Re: Best way to install and work with Haskell

Hi Martin, Sorry completely missed your post in May!! haskell-devel list is largely just used for bugzilla mail these days, so better to post to the Fedora haskell list next time. On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Martin Cigorraga wrote: > I'm new to Haskell and I would like to know what would be

ghc-7.10 and F24 plans

Hi, I would like to move ghc to 7.10.2 for F24, and I have started working on this locally in the background: some needed version bumps have gone to package git already (but not koji - please don't build any unless you can do all the necessary legwork (ie rebuilding)). I also updated fhbuild in fe

Re: Request for update of Pandoc COPR

Hi Daniel, On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Daniel Miranda wrote: > Greetings, > I've recently came upon your Pandoc COPR, which has been hugely helpful to > me while writing my undergraduate dissertation. That's nice. :) > If it will not be too much of an abuse, I'd like to ask if it would be

Re: packaging "stack" for Fedora

Hi Sitaram, (I am copying the Fedora Haskell list since this may be interesting for others too.) I guess firstly you're after a newer version of hledger than the one available in Fedora? (BTW if you msg ".who owns hledger" in #fedora-devel - zodbot will tell you the owner directly.) I have a st

Re: packaging "stack" for Fedora

> > $ sudo dnf copr install petersen/stack Oops, s/install/enable/ > > $ sudo dnf install stack > > $ stack install hledger ___ haskell mailing list haskell@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Re: Copr group

Very sorry I have been busy and didn't see this mail until today... On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote: > Jens, do you want to create the haskell-sig group on Copr? We can move > updates there and make other repos for things like git-annex, yesod, and > hledger, It seems that I am

Re: ghc-7.10 and F24 plans

estion: how about we do a major cleanup now of Fedora Haskell packages and remove old incomplete stacks and anything that is not so essential to reduce the future workload of the SIG? We could move some less-essential package to Copr too if needed. On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:

Re: Packaging vty

Hi Jan, On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: > I'm trying to package vty [1] with all of its dependencies that are > currently not present in Fedora 24. I got stuck at adjunctions [2]: Cool, what do you want to use vty for? > Building adjunctions-4.3... Stackage is still using 4.

Fwd: slack setup fails

Forwarding to fedora Haskell list instead... -- Forwarded message -- From: Jens-Ulrik Petersen Date: Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:06 PM Subject: Re: slack setup fails To: Jan Synacek Hi Jan, Copying Fedora Haskell list since this might interest/affect other people too. (I have

Re: slack setup fails

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: >> "/home/jsynacek/.stack/programs/x86_64-linux/ghc-7.10.3/lib/ghc-7.10.3/bin/ghc-pkg: >> error while loading shared libraries: libtinfo.so.5: cannot open >&

ghc-7.10.3 for F25

Hi, I have quietly started working on ghc-7.10.3 for F25... There is a f25-ghc buildroot (sidetag) in Koji and ghc itself is already built. There are two critical package reviews urgently needed, due to ghc-7.10 no longer including the old-locale and old-time libraries: - old-locale: https://bu

Re: ghc-7.10.3 for F25

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: >> - old-locale: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263904 >> - old-time: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12639045 > I'll take a look. Thank you very much - you're awesome! Jens __

Re: ghc-7.10.3 for F25

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > I have quietly started working on ghc-7.10.3 for F25... > > There is a f25-ghc buildroot (sidetag) in Koji and ghc itself is already > built. Okay a quick update on progress. Nothing more built in koji yet, but lots of

Re: ghc-7.10.3 for F25

, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > The following packages fail to build for me: > > Agda > (dep bounds) update bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224825 ghc-IOSpec > 0.3 built - though this package could probably be dropped > ghc-cabal-

headsup: ghc-7.10.3 went into Rawhide

Hi! On behalf of the Fedora Haskell SIG, I am happy to announce that finally GHC 7.10 (7.10.3) has gone into Rawhide for F25. This is a new major release (though ghc-8.0.1 is already out for a little time now). The push comes also with a bunch of version updates including pandoc-1.17. You can re

Re: ghc-7.10.3 for F25

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Jens-Ulrik Petersen > wrote: > >> The following packages fail to build for me: >> > > >> Agda >> > > (dep bounds) > update bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.

ghc-8.0.1 news

Hi, There was a small Haskell SIG meeting at Flock 2016 where we talked a little about current workflow and plans for F26. Anyway while procrastinating on fixing the remaining F25 deps breakage, I spent a little time test-building with ghc-8.0.1 for F26... below are my results. I realized also a

Re: ghc-7.10.3 for F25

A few more updates, which I am in the process of backporting to F25: On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Jens-Ulrik Petersen > wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Jens-Ulrik Petersen > > wrote: >&g

HCAR report

Hi, I just updated our SIG's HCAR report for Nov 2016. https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/haskell-sig.git/tree/HCAR/FedoraHaskellSIG-JF.tex Please let me know if you have any additional updates or mentions you think should be included. Thanks, Jens ___

GHC 8.0

Hi, For your information I created and submitted the following initial proposal to update ghc to 8.0 for F26. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GHC_8.0 Feedback, and particularly offers of assistance most welcome. Thanks, Jens ___ haskell mailing

Re: Additional packages

Hi Róman, Great to hear from you. > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/romanofski/gtfsschedule/ Cool > There are only a few packages missing in Fedora like *conduit and > persistent* which would make my life easier. Sure, why not. > Since I'm also trying to get > more packaging exper

Re: Additional packages

Róman, BTW one thing you could do is to setup up a Copr repo with the packages you want. Copr is a great packaging playground. I think that might help you to get a better feel for the packaging too. Of course good to go ahead with the reviews too. Jens _

Re: Additional packages

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Róman Joost wrote: > Yeah I love copr. I already have one created: > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/romanofski/gtfsschedule/ Doh, so you did. Cool :-) ___ haskell mailing list -- haskell@lists.fedoraproject

Re: Bug in ghc-rpm-macros?

Hi, Róman, On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Róman Joost wrote: > I've build a new ghc-cassava package against F25 and was wondering if > either cabal-rpm generated a wrong spec file Essentially yes: thanks for the report. Sorry about that, I just released cabal-rpm-0.10.1 to Hackage which should

Re: ghc-7.10.3 for F25

[I forgot to send this final update mail on ghc-7.10.3 for F25, which is already released] [Sending this now just for the record] Final update on f25: On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Jens-Ulrik Petersen > wrote: > >>

ghc-8.0.2 and f26

Hi, Just a heads-up that I just started building for ghc-8.0.2 for F26 in Koji f26-ghc. I think the work will go on for the next week - still lots of work to do in git though I managed to build most of the major pieces for Rawhide locally already (except Agda and git-annex which seem to have many

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20170228.n.0 changes

Hi, ghc-8.0.2 went into F26/Rawhide yesterday! https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GHC_8.0 There is still some minor clean-up ongoing to fix some remaining breakage: > [Agda] > ghc-Agda-2.4.2.5-3.fc26.x86_64 requires > libHSQuickCheck-2.8.2-6TxL5Cx3o2p0HsyT59KWiD-ghc7.10.3.so()(64bi

HCAR May '17

Hi Haskell SIG, I had forgotten to post an update for the coming HCAR. I have just done that and pushed it to our new pagure repo: https://pagure.io/haskell-sig/blob/master/f/HCAR/FedoraHaskellSIG-JF.tex Let me know if I missed anything - I think it is still possible to update the entry by tomor

retiring git-annex

Hi, I think we need to retire git-annex from Fedora (the current version is very old and has security issues), since to build current versions needs adding a lot of new Haskell dependencies to Fedora. Currently noone has expressed interested in doing this... I plan to make a copr repo later at so

Re: Why does ghc-cryptohash build ghc-cryptonite and ghc-memory also?

Good question - the subpackaging is just a hack (and yes it is confusing sorry) to workaround packaging manpower basically. Package reviews for such subpackages are very welcome and will replace the subpackages in the long term, assuming the current detailed Package Review workflow continues. I d

Re: git-annex dependencies and co-maintainership

Hi Elliot, First a big thanks for all the packaging work you are doing to get git-annex finally updated in Fedora. :-) On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > As you may or may not have noticed, I've added about 50-60 new packages for > Haskell recently. These are all

Re: HCAR November 2017

Hi Mihai, This may be a bit late but I updated the Fedora Haskell entry. If there is still time to include it that would be great. Cheers, Jens On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Mihai Maruseac (HCAR editor) wrote: > Dear Jens, > > We are currently planning the upcoming November 2017 edition of

cabal-rpm-0.12

Hi, I released cabal-rpm-0.12 to Hackage yesterday, and have built it for F27+: it should reach the updates-testing repo soon. http://hackage.haskell.org/package/cabal-rpm-0.12/changelog The main changes are - queries Stackage LTS for package versions via https, falling back to Hackage for packa

Re: does Fedora attempt to follow any particular stack resolver?

On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 6:04 AM, Garrett Mitchener < garrett.mitche...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, I do a lot of development in Haskell. I generally end up using stack > to build it all, but unfortunately, that means stack always ends up > building slightly updated versions of a bunch of packages that

GHC 8.2 for F28

I have submitted a System Wide Change proposal for Fedora 28 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GHC_8.2 to update to ghc-8.2.2 and LTS 10 packages. More details to follow here. Not much left but I think we can make it. Jens ___ haskell mailing lis

Re: GHC and GHCi man pages?

Hi Sergio, Yeah, I opened a upstream bug, but seems it is a Fedora issue. (Not that the man pages are that complete as I recall - maybe they have improved?) Any help resolving that is most welcome! Thanks, Jens On 11 Jan 2018 7:03 am, "Sergio Losilla" wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that there are

Re: GHC and GHCi man pages?

ete, but better than nothing. > > I've never done anything like this :-D, so any hints where I should start? > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 2:05 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen > wrote: > >> Yeah, I opened a upstream bug, but seems it is a Fedora issue. (Not that >> the m

ghc82 and packages and f28 building update

Hi, I have been busy quietly building Haskell packages for F28 in the f28-ghc side repo. Overall it is going quite well but I have one serious packaging issue which I think needs the packaging of the data-default-instannces-* subpackages to be reviewed asap, I believe. There is an upstream ghc bug

Re: ghc82 and packages and f28 building update

On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > Also I would like to encourage Hackage package maintainers to try to > follow Stackage LTS versions rather than Hackage as far as possible, since > this will pretty much guarantee build consistency across our package set. &g

Re: ghc82 and packages and f28 building update

Hi Elliot, On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:10 AM, Elliott Sales de Andrade < quantum.anal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27 January 2018 at 15:42, Jens-Ulrik Petersen > wrote: > >> Overall it is going quite well but I have one serious packaging issue >> which I think need

Re: ghc82 and packages and f28 building update

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 2:26 AM, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:10 AM, Elliott Sales de Andrade < > quantum.anal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Also, I would point out this Change wrt running ldconfig: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remo

ghc 8.2 now in Rawhide

The Haskell SIG is pleased to announce that the ghc Haskell compiler has been updated from 8.0.2 to 8.2.2 in Fedora Rawhide (for more information see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GHC_8.2). Most Haskell packages have already been updated and/or rebuilt. A few remaining excepts are: darc

Re: ghc 8.2 now in Rawhide

On 4 Feb 2018 12:17 am, "Jens-Ulrik Petersen" wrote: > ghc-gi-ggit > ghc-gi-gio (these needs an upstream patch to ghc) > ghc-gi-ostree Unfortunately backporting the patch needs some work. https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/14396 > ghc-ltk I think we could just

To test or not to test testsuites?

Hi, I wanted to put out this question about our Fedora Haskell packages. Currently about 31 of our packages have their testsuites turned on. (I don't have figures for how many (of our) packages actually have testsuites: the rest are basically turned off due to missing test library dependencies.)

Fedora Haskell BoF at devconf.us?

I proposed a Fedora Haskell BoF at Devconf.us. Anyway else interested in helping to organize it with me? If you are, please respond or get in touch! Thanks, Jens ___ haskell mailing list -- haskell@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email t

Re: To test or not to test testsuites?

> > On 2 April 2018 at 03:58, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > >> (I think deleting the abi-depends field from every package .conf would >> fix this but that would require rebuilding everything and patching Cabal. >> Well a hack could be to add an RPM file trigger to d

Re: To test or not to test testsuites?

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 6:14 PM, Elliott Sales de Andrade < quantum.anal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Are you saying it's our bug that the hash changes? I find it a bit weird > that the hash changes. I tried building with and without, and nothing > changed in the required shared libraries. So I wonder

Re: HCAR May 2018

Hi Mihai, Sorry I am late again, but here is the HCAR update for Fedora Haskell. Thanks a lot! Jens On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:10 PM, Mihai Maruseac (HCAR editor) < mihai.marus...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Jens, > > We are currently planning the upcoming May 2018 edition of the Haskel > Commun

Re: HCAR May 2018

Sorry let me add one more sentence. Thanks, Jens On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > Hi Mihai, > > Sorry I am late again, but here is the HCAR update for Fedora Haskell. > > Thanks a lot! > > Jens > > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:10 P

Stackage LTS 11 for F29

Hi, Stackage LTS 11 is still on ghc-8.2.2 (and ghc-8.4.3 was just released). F28 is basically based on LTS 10. So my current thinking is that for F29 we should just update our package set to LTS 11. (As you may know cabal-rpm looks at latest LTS (on F27+) rather than directly at Hackage.) URM sh

Re: Goals of the Fedora Haskell project?

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 8:52 AM Robb Shecter wrote: > I joined because I use Haskell on Fedora as my development environment. > But is this project aimed at Haskell for developers? It's kind of hard for > me to tell. E.g., I use Stack. And to install it on Fedora, I go to the > Stack website and

Fedora Haskell at Flock

I proposed a Haskell SIG session at Flock: https://pagure.io/flock/issue/91 Do chime on the ticket if you are interested in helping, etc. I believe a general SIGs session is also planned where I want us to be present of course. The final schedule is not announced yet. Any others planning to be at

first SIG meeting

After so many years I would like to do a first Haskell SIG meeting on Freenode. Who is interested in attending? Topics could include ghc-8.4.3 for F30, etc. Once we have a better idea of who wants to attend and timezones, we can try to find an appropriate time. Thanks, Jens _

ghc module and static linking for executable packages

Hi, I am pleased to announce there is now a ghc module in updates-testing-modular for F28 and F29: it provides ghc-8.4.3 (the module stream is called 8.4). I am planning to add a 8.6 stream too. (The Rawhide module has not appeared yet - not sure why.) In conjunction with this, I am planning to di

Re: ghc module and static linking for executable packages

e the only Fedora package not using Cabal is hedgewars.) Jens On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 5:51 PM Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > Hi, I am pleased to announce there is now a ghc module in > updates-testing-modular for F28 and F29: it provides ghc-8.4.3 (the module > stream is called 8.4). I am pl

ghc module and Haskell static linked executables

Hi, A heads-up that I am planning to move Haskell executables to static linking in F30. This to improve the experience with the new ghc module: currently most of the Haskell executables (except hscolour and hedgewars I believe) are dynamically linked which conflicts with modular ghc, making it pai

ghc Coprs: X.Y or X.Y.Z?

Hi, For a while I have been wondering if it wouldn't be better just to do one ghc Copr per major GHC release rather than one for each minor release... (eg petersen/ghc-8.8 rather than petersen/8.8.1 etc). The argument being that then you will automatically get updated to new minor ghc releases as

Packages that can be dropped

The following libraries seem not used by any other packages and are missing from Stackage LTS 12: ghc-HSH ghc-IOSpec ghc-IfElse ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl ghc-MonadCatchIO-transformers ghc-Stream ghc-arrows ghc-attempt ghc-attoparsec-enumerator ghc-aws (ghc-bdcs) (ghc-bdcs-api) ghc-blaze-builder-enumera

Re: Packages that can be dropped

Thanks Elliot, On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 5:39 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade < quantum.anal...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't know if this list is correct. git-annex uses, e.g., ghc-aws, > ghc-esqueleto, ghc-fdo-notify, etc. Good catch - this is because F29 updates is already doing static linking of Ha

GHC 8.4 Change proposal

Hi Haskell SIG, I just have prepared this Change proposal for F30: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GHC_8.4 Feedback is welcome, as well as offers of assistance if you are able to help. Thanks, Jens ___ haskell mailing list -- haskell@lists.fedo

Re: GHC 8.4 Change proposal

On Sun, 3 Feb 2019, 11:26 Elliott Sales de Andrade < quantum.anal...@gmail.com wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 20:10, Jens-Ulrik Petersen > wrote: > > I just have prepared this Change proposal for F30: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GHC_8.4 > >

Re: Packages that can be dropped

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 4:43 PM Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > Thanks Elliot, > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 5:39 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade < > quantum.anal...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I don't know if this list is correct. git-annex uses, e.g., ghc-aws, >&

Re: Packages that can be dropped

-numbers ghc-pattern-arrows ghc-prelude-extras ghc-ranges ghc-readline ghc-rosezipper ghc-string-qq ghc-stringsearch ghc-union-find ghc-utf8-light ghc-wl-pprint (packages on the same lines are dependent (reverse deps)) On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 12:40 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2

Re: GHC 8.4 Change proposal

which should correspond to the final f30 packaging. Let me know if you have questions or concerns, Jens On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 9:09 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > Hi Haskell SIG, > > I just have prepared this Change proposal for F30: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/

Re: GHC 8.4 Change proposal

Hi, Everything is built now in f30-ghc: waiting for releng to tag the builds to f30 and f31. With the move to ghc-8.4 I am planning to retire the following groups of packages: [enumerator is long deprecated and no longer builds out of the box] ghc-attoparsec-enumerator ghc-blaze-builder-enumerat

planning ghc-8.6/lts13 for F31

Hi Haskell SIG, Well I just finished ghc-8.4 and lts12 for F30 but I am already starting to think about F31... and hope we can start work on this earlier this time so it doesn't land it so late this time. I should really really write down the whole process in a blog post or wiki page, hopefully

Re: GHC 8.4 Change proposal

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 11:49 PM Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > With the move to ghc-8.4 I am planning to retire the following groups of > packages: > > [enumerator is long deprecated and no longer builds out of the box] > ghc-attoparsec-enumerator > ghc-blaze-builder-enumerato

Re: GHC 8.4 Change proposal

On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 11:53 PM Brian C. Lane wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 11:39:16AM -0400, Christopher Lumens wrote: > > > [weldr packages FTBFS since 8.2] > > > > ghc-bdcs-api > > > > ghc-bdcs > > > > ghc-conduit-combinators > > > > ghc-content-store > > > > > > > > > > Chris, David, Weldr

ghc alternatives and triggers

Hi, Any objections to dropping the alternatives for runhaskell and hsc2hs in Rawhide at this time? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640056 Also a heads-up that I am planning to move to rpm triggers in ghc-compiler for updating the ghc-pkg cache instead of the current post/postun scrip

GHC 8.6 Change

Hi Haskell SIG, I have just proposed https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GHC_8.6 for F31. I have been doing some preparation for this, but there is still more work to do: I hope to start building next week in earnest. Note I am also planning some noticeable packaging changes this time around:

Re: I would like to have dhall-haskell in Fedora, have questions

Hi Adam, great questions On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 8:18 PM Adam Saleh wrote: > I have been using https://dhall-lang.org/ for some of my > openshift/kubernetes configuration, like it much more than writing out > YAML, and I would like to have it available in Fedora. > Cool, dhall is nice > I am m

Re: I would like to have dhall-haskell in Fedora, have questions

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:09 PM Adam Saleh wrote: > Tristan, awesome, I might be using the binaries in the meanwhile. I still > would like to get a real srpm going :-) > I have created: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/dhall/ If people could test it that would be great. > Jens

Re: I would like to have dhall-haskell in Fedora, have questions

Thanks a lot, I merged and have updated my copr. Jens On Sat, 8 Feb 2020, 03:40 Tristan de CACQUERAY, wrote: > Hi Jens, > > that version is quite old (1.19.1 is from 2018), and it is missing the > `json-to-dhall` utility. > Here is a tentative bump here: > https://github.com/fedora-haskell/dhal

Re: I would like to have dhall-haskell in Fedora, have questions

I also add dhall- yaml to the packaging. :) I forgot to follow up here. :) Let me know if spot anything else. Jens ___ haskell mailing list -- haskell@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to haskell-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora C

Re: I would like to have dhall-haskell in Fedora, have questions

Sorry keep missing the mails... On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:24 AM Tristan Cacqueray wrote: > would it possible to also include the Dhall devel files too? > Can you expand on the use-case? The short answer for the current copr is that it is not so easy but let me think on it. I think better to g

Re: I would like to have dhall-haskell in Fedora, have questions

Or what did you mean by devel files exactly? Jens ___ haskell mailing list -- haskell@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to haskell-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code

update on F32 progress

Hi Haskell SIG, Sorry for the lack of communication: I think this time I forgot to send out a heads-up about F32 plans, which also got a little delayed in the end but are now completed in f32 at least (but not yet tagged into Rawhide) https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b0652e4f4b

Re: I would like to have dhall-haskell in Fedora, have questions

I think I also replied already in github, but for the record: On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 8:52 PM Tristan Cacqueray wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 18:16 Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > > Or what did you mean by devel files exactly? > > I meant the files that enable using the haskell

Re: update on F32 progress

The first link was supposed to be to the F32 Change: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Haskell_Stackage_LTS_14 :) ___ haskell mailing list -- haskell@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to haskell-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedor

Re: update on F32 progress

On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 1:20 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > TL;DR *Please do not build anything now* (into Rawhide) until the f32 > builds get tagged to f33 too. I will send a follow-up mail once I see that > releng has done that. > Koji buildroots for Rawhide and F32 should hav

First SIG meeting

I would like to propose we have our first official Fedora Haskell SIG meeting next week. We could start biweekly perhaps, I hope there will be interest. Getting more people involved and interested will be really beneficial. I setup . I

reminder Haskell SIG irc meeting starting today 12:00 UTC

Reminder that we have a SIG meeting starting in 80 minutes in #fedora-meeting on Freenode Agenda: - welcome greetings - plans for f33 - revised Packaging Guidelines - current and pending package reviews - open floor Do join if you have time! Thanks, Jens _

revised Haskell Packaging Guidelines

Hi Everyone, I am happy to share that the FPC approved the updating of the Fedora Haskell Packaging Guidelines. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Haskell/ So they should now be in line with current cabal-rpm-2.0 packaging, ie including doc and prof subpackages for librari

Haskell SIG meeting

Hi, there is a Haskell SIG meeting taking place in about 8.5 hours: Time: Tue 14th April 2020, 13:00 UTC Channel: Freenode #fedora-meeting Topics: - plans for Fedora 33 - open floor Thanks, Jens ps feedback is also welcome on the meeting time and day

Re: Haskell SIG meeting

Here is the log from the meeting: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2020-04-14/haskell-sig.2020-04-14-13.01.log.html Next meeting will be in 2 weeks time. Thanks, Jens ___ haskell mailing list -- haskell@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubsc

Haskell SIG meeting, 2020 April 28

Hi, There will be a Haskell SIG meeting taking place tomorrow: Time: Tue 28th April 2020, 13:00 UTC Channel: Freenode #fedora-meeting Topics: - plans and work for Fedora 33 - open floor Thanks, Jens ___ haskell mailing list -- haskell@lists.fedoraproje

Re: Haskell SIG meeting, 2020 April 28

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 9:40 PM Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > There will be a Haskell SIG meeting taking place tomorrow: > Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2020-04-28/haskell-sig.2020-04-28-13.01.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meetin

Haskell SIG meeting, 2020-05-12

Here are the minutes and log from today's meeting: Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2020-05-12/haskell-sig.2020-05-12-13.01.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2020-05-12/haskell-sig.2020-05-12-13.01.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.

Fedora Haskell SIG irc meeting in 15min

Last minute reminder that the Fedora Haskell SIG biweekly meeting is starting in 15 minutes in #fedora-meeting Thanks, Jens ___ haskell mailing list -- haskell@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to haskell-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Haskell SIG meeting, 2020-05-26

Minutes and logs from today's meeting: Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2020-05-26/haskell-sig.2020-05-26-13.02.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2020-05-26/haskell-sig.2020-05-26-13.02.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-m

Haskell SIG meeting, 2020-06-09

Minutes and log from today's meeting: Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2020-06-09/haskell-sig.2020-06-09-13.01.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2020-06-09/haskell-sig.2020-06-09-13.01.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-me

ghc-8.8 and lts-16 for F33

Hi, I have started work on updating our Haskell packages for ghc-8.8.3 and Stackage LTS 16 (which was just recently released). Also a lot of fixes and improvements to cabal-rpm coming soon in 2.0.6. Currently I am building all the packages locally to make sure everything works before proceeding t

Re: ghc-8.8 and lts-16 for F33

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:18 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > Is someone able to help review ghc-network-bsd, which is needed by quite a > few packages with network-3: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849255 > Oops, my bad: Tristan already kindly took this over the

Re: ghc-8.8 and lts-16 for F33

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:18 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > I have started work on updating our Haskell packages for ghc-8.8.3 and > Stackage LTS 16 (which was just recently released). Also a lot of fixes and > improvements to cabal-rpm coming soon in 2.0.6. > Currently I am buil

Re: ghc-8.8 and lts-16 for F33

Ah and there are a few additional package reviews needed by more than one package, that would be help with this effort: ghc-bitarray (NEW) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850146 (and ghc-unicode-transforms, which needs this, to follow) ghc-filepattern (NEW) https://bugzilla.redhat.c

Re: ghc-8.8 and lts-16 for F33

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:53 PM Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > I have most of this is ready now locally on my machine (just working on > the last harder package cases) - so probably by next week I expect to start > building everything into a koji sidetag. > The remaining straggler

reminder of Haskell SIG meeting

We will have the biweekly Haskell SIG meeting in #fedora-meeting 70min from now: at 13:00 UTC (ie 9am EDT, 3pm CEST). The main topic will be preparation work for Fedora 33. Anyone interested in Haskell on Fedora is welcome to join or listen in. Thanks, Jens __

Haskell SIG meeting 2020-07-07 minutes

Minutes and log from today's meeting: Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2020-07-07/haskell-sig.2020-07-07-13.01.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2020-07-07/haskell-sig.2020-07-07-13.01.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-me

Re: Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal: GHC 8.8 and Haskell Stackage LTS 16

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:44 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GHC_8.8_and_LTS16 On behave of the Haskell SIG I am happy to announce that ghc-8.8.4 and Stackage 16.5 based Haskell packages have now been pushed to Rawhide. Jens __

Haskell SIG meeting 2020-07-21 minutes

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2020-07-21/haskell-sig.2020-07-21-13.03.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2020-07-21/haskell-sig.2020-07-21-13.03.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2020-07-21/haskell-sig.2020-07-

  1   2   >