Re: [haskell-platform] #6: Windows installer

2009-04-22 Thread haskell-platform
#6: Windows installer --+- Reporter: duncan|Owner: refold Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: major |Milestone: Release 1: 2009.0.0 Component: Platform |

Re: [haskell-platform] #6: Windows installer

2009-04-22 Thread haskell-platform
#6: Windows installer --+- Reporter: duncan|Owner: refold Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: major |Milestone: Release 1: 2009.0.0 Component: Platform |

Re[4]: Windows installer - beta release

2009-04-22 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Mikhail, Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 5:00:09 PM, you wrote: >> btw, HP installer creates "Start menu/Haskell Platform/6.10.2" menu. may >> be it should be "Start menu/Haskell Platform/2009.0.0"? > The default value is "GHC/6.10.2" - I assume that you > changed "GHC" to "Haskell Platform" ma

Re: Re[2]: Windows installer - beta release

2009-04-22 Thread Mikhail Glushenkov
Hi Bulat, Bulat Ziganshin writes: > afair, ghc installs any version to "program files/ghc", successfully > overwriting previous one. if we want to support multiple ghc versions > installation, we shouldn't duplicate this behavior. Nope, it uses $SYSTEMDRIVE\GHC\ghc-${GHC_VERSION} by default. Q

Re[2]: Windows installer - beta release

2009-04-22 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Duncan, Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 3:10:18 PM, you wrote: > There is no problem with it being run from a directory with spaces. The > only problem is building it with a --prefix set to a dir with spaces, or > if the source tarball is in a dir with spaces. The existing installers > for ghc i

Re: Windows installer - beta release

2009-04-22 Thread Mikhail Glushenkov
Hi Duncan, > I think as far as possible we should be consistent with the existing ghc > installer. Yes, that was my intent. > And I think the existing ghc installer puts this directory (or perhaps > it's the /bin subdir) on the %PATH%. Yes, we also do that. > > I decided to use $SYSTEMDRIVE\g

Re: Windows installer - beta release

2009-04-22 Thread Mikhail Glushenkov
Hi Duncan, Duncan Coutts writes: > > * Installed files are not tracked precisely (we use the Windows > > analogue of rm -rf, which is a bit unsafe). > > Oh, so NSIS doesn't do uninstall? It does, but it's a bit tricky: http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Advanced_Uninstall_Log_NSIS_Header I hope t

Re: [haskell-platform] #12: OpenAL doesn't work on Windows (without some tinkering)

2009-04-22 Thread haskell-platform
#12: OpenAL doesn't work on Windows (without some tinkering) +--- Reporter: refold |Owner: SvenPanne Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major |Milestone: Component: OpenAL

Re: more package changes

2009-04-22 Thread Mikhail Glushenkov
Hi Duncan, 2009/4/22 Duncan Coutts : > Really? Oh, I was under the impression that OpenAL never worked on > Windows because it was using the wrong calling convention: > > http://trac.haskell.org/haskell-platform/ticket/12 Perhaps I didn't make myself clear in that ticket. OpenAL works on Windows

Re: Windows installer - beta release

2009-04-22 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 10:34 +, Mikhail Glushenkov wrote: > Hi Bulat, > > Bulat Ziganshin writes: > > > 1) afair, you use nsis? installer size too large, adding this line to > > .nsi should make it twice smaller: > > > > SetCompressor /SOLID lzma > > Thanks, I'll use that! > > > 2) i propo

Re: Windows installer - beta release

2009-04-22 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 21:42 +, Mikhail Glushenkov wrote: > Hi all, > > The beta version of the Windows installer is ready and can be > downloaded from > > http://code.haskell.org/~refold/HaskellPlatform-2009.0.0-setup.exe > > Please test and report any bugs you encounter. Good work Mikhail!

Re: more package changes

2009-04-22 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 10:20 +, Mikhail Glushenkov wrote: > Hi Duncan, > > Duncan Coutts writes: > > > We are inclined to drop OpenAL from this first release of the platform. > > The rationale is that we cannot use the released version because there > > are bugs preventing it from working on

Re: Re[2]: more package changes :-(

2009-04-22 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 14:27 +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: > Hello Ian, > > Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 2:12:25 PM, you wrote: > > > I don't think existing HP libraries should be exempt from new > > requirements in future HP releases. Either they should be fixed to meet > > the requirements, or the

Re: Windows installer - beta release

2009-04-22 Thread Mikhail Glushenkov
Hi Bulat, Bulat Ziganshin writes: > 1) afair, you use nsis? installer size too large, adding this line to > .nsi should make it twice smaller: > > SetCompressor /SOLID lzma Thanks, I'll use that! > 2) i propose to make default installation directory both for ghc and > extra libs the same, som

Re: more package changes :-(

2009-04-22 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 11:12 +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:11:57AM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote: > > > > though we will hopefully be setting the bar a little higher for new > > packages compared to the "extra libs" which get a bit of a free ride. > > I don't think existing HP

Re[2]: more package changes :-(

2009-04-22 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Ian, Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 2:12:25 PM, you wrote: > I don't think existing HP libraries should be exempt from new > requirements in future HP releases. Either they should be fixed to meet > the requirements, or they are not being maintained adequately and should > be removed from the H

Re: more package changes

2009-04-22 Thread Mikhail Glushenkov
Hi Duncan, Duncan Coutts writes: > We are inclined to drop OpenAL from this first release of the platform. > The rationale is that we cannot use the released version because there > are bugs preventing it from working on Windows and OSX. We could, at > very short notice, tag and release the darc

Re: more package changes :-(

2009-04-22 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:11:57AM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote: > > though we will hopefully be setting the bar a little higher for new > packages compared to the "extra libs" which get a bit of a free ride. I don't think existing HP libraries should be exempt from new requirements in future HP re

Re: Windows installer - beta release

2009-04-22 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Mikhail, Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 1:42:17 AM, you wrote: > The beta version of the Windows installer is ready and can be > downloaded from so: 1) afair, you use nsis? installer size too large, adding this line to .nsi should make it twice smaller: SetCompressor /SOLID lzma 2) i propo

Re: Windows installer - beta release

2009-04-22 Thread Mikhail Glushenkov
Hi Bulat, Bulat Ziganshin writes: > > * Installed files are not tracked precisely (we use the Windows > > analogue of rm -rf, which is a bit unsafe). > > are you use NSIS? i solved this problem by making list of all files > after installation and then including it into .nsi file Yep, there a

more package changes :-(

2009-04-22 Thread Duncan Coutts
Folks, The two changes below have not yet been made in the haskell-platform.cabal file or reflected on the wiki pages. This is an advance warning. OpenAL -- We are inclined to drop OpenAL from this first release of the platform. The rationale is that we cannot use the released version becaus

RE: Windows installer - beta release

2009-04-22 Thread Niemeijer, R.A.
> The beta version of the Windows installer is ready Excellent. Tested on XP SP2, everything seems to work fine. Now I'm finally able to make OpenGL programs in Haskell :) Tested the Gears.hs example from http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/GLUT/examples/Misc/ , which worked fine. Keep up the go