Re: [HCP-Users] visualisation via WB

2015-07-10 Thread David Van Essen
Munira, We will soon (hopefully in a week or two) be releasing the materials for the week-long HCP course given last month in Honolulu. This will include practicals and associated datasets (plus lecture notes) for all of the HCP modalities covered in the course, including MEG. It is likely th

Re: [HCP-Users] HCP PTN release: Clustered RSN on 200 ICA

2015-07-10 Thread Stephen Smith
Hi The call (using FSLNets) to do the hierarchical clustering is briefly mentioned in the PTN documentation - see the section on: "view hierarchical clustering of nodes" But as this is primarily just a convenient way of displaying the netmats we did not include the outputs of that in the PTN re

Re: [HCP-Users] visualisation via WB

2015-07-10 Thread Timothy Coalson
The MEG data uses a different surface resolution than the MRI data, so the MRI spec file and data cannot be visualized in the same instance of workbench. You were on the right track with what you did first, opening the *.surf.gii and related MEG data files. You may need to switch the viewing mode

[HCP-Users] visualisation via WB

2015-07-10 Thread Munira Khamitova
Hello, I have a problem with visualisation using Connectome Workbench. Could you give me some instructions what should I do in my case, please? First, I took MEG data of resting state for a subject from 500 Subjects+MEG2 Release and applied to it all pipelines described in the Reference Ma

Re: [HCP-Users] Easy way to have PreFreeSurferBatch.sh not process the T2w?

2015-07-10 Thread Daniel P. Bliss
Thanks for the reply. I've made some edits to the PreFreeSurfer pipeline that allow me to run it without the T2 or the field map, and I'm wondering whether they're sensible. Specifically, I've 1) Set AvgrdcSTRING to "NONE" in PreFreeSurferPipelineBatch.sh. 2) Set Modalities to "T1w" in PreFreeS

Re: [HCP-Users] probtrackx2 surface tracking in matrix2 mode

2015-07-10 Thread Moises Hernandez Fernandez
Missing: --target3='seeds' Moises On 10 July 2015 at 14:48, Maarten Vaessen wrote: > I tried this and here I get the error: > > Done loading samples. > does not exist > > Using the command: > probtrackx2 -x L.STS.fsl.gii --onewaycondition --omatrix3 > --lrtarget3=../fsaverage_LR32k/1028

Re: [HCP-Users] probtrackx2 surface tracking in matrix2 mode

2015-07-10 Thread Maarten Vaessen
I tried this and here I get the error: Done loading samples. does not exist Using the command: probtrackx2 -x L.STS.fsl.gii --onewaycondition --omatrix3 --lrtarget3=../fsaverage_LR32k/102816.L.white.32k_fs_LR.surf.gii -P 50 --forcedir --dir=./test_surf_track_STS_Lwhite -s ../Diffusion.bedpostX/m

Re: [HCP-Users] probtrackx2 surface tracking in matrix2 mode

2015-07-10 Thread Moises Hernandez Fernandez
Hi Maarten, you can use Matrix3: --omatrix3 --target3='seeds' --lrtarget3='wholebrain' Best, Moises. On 10 July 2015 at 11:12, Maarten Vaessen wrote: > Thanks for the reply. I am using FSL v5.0.8, but have also tried with > 5.0.6. > > Does that mean that there is no way to do seed-to-wholebra

Re: [HCP-Users] probtrackx2 surface tracking in matrix2 mode

2015-07-10 Thread Maarten Vaessen
Thanks for the reply. I am using FSL v5.0.8, but have also tried with 5.0.6. Does that mean that there is no way to do seed-to-wholebrain connectivity based on surfaces right now? Or is it possible to do a similar thing using one of the other --omatrix options? -M On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:49 PM