Re: [HCP-Users] CMRR vs MGH multiband/SMS sequences

; Date: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 at 6:25 AM To: "Harms, Michael" <mha...@wustl.edu<mailto:mha...@wustl.edu>> Cc: "HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org>" <HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org>> Su

Re: [HCP-Users] CMRR vs MGH multiband/SMS sequences

> <aruls...@gmail.com> > Date: Friday, July 14, 2017 at 8:25 AM > To: "Juranek, Jenifer" <jenifer.jura...@uth.tmc.edu> > Cc: "HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org" <HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org> > Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] CMRR vs MGH multiband/SMS s

Re: [HCP-Users] CMRR vs MGH multiband/SMS sequences

July 14, 2017 at 8:25 AM To: "Juranek, Jenifer" <jenifer.jura...@uth.tmc.edu<mailto:jenifer.jura...@uth.tmc.edu>> Cc: "HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org>" <HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org&g

Re: [HCP-Users] CMRR vs MGH multiband/SMS sequences

g<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org>> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] CMRR vs MGH multiband/SMS sequences And please let us know if you figured it out which sequence is better. Thank you, Mahmoud On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@w

Re: [HCP-Users] CMRR vs MGH multiband/SMS sequences

And please let us know if you figured it out which sequence is better. Thank you, Mahmoud On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Glasser, Matthew wrote: > I am not part of such a consensus. I don’t know if there have been > rigorous comparison of the two sequences or by what

Re: [HCP-Users] CMRR vs MGH multiband/SMS sequences

I am not part of such a consensus. I don’t know if there have been rigorous comparison of the two sequences or by what metrics it is being asserted that MGH outperforms CMRR. Perhaps you could ask your source for this recommendation why they say that? Peace, Matt. From: