has been too much
invention of misleading terminology in computing already. If some
people can't handle things having the right
When accurate names for Haskell concepts already exist we should use
them (as we have tried in the past). There has been too much
invention of misleading terminology in computing already. If some
people can't handle things having the right names, well, maybe they
should try another language.
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 09:13 +, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
When accurate names for Haskell concepts already exist we should use
them (as we have tried in the past). There has been too much
invention of misleading terminology in computing already.
There are two possible cases (this applies
