On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 06:32:30PM -0400, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> I thought about this. But I fear that this will require a language
> extension or flag, and then the developers (quite rightly) say that it
> does not pull its weight of supporting both variants, and it gets lost.
> But maybe I
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 08:21:43PM +0300, Vassil Ognyanov Keremidchiev wrote:
> Okay, sorry for taking your time about those propositions. I'm just
> thinking of ways for improving future Haskell. My feedback is mostly from
> talking with people and trying to teach them in Haskell.
As others, I
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:18:13PM +0200, Vassil Ognyanov Keremidchiev wrote:
> Hello!
>
> What do you think about an idea to have multiple imports on a single line,
> like:
>
> module MyApp where
> import Data.Text, Data.Foldable, Control.Concurrent
> ...
Hello Vassil,
how would qualified/as
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:09:56AM +0900, Matthias Fischmann wrote:
> just to be clarify for those who are still interested: i'm not
> suggesting we should *change* the process as much as *extend* it.
> once the committee has finalized haskell-prime, ask everybody
> (literally everybody) for a
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 07:33:41PM +0200, David Luposchainsky via Haskell-prime
wrote:
> The idea is that people talk about the proposals in the comments, and if we
> come
> to an agreement on a proposal, we merge the PR. This isn’t set in stone, but I
> felt like someone should get some form of
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:56:51PM +0200, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
> One benefit I see from using GitHub is that this way would we be closer
> to the Haskell community (given the majority of Hackage packages are
> hosted on GitHub), and our work would be more transparent for the
> community
