Actually, -label-resample, and -cifti-resample with dlabel input, do not
need -largest to do the right thing, and you may still want to use adaptive
barycentric resampling for them - when given label data and not using
-largest, resampling uses a popularity measure (for each vertex, make sums
of th
Estrid,
If I can chime in here, when we created the HCP-500 hard disks, we had to
completely reorder which subjects went on which drives. With additional
newly-formatted data, we could not fit the original sets of subjects onto these
4TB disks in a way that corresponded with a "Q1, Q2, Q3..." or
You can use the wb_command -???-resample commands for this purpose. The
current sphere would be the
${StudyFolder}/${Subject}/MNINonLinear/Native/${Subject}.${Hemisphere}.sphe
re.MSMSulc.native.surf.gii and the new sphere would be
${StudyFolder}/${Subject}/MNINonLinear/fsaverage_LR32k/${Subject}.$
Hi Estrid,
When I look this list of subjects up in ConnectomeDB, I get the following:
Subject Release
298051 Q2
397760 Q2
414229 Q2
499566 Q1
654754 Q2
672756 Q1
What "Release" means in ConnectomeDB is the HCP Data Release in which thi
Hi Michael,
Thanks again. I am only using data from the Q3 release for this particular
analysis, and will exclude subject 727654.
Perhaps you can clarify another issue regarding the different release versions.
Is it possible that some subjects, which are listed in the Q4 and Q5
directories of
Hi Estrid,
First, we highly recommend that users do not mix subjects between data
releases that were processed using different pipelines, which is the case
for the "500 Subject" and earlier "Q3" releases. Subject 727654 was not
included in the 500 Subject release for the reason that I outlined.
Thanks for the information. The issues and fixes page suggests that the
reconstruction artifact for subject 727654 only pertains to the emotion task
data
(https://wiki.humanconnectome.org/display/PublicData/HCP+Data+Release+Updates%3A+Known+Issues+and+Planned+fixes).
Is this correct, or would y
Hi,
The omission of those 4 subjects from the 500 subject release was
intentional.
For the first 3 of those subjects, they didn't have gradient-echo
fieldmaps to accompany the structurals. The GE fieldmaps are not
mandatory for running the structurals through the HCP pipelines, but we
didn't get
Hi,
See the PostFreeSurfer scripts in the just released HCP Pipelines v3.4
https://github.com/Washington-University/Pipelines
https://github.com/Washington-University/Pipelines/releases
cheers,
-MH
--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
---
Conte Center
Dear all,
We recently received the updated "connectome in a box" with the new 500 subject
release. I've noticed that four subjects, which were previously included in
data downloaded from connectomeDB, are missing from the new data. I was
wondering if these subjects have been removed on purpose
Thanks that's really helpful. Using this info I can load into matlab and
with vertices in the 32k fs_LR space.
The last hurdle is registering subject-space freesurfer vertices surface
to the 32k fs_LR vertices, so that I can transfer the labels over to
workbench.
The caret wiki mentions a freesu
11 matches
Mail list logo
