Re: [HCP-Users] software to do deterministic tractography

Dear Matt, That's really a great idea! I will try it then. Thanks a lot. By the way, for HCP data probabilistic tractography, are there suggested values for basic parameters like --nsamples, --nsteps, and --steplength ? For example, the dMRI resolution is 1.25mm, and the default --steplength

Re: [HCP-Users] software to do deterministic tractography

You can run with fewer --nsamples multiple runs of probtrackx2 on different computers each with a different --rseed and then combine them afterwards for a full dataset. Peace, Matt. From: Xinyang Liu > Date: Thursday, February 1, 2018 at

Re: [HCP-Users] software to do deterministic tractography

Dear Matt, Sorry I didn't get the point. Could you please explain more in detail? Your suggestion would be very important and helpful to us. Thank you very much. Best regards, Xinyang At 2018-02-01 19:30:12, "Glasser, Matthew" wrote: You can parallelize with fewer

Re: [HCP-Users] software to do deterministic tractography

Dear Matt, Thanks a lot for your suggestion. Actually, probabilistic tractography with FSL was our first choice with HCP data. However, the executing time was too long when we tried to build a global network for single subject with FSL probtrackx2, and we don't know how to run in parallel

[HCP-Users] software to do deterministic tractography

Dear HCP experts, Could you please recommend us some software for the deterministic tractography analysis of HCP data? We are at the beginning to do that and wondering what to choose for the high-quality data. Any suggestions would be very appreciated. Thanks. Best regards, Xinyang Liu