Re: [HCP-Users] Converting/analysing preprocessed rfMRI grayordinates

2014-09-11 Thread K. Wagstyl
Thanks that's really helpful. Using this info I can load into matlab and with vertices in the 32k fs_LR space. The last hurdle is registering subject-space freesurfer vertices surface to the 32k fs_LR vertices, so that I can transfer the labels over to workbench. The caret wiki mentions a

[HCP-Users] Subject directories missing from connectome in a box

2014-09-11 Thread Estrid Jakobsen
Dear all, We recently received the updated connectome in a box with the new 500 subject release. I've noticed that four subjects, which were previously included in data downloaded from connectomeDB, are missing from the new data. I was wondering if these subjects have been removed on purpose

Re: [HCP-Users] Subject directories missing from connectome in a box

2014-09-11 Thread Harms, Michael
Hi, The omission of those 4 subjects from the 500 subject release was intentional. For the first 3 of those subjects, they didn't have gradient-echo fieldmaps to accompany the structurals. The GE fieldmaps are not mandatory for running the structurals through the HCP pipelines, but we didn't

Re: [HCP-Users] Subject directories missing from connectome in a box

2014-09-11 Thread Estrid Jakobsen
Thanks for the information. The issues and fixes page suggests that the reconstruction artifact for subject 727654 only pertains to the emotion task data (https://wiki.humanconnectome.org/display/PublicData/HCP+Data+Release+Updates%3A+Known+Issues+and+Planned+fixes). Is this correct, or would

Re: [HCP-Users] Subject directories missing from connectome in a box

2014-09-11 Thread Harms, Michael
Hi Estrid, First, we highly recommend that users do not mix subjects between data releases that were processed using different pipelines, which is the case for the 500 Subject and earlier Q3 releases. Subject 727654 was not included in the 500 Subject release for the reason that I outlined. So,