w.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/09/27/193862
>
> Peace,
>
> Matt.
>
> From: <hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org> on behalf of Romuald Janik <
> romuald.ja...@gmail.com>
> Date: Monday, October 16, 2017 at 12:15 PM
> To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org&q
Hi,
I wanted to ask a couple of questions on the sources of noise which can
still interfere with true neural signal in rfMRI HCP data. My main question
is in fact 3) below
1) Are the physiological (cardiac and respiratory) sources regressed out?
It was not completely clear to me in the
Hi,
Just to follow up on your answer and understand better - does the encoding
direction introduce some bias (i.e. I mean some non neural component) into
the signal? If it is necessary to analyze an equal amount of each direction
that means that some effect cancels out? Is it known what it is?
Is
Thanks for the detailed explanations!
I have just one follow up question regarding this point:
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Timothy Coalson wrote:
>
>
> Some techniques like hyperalignment use this "correspondence" concept
> aggressively, and allow you to have
Hi,
I have recently started to look at the HCP single subject rfMRI data and I
have a couple of beginner questions:
1) What is the difference between the various files (I downloaded just the
FIX-compact version) in 100307/MNINonLinear/Results/rfMRI_REST1_LR?
Is the one with MSMAll the most