Hi HCP team,
I downloaded HCP script and I’m using that for anatomy image preprocessing and
running FREESURFER.
But, I received errors in one of steps in recon-all.
I analyzed 111 individual subjects' T1 data using same method, but there are
errors in only 14 subjects…
I asked the error to
Ah okay; remeaning as you suggested works well (restores the expected
Tmean/Tsd). Thanks!
From: Glasser, Matthew [glass...@wustl.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 8:40 PM
To: Ely, Benjamin; HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
Cc: Brown, Tim
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users]
Ugg, I thought we fixed that. You can take the mean image from the uncleaned
data and add it to the cleaned data to have the mean present if you need it for
some reason. Remember if you are concatenating across scans you will need to
have the data demeaned.
Peace,
Matt.
From:
Okay good to know. Thank you Matt.
-Tim
Timothy Hendrickson
Department of Psychiatry
University of Minnesota
Office: 612-624-6441
Mobile: 507-259-3434 (texts okay)
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Glasser, Matthew
wrote:
> I think it is okay to over write for those
I think it is okay to over write for those pipelines. For the structural
pipelines you cannot rerun FreeSurfer after running PostFreeSurfer.
Matt.
From: Timothy Hendrickson >
Date: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 at 4:26 PM
To: Matt Glasser
Darn. Alright I will reprocess the fMRI and DTI data. It sounds like the
structural pipeline has not been changed so I would not have to reprocess
that right?
I am curious are the pipelines associated with the fMRI and DTI data smart
enough to overwrite data files or do I have to totally delete
I had a look over this and there are some important changes for fMRIVolume
(change in the way bias field correction is done) and potentially also some
changes in the diffusion pipeline. While it would probably work fine, I would
recommend rerunning if it isn’t too painful.
Peace,
Matt.
Hi HCP team,
The FIX-denoised 7T data released by the HCP appear to have a mean intensity of
~0, versus 10,000 for the pre-FIX 7T data due to intensity normalization. By
contrast, the most recently released 3T data from the HCP retain a mean value
of ~10,000 following the ICA-FIX step. Is this
I’ll respond to this when I have a bit more info.
Peace,
Matt.
From:
>
on behalf of Timothy Hendrickson >
Date: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 at 11:07 AM
To: "Harms,
I can see that several changes/additions have been made to 3.21, but I
asked whether there is a difference in *just* the minimal preprocessing
pipelines (i.e. PreFreeSurfer, FreeSurfer, PostFreeSurfer, fMRIVolume,
fMRISurface, and Diffusion) between 3.4.0 and 3.21.
I can ask this a different way,
There have been a lot of changes/additions from 3.4.0 to 3.21. If you are
starting a new study, it would be preferable for you to start with the latest
version.
cheers,
-MH
--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
---
Conte Center for the Neuroscience
Hi Andrew,
To be clear, ICA-FIX may not improve task fMRI data when it is run separately
on each tfMRI scan. MELODIC separates signal from noise better when there are
tons of time points going into the ICA, which isn’t always the case with single
tfMRI scans. Also, the confound regression will
Hello,
I have been using version 3.4.0 of the HCP Minimal Preprocessing Pipeline
to process my HCP compatible data.
I've used 3.4.0 to run the structural (PreFreeSurfer, FreeSurfer,
PostFreeSurfer), fMRI (fMRIVolume, and fMRISurface), and diffusion
sub-pipelines. I have now downloaded version
13 matches
Mail list logo