Re: [haskell-platform] #6: Windows installer

2009-04-17 Thread haskell-platform
#6: Windows installer ---+ Reporter: duncan |Owner: refold Type: task| Status: assigned Priority: major |Milestone: Release 1: 2009.0.0 Version: | Resolutio

Re: [haskell-platform] #12: OpenAL doesn't work on Windows (without some tinkering)

2009-04-17 Thread haskell-platform
#12: OpenAL doesn't work on Windows (without some tinkering) ---+ Reporter: refold |Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major |Milestone: Version: | Resolution: K

[haskell-platform] #12: OpenAL doesn't work on Windows (without some tinkering)

2009-04-17 Thread haskell-platform
#12: OpenAL doesn't work on Windows (without some tinkering) ---+ Reporter: refold | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Version: |Keywords: -

Re: [haskell-platform] #11: glut installation on Windows via cabal doesn't work by default

2009-04-17 Thread haskell-platform
#11: glut installation on Windows via cabal doesn't work by default ---+ Reporter: duncan |Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor |Milestone: Version: | Resolution:

Re: [haskell-platform] #6: Windows installer

2009-04-17 Thread haskell-platform
#6: Windows installer ---+ Reporter: duncan |Owner: refold Type: task| Status: assigned Priority: major |Milestone: Release 1: 2008.0.0 Version: | Resolutio

Re: [haskell-platform] #6: Windows installer

2009-04-17 Thread haskell-platform
#6: Windows installer ---+ Reporter: duncan |Owner: refold Type: task| Status: assigned Priority: major |Milestone: Release 1: 2008.0.0 Version: | Resolutio

Re: Stuff that needs doing

2009-04-17 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 13:14 -0400, Gregory Collins wrote: > Duncan Coutts writes: > > > We could for purely informational purposes list the versions of the > > core packages too but if so it's probably best to identify them in a > > separate list. > > For the first version it would make my life

Re: Stuff that needs doing

2009-04-17 Thread Duncan Coutts
(resending to the list) On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 17:24 +0100, Ross Paterson wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 06:05:51PM +0200, Duncan Coutts wrote: > > I guess we do not need to specifically list any of the "core" packages > > that come with ghc, we need only list the extra libraries. > > > > We cou