ifferent --rseed and then combine them afterwards for a
full dataset.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Xinyang Liu <xinyang_ie...@163.com>
Date: Thursday, February 1, 2018 at 5:44 AM
To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu>
Cc: HCP 讨论组 <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] softwar
1, 2018 at 5:44 AM
To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: HCP 讨论组
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] software to do deterministic tractography
Dear Matt,
Sorry I didn't get the
elize with fewer samples and using different random numbers and
then combine after the fact.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Xinyang Liu <xinyang_ie...@163.com>
Date: Thursday, February 1, 2018 at 5:20 AM
To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu>
Cc: HCP 讨论组 <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
Dear Matt,
Thanks a lot for your suggestion. Actually, probabilistic tractography with FSL
was our first choice with HCP data. However, the executing time was too long
when we tried to build a global network for single subject with FSL
probtrackx2, and we don't know how to run in parallel
