Re: Why does ghc-cryptohash build ghc-cryptonite and ghc-memory also?
Hi Ben, On 11 August 2017 at 07:35, Ben Boeckel wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 16:20:59 +1000, Róman Joost wrote: > > Btw. I'm also happy to do some reviewing. The last once I was interested > > in tho were missing updated spec files (the ones posted ended up in a > > 404). > > Yeah, sorry about that. My hosting admin hasn't responded about hooking > up the vhost. I also haven't had time for Fedora much at all lately > either :( . I'll try and upload the packages I have reviews for to fp.o > and that have been pinged this weekend (Sunday is probably the earliest > you'll see them). > > As I was recently sponsored, I've made a comment on all your review requests that are 404 and I'd be willing to review. I also added a note if I know it to be outdated as well. > --Ben > ___ > haskell mailing list -- haskell@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to haskell-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Elliott ___ haskell mailing list -- haskell@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to haskell-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Why does ghc-cryptohash build ghc-cryptonite and ghc-memory also?
Dear Ben, On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 07:35:57AM -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 16:20:59 +1000, Róman Joost wrote: > > Btw. I'm also happy to do some reviewing. The last once I was interested > > in tho were missing updated spec files (the ones posted ended up in a > > 404). > > Yeah, sorry about that. My hosting admin hasn't responded about hooking > up the vhost. I also haven't had time for Fedora much at all lately > either :( . I'll try and upload the packages I have reviews for to fp.o > and that have been pinged this weekend (Sunday is probably the earliest > you'll see them). No reason to be sorry. I also have sporadic peaks of spare time I can spent on some of these, so don't worry. Thank you for filing the reviews in the first place. Kind Regards, -- Róman Joost Senior Software Engineer, Products & Technologies Operations (Brisbane) Red Hat signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ haskell mailing list -- haskell@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to haskell-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Why does ghc-cryptohash build ghc-cryptonite and ghc-memory also?
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 16:20:59 +1000, Róman Joost wrote: > Btw. I'm also happy to do some reviewing. The last once I was interested > in tho were missing updated spec files (the ones posted ended up in a > 404). Yeah, sorry about that. My hosting admin hasn't responded about hooking up the vhost. I also haven't had time for Fedora much at all lately either :( . I'll try and upload the packages I have reviews for to fp.o and that have been pinged this weekend (Sunday is probably the earliest you'll see them). --Ben ___ haskell mailing list -- haskell@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to haskell-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Why does ghc-cryptohash build ghc-cryptonite and ghc-memory also?
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 02:04:42AM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > I could help with reviews, but cannot approve anything without being > sponsored. Btw. I'm also happy to do some reviewing. The last once I was interested in tho were missing updated spec files (the ones posted ended up in a 404). So if there are specific ones, let me know :) Kind Regards, -- Róman Joost Senior Software Engineer, Products & Technologies Operations (Brisbane) Red Hat signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ haskell mailing list -- haskell@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to haskell-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Why does ghc-cryptohash build ghc-cryptonite and ghc-memory also?
Hi Jens, I am packaging git-annex in a copr [1]. As I'm sure you're aware, it requires ~100 dependent packages. When one package fails to build, it's usually because some dependencies are built against some differing versions of _another_ dependency. Thus I need to figure out where these packages originate and possibly grab the source to rebuild in the copr. This is made more difficult by them being "invisible". I could help with reviews, but cannot approve anything without being sponsored. [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/qulogic/git-annex/ On 8 August 2017 at 07:28, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > Good question - the subpackaging is just a hack (and yes it is confusing > sorry) to workaround packaging manpower basically. > > Package reviews for such subpackages are very welcome and will replace the > subpackages in the long term, assuming the current detailed Package Review > workflow continues. > > I didn't understand from your mail what led you to post this question? > > Hope that helps, > > Jens > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Elliott Sales de Andrade < > quantum.anal...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The ghc-cryptohash packages builds both ghc-cryptonite and ghc-memory >> [1]. Why is this the case? >> >> >> I spent a long time trying to figure out where I was getting ghc-memory >> from when it could not be found on packages [2], koji [3], bodhi [4], or >> release-monitoring [5]. It's only when I looked for the RPM on koji did I >> figure out it's a subpackage, because that's just totally unexpected, >> especially because there's an open review request for it [6]. >> >> [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/ghc-cryptohash.git/t >> ree/ghc-cryptohash.spec#n20 >> [2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/s/ghc-memory >> [3] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?match=glob&type=p >> ackage&terms=ghc-memory >> [4] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=ghc-memory >> [5] https://release-monitoring.org/projects/search/?pattern=memory >> [6] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=ghc-memory >> > > ___ > haskell mailing list -- haskell@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to haskell-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > -- Elliott ___ haskell mailing list -- haskell@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to haskell-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Why does ghc-cryptohash build ghc-cryptonite and ghc-memory also?
Good question - the subpackaging is just a hack (and yes it is confusing sorry) to workaround packaging manpower basically. Package reviews for such subpackages are very welcome and will replace the subpackages in the long term, assuming the current detailed Package Review workflow continues. I didn't understand from your mail what led you to post this question? Hope that helps, Jens On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Elliott Sales de Andrade < quantum.anal...@gmail.com> wrote: > The ghc-cryptohash packages builds both ghc-cryptonite and ghc-memory [1]. > Why is this the case? > > > I spent a long time trying to figure out where I was getting ghc-memory > from when it could not be found on packages [2], koji [3], bodhi [4], or > release-monitoring [5]. It's only when I looked for the RPM on koji did I > figure out it's a subpackage, because that's just totally unexpected, > especially because there's an open review request for it [6]. > > [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/ghc-cryptohash.git/t > ree/ghc-cryptohash.spec#n20 > [2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/s/ghc-memory > [3] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?match=glob&type= > package&terms=ghc-memory > [4] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=ghc-memory > [5] https://release-monitoring.org/projects/search/?pattern=memory > [6] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=ghc-memory > ___ haskell mailing list -- haskell@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to haskell-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org