Re: [HCP-Users] Maximal number of unrelated subjects that have complete 3T resting state and task data

2017-06-30 Thread David Hofmann
Hi Michael, sounds good! Could you send me a link to the database/files or how to obtain the restricted data. I found an older link, which does not work anymore: http://www.humanconnectome.org/study/hcp-young-adult/data-releases/data-use-terms/restricted-access-overview.html Thank you

Re: [HCP-Users] Maximal number of unrelated subjects that have complete 3T resting state and task data

2017-06-30 Thread Harms, Michael
Hi, No plans to provide such a subject group in the interface, but it is easy enough to compute such a group using the variables that we have provided in the database. cheers, -MH -- Michael Harms, Ph.D. --- Conte Center for the

[HCP-Users] Maximal number of unrelated subjects that have complete 3T resting state and task data

2017-06-30 Thread David Hofmann
Hi all, since the final data release is now out, I was wondering what the maximal number of unrelated subjects is, that have complete 3T resting state and task data and if there will be an update on the 100 subjects that can be downloaded so far soon? greetings David

Re: [HCP-Users] Resting State processing

2017-06-30 Thread Glasser, Matthew
You can give MSMSulc and MSMAll a try if you wish using the latest version of the HCP pipelines and the MSM binary, which is here: https://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~ecr05/MSM_HOCR_v2/ Here is the recommended order of pipelines: 1. PreFreeSurfer 2. FreeSurfer 3. PostFreeSurfer (using MSMSulc)

[HCP-Users] Resting State processing

2017-06-30 Thread Fales, Christina L
Hi HCP gurus: I've been trying to adapt the HCP pipeline for use in our group, and having trouble with the tools for resting state processing. The pipeline's Example programs are super helpful for illustrating calls to the minimal preprocessing and the Task-fMRI tools. However the resting-fMRI

Re: [HCP-Users] Questions about reconstruction speed of Multi-band EPI sequence in LSCMRR

2017-06-30 Thread Harms, Michael
We have a more recent (and importable) protocol available here that I would suggest you use as a starting point: http://protocols.humanconnectome.org/CCF/ Your Prisma should already come with GPUs. Are you using the 64 channel coil? That will be a slower recon than the 32 ch coil, but I

Re: [HCP-Users] mapping of ROIs to networks - "posted question"

2017-06-30 Thread Harms, Michael
We’ve run InfoMap on them, but I haven’t had a chance to review them. -- Michael Harms, Ph.D. --- Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders Washington University School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134 660 South

Re: [HCP-Users] How to choose high-pass filter cut-off period for the task data (block design)

2017-06-30 Thread David Hofmann
Thanks, Matthew, I will go with the 200s for all tasks then ;). greetings 2017-06-29 20:56 GMT+02:00 Glasser, Matthew : > We used a sigma of 200s for all tasks. In practice if you clean the data > I doubt it matters whether you do anything more than a linear detrend. > >

Re: [HCP-Users] Questions about reconstruction speed of Multi-band EPI sequence in LSCMRR

2017-06-30 Thread Glasser, Matthew
I believe we use GPUs to speed this up. Peace, Matt. From: > on behalf of HMZ > Date: Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 11:23 PM To:

Re: [HCP-Users] Behavioral performance data

2017-06-30 Thread Kristina Meyer
‚º.¦‡ß‰Çµãß<×o{÷Ÿyë]·ÝÏ6wP¨ž×§µ<©z×±·úej)܅ªìz