On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 08:29AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
> That’s really a question for infrastructure-...@apache.org . They
> manage the ASF build infrastructure which Apache Hadoop and lots of
> other projects utilize. (Bigtop uses something custom, which I think
> is
ing the same.
>
> Thanks
> +Vinod
>
> > On Nov 27, 2015, at 1:54 AM, Steve Loughran <ste...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >
> > well, I'm not going to block it...it doesn't add anything more to the pom
> > dependencies that aren't there right now
>
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 01:51PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
>
> > On 25 Nov 2015, at 02:48, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Vinod, hopefully it isn't too late for a quick fix to be included into 2.7.2
> > (sorry for jumping too late on
=
BTW, we have one or two spots left, so if you didn't make your reservation -
now is the time.
See you all tomorrow.
Cos
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 04:33PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
One more update: it seema that for ppl in SF, who oftentimes might not even
have a car, getting
if you're interested before end of Sunday, 13th.
Cheers,
Cos
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 12:23PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
All,
Re-sending this announcement in case it fell through over the long weekend
when people were away. We still have seats left, so register soon.
Regards,
Cos
All,
Re-sending this announcement in case it fell through over the long weekend
when people were away. We still have seats left, so register soon.
Regards,
Cos
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 06:37PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
We'd like to invite you to the
Consensus based replication
, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
Guys,
In the last a couple of weeks, we had a very good and productive initial round
of discussions on the JIRAs. I think it is worthy to keep the momentum going
and have a more detailed conversation. For that, we'd like to host s Hadoop
developers meetup to get
They are actually listed in the first email on this thread. Here they are:
HADOOP-10641
HDFS-6469
Cos
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:30PM, Sujeet Varakhedi wrote:
Can you point me to the JIRA's
Sujeet
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote
Guys,
In the last a couple of weeks, we had a very good and productive initial round
of discussions on the JIRAs. I think it is worthy to keep the momentum going
and have a more detailed conversation. For that, we'd like to host s Hadoop
developers meetup to get into the bowls of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HDFS-6471.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Release Note: Committed to trunk and merged into branch-2
Do you guys think that committing
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4858
to branch-2.3 is still Ok? It is a small change that bring fixes broken
timeout behavior of DN to NN RPC.
We have been testing this fix on top of 2.0.6 for a long time now and it seems
to be a real help.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HDFS-4600.
--
Resolution: Invalid
The issues seems to be caused by specific cluster configuration
I am clearly +1 (non-binding) on the release.
With 8 +1s (5 binding), no -1s or 0s the vote passes.
Thanks to all who verified the bits, I'll push them out shortly.
Thanks,
Cos
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:29PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
All,
I have created a release candidate (rc1
All,
I have pushed the bits of 2.0.6-alpha into the open and released staging bits
in Nexus. Site is updated with the release news.
2.0.6-alpha is officially live now. Thanks everybody for your help!
Cos
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:09PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
I am clearly +1 (non-binding
to address the NO OK points (specially the last one), they
are trivial.
Thanks.
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
All,
I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.6-alpha that I
would
like to release.
This is a stabilization
.
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
All,
I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.6-alpha that I
would
like to release.
This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of
issues
as outlined on the security list
passes on the RC before publishing
it.
Arun, as you are about to cut the new RC for 2.1.0-beta, can you please
make sure the license headers are used in the releasenotes HTML files?
Thx
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
Alejandro,
looking
All,
I have created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.6-alpha that I would
like to release.
This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of issues
as outlined on the security list.
The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.6-alpha-rc1/
The RC
All,
I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.6-alpha that I would
like to release.
This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of issues
as outlined on the security list.
The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.6-alpha-rc0/
The RC
PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
I have rolled out release candidate (rc2) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha.
The difference between rc1 and rc2 is the optimistic release date is
set for
06/06/2013 in the CHANGES.txt files.
The binary artifact is the same - there's no need to rebuild
Ok, if this the consensus on the issue, then tonight I will cut rc2 with only
CHANGES.txt release dates update. After that I will extend the vote once
again.
Sorry for the hassle to all who did voted before.
Cos
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 12:18AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 9:01
5pm PDT.
Thanks for your patience!
Cos
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 09:27PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
All,
I have created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I would
like to release.
This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of issues
discovered
+1 [non-binding]:
checksums match, builds, and some simple tests are running ok.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:55PM, Thomas Graves wrote:
I've created a release candidate (RC0) for hadoop-0.23.7 that I would like
to release.
This release is a sustaining release with several important bug
good to me.
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Joep
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org
wrote:
Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
and
later. It has been committed as
r1465124
The reason it isn't normally
way to solve it it would be
using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we
are not cutting a new rc for other reason
+1 on rc1
Thx
On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
Alejandro,
I believe this is chicken and egg
and trunk. Am I correct?
Thanks,
Cos
hth,
Arun
On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun
was
cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed the example.
Thanks for your input and help Alejandro
will alter the CHANGES.txt
files
thanks,
Cos
Arun
On Jun 2, 2013, at 6:41 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 03:04PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
I record the 'release date' as the one on which the build is created. Not
sure what Matt actually does on branch-1. Matt
Chris,
with 2.0.5-alpha (rc1) out, would you please take a look at the release bits?
I assume the four-digit numbering scheme issue has been resolved now.
Regards,
Cos
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:18PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org
I changes are completed, I have updated branch-2 and trunk CHANGES.txt files
as planned. Version of the branch-2 is set to 2.1.0-beta; 2.0.5-alpha release
artifacts are deployed to the staging area.
Thanks for your patience, guys!
Cos
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:45PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote
, in branch-2, the version should be 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT.
thanks,
Arun
Thanks.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org
wrote:
I have no issues of changing the version to 2.0.5
All,
I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I would
like to release.
This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of issues
discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
The RC is available at:
, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
Thanks.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
All,
I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I
would
like to release.
This is a stabilization release
that you guys have noted
earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
Cos
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
Alejandro,
thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section in
YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently I didn't get
All,
I have created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I would
like to release.
This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of issues
discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
The RC is available at:
, the
branches are moved and artifact versions seem to be colliding. 2.0.4.x seems
to work well for the stabilization purposes and it will allow to unblock
downstream and integration projects quickly.
Cos
Arun
On May 24, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
All,
I have created
this 2.0.5-alpha?
Good point. Since it contains only backports from branch-2, it would
make sense for it to be an intermediate release.
I shouldn't have to say this, but I'm changing my vote to -1 while we
work this out. -C
On May 24, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
All,
I
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 03:18PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
There's no misunderstanding Chris - this release is to unblock downstream.
As for your question: I don't have a crystal ball; I wish though. I think
versioning, per
HowToReleasePostMavenization#Branchinghttps://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToReleasePostMavenization#Branching,
step 6.
Thanks,
--Matt
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:57AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
I see you
was missing some native libs so 0.17.2.1 was released to fix
that critical issue instead of calling it .3
Exactly the point - the _bigfix_ release. Thanks for pointing out the
similarities.
Cos
J-D
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 05:30PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
There's no plans to release anything else at this point - this is a bug-fix
release, as I pointed out on a numerous occasions. There's no new features -
just 2
a new 2.0.5
version, change the fix version of the 2 JIRAs that make the RC
Thanks.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org
wrote:
I have no issues of changing the version to 2.0.5
All,
I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.4.1-alpha that I would
like to release.
This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of issues
discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
The RC is available at:
-0
the release is missing HADOOP-9704 that has critical effect on downstream
projects e.g. build are affected. The issue has been raised for the first time
back in 4/10/13 http://is.gd/OGb3GG and never been even sneezed upon.
Cos
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 03:26AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
Folks,
'branch-0.22'
# find ./ -name *Conf.xml
./src/test/hdfs/org/apache/hadoop/cli/testHDFSConf.xml
Maybe I'm missing something?
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
I have split CLI test infrastructure into hierarchical pieces that allow to
have
I have split CLI test infrastructure into hierarchical pieces that allow to
have different configurations for different components. E.g. you can have one
for YARN that would exist independently of HDFS, etc. The change has been in
since like 0.22 and committed to 0.203.x as well IIRC, hence should
It doesn't look like any progress has been done on the ticket below in the
last 3 weeks. And now branch-2 can't be compiled because of
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/TestDFSShell.java:[895,15]
WINDOWS is not public in org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path; cannot be
=13612650page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13612650
Regards,
Suresh
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
It doesn't look like any progress has been done on the ticket below in the
last 3 weeks. And now branch-2
node available and that mvn targets are in place. Correct me
if I missed any complications in the process.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
It seems that with the HW in place, the matter of setting at least nightly
build is trivial for anyone with up
It seems that with the HW in place, the matter of setting at least nightly
build is trivial for anyone with up to date Windows knowledge. I wish I could
help. Going without a validation is a recipe for a disaster IMO.
-1 until some reasonable solution is implemented.
Cos
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013
Suresh, I appreciate all the troubles you're going through wrt syncing up the
huge patch for a long time - I really do.
I am not asking to have full test-patch process in place. But I think it is a
real good idea to have a way to run the full test suite once in a while - or
as Konstantin
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 03:08PM, sanjay Radia wrote:
+1
Java has done the bulk of the work in making Hadoop multi-platform.
Windows specific code is a tiny percentage of the code.
Jeninks support for windows is going help us keep the platform portable going
forward.
I expect that the vast
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HDFS-4269.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed to branch-2. Thanks Chris
We've created BigTop stack with 2.0.3 as the base. Ran YCSB, slive, and some
other loads on up to 20 nodes clusters as a part of the release validation.
Two issues were noted:
- due to the known issue with Jetty we are seeing MR jobs hanging here and
there
- without properly configured
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 07:44PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
We've created BigTop stack with 2.0.3 as the base. Ran YCSB, slive, and some
other loads on up to 20 nodes clusters as a part of the release validation.
Two issues were noted:
- due to the known issue with Jetty we are seeing MR jobs
The issue with the configuration is raised (and adressed) in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-841
Cos
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 04:25PM, Aaron T. Myers wrote:
+1 (binding)
I downloaded the src tar ball, built it with the native bits enabled,
started up a little cluster, and ran
I am looking into your log and see this
/usr/bin/build-classpath: error: Could not find jaxp_parser_impl Java
extension for this JVM
/usr/bin/build-classpath: error: Some specified jars were not found
Does it ring a bell?
Cos
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:57PM, Brad Childs wrote:
I'm trying to
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 04:17PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
Hi Todd,
I had said previously that it's worth
discussing if several other people believe the same.
Well let's put it on to general list for discussion then?
Seems to me an important issue for Hadoop evolution in general.
We
TLDR :/
Besides, it isn't a job list
Cos
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:59PM, Bing Li wrote:
国际著名大型IT企业（排名前3位）开发中心招聘Hadoop技术专家（北京）-非猎头
职位描述：
Hadoop系统和平台开发（架构师，资深开发人员）
职位要求：
1.有设计开发大型分布式系统的经验（工作年限3年以上，架构师5年以上），hadoop大型实际应用经验优先
2.良好的编程和调试经验(java or c++/c)，扎实的计算机理论基础，快速的学习能力
3.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HDFS-798.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
People are concerned about some weird side-effects that this fix has
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:25AM, Eli Collins wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Konstantin Shvachko
shv.had...@gmail.com wrote:
Eli,
I went over the entire discussion on the topic, and did not get it. Is
there a problem with append? We know it does not work in hadoop-1,
only
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 03:22PM, Eli Collins wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:25AM, Eli Collins wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Konstantin Shvachko
shv.had...@gmail.com wrote:
Eli,
I went over
Boudnik
Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik
Fix For: 0.22.0
HDFS part of Hadoop-7450
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HDFS-2452.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
I have committed it to branch-0.22
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HDFS-2451.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
I have committed it to 0.22 branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HDFS-1762.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.22.0
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
I have
: Bug
Components: build
Affects Versions: 0.22.0
Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik
Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik
With HDFS-1762 in place testConfCluster.xml needs to be packaged along with
test classes so it can be used for testing on a real cluster.
--
This message
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HDFS-2377.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
This is dup of HDFS-1943
hdfs script reporting
I see that the whole AOP stuff has been taken out along with Herriot work.
I don't see any discussion about this on the JIRA. Neither I don't see any
tickets created to track the effort (but a subtask for FI tests in
HADOOP-7412).
Any reason we are missing a big chunk of validation infrastructure
.
Thanks.
Alejandro
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
I see that the whole AOP stuff has been taken out along with Herriot work.
I don't see any discussion about this on the JIRA. Neither I don't see any
tickets created to track the effort
+1. Having an open QE process would be a tremendous value-add to the
overall quality of the feature. Append was an exemplary development in
this sense. Would it be possible to have Federation test plan (if
exists) to be published along with the specs on the JIRA (similar to
HDFS-265) at least for
Interesting... while the read performance has only marginally improved
4% (still a good thing) the write performance shows significantly
better improvements 10%. Very interesting asymmetry, indeed.
Suresh, what was the size of the cluster in the testing?
Cos
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:02,
Sanjay,
I assume the outlined changes won't an earlier version of HDFS from
upgrads to the federation version, right?
Cos
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 17:26, Sanjay Radia sra...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Changes to the code base
- The fundamental code change is to extend the notion of block id to now
Oops, the message came out garbled. I meant to say
I assume the outlined changes won't prevent an earlier version of HDFS from
upgrades to the federation version, right?
Thanks in advance,
Cos
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 17:59, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
Sanjay,
I assume
/HDFS-1807
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik
Running TestCLI in a real cluster environment I came across a problem where a
regexp like this
{{^-rw-r--r--( )*1( )*[a-z]*( )*supergroup( )*.*}}
doesn't match
{{-rw-r--r-- 1
TestNodeCount is failing with NPE
-
Key: HDFS-1740
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1740
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.23.0
Reporter: Konstantin
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik
Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik
In order to user Sonar facility a project has to be either build by Maven or
has a special pom 'wrapper'. Let's provide a minimal one to allow just that.
--
This message is automatically
: 0.23.0
Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik
Priority: Critical
two test cases were failing for a number of builds (see attached logs)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
I have took a look at the test and I should note that the way they written if
kinda misleading. For instance the message we are seeing in the Hudson says
expected:403 but was:200
where's the reality is that the expected was 200 and actual value was 403.
Basically the order of assert calls is
JIRA has this nice feature called 'Tag'. We've been using this for
Herriot development - seems much cleaner than clogging synopses field
with additional wodking.
--
Take care,
Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 14:53, Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hey folks,
Would
including HDFS Federation. As far as tagging is concerned,
all federation jiras are subtasks of HDFS-1052. Hence some kind of grouping
can be done based on that.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
JIRA has this nice feature called 'Tag'. We've been using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HDFS-1373.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
This is a dup of HDFS-1284.
Some tests fails on hosts w/o
: name-node
Affects Versions: 0.21.0
Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik
NameNode storage restore functionality doesn't work (as HDFS-903 demonstrated).
This needs to be either disabled, or removed, or fixed. This feature also fails
HDFS-1496
--
This message is automatically generated
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Bug
Components: name-node
Affects Versions: 0.21.0
Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik
While investigating failures on HDFS-1602 it became apparent that once a
namenode storage volume is pulled out NN becomes completely sticky
Moving hdfs-dev@ and mapreduce-dev@ to Bcc: to avoid cross-postings.
From what I understand you want to have a test case which demonstrates
that whatever socket/stream connections were opened are properly
closed in case of IOException? I guess one of many possibilities would
be to check if a
That's might be the case. I will take a look at this first thing Monday
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 16:32, Nigel Daley nda...@mac.com wrote:
[junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.hdfsproxy.TestHdfsProxy FAILED
...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HDFS-523.
-
Resolution: Later
This might (or mightn't) be addressed in a later time subject
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HDFS-1552.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.21.1
Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed]
I have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HDFS-1548.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed]
I have committed this to 0.21
/jira/browse/HDFS-1556
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik
Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik
Fix For: 0.21.1
When invoked with {{run-test-hdfs-fault-inject target}} fault injection tests
are getting executed 4 times
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HDFS-1406.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.23.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HDFS-1306.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
Closing as a dup. of HDFS-1286
TestFileAppend4 fails
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HDFS-1502.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.23.0
Federation Branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HDFS-1525.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Closing is dup of HDFS-1527
TestLargeBlock is failing on 32-bit
Versions: 0.22.0
Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik
TestLargeBlock is failing for more than a week not on 0.22 and trunk with
{noformat}
java.io.IOException: Premeture EOF from inputStream
at org.apache.hadoop.io.IOUtils.readFully(IOUtils.java:118
Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik
TestLargeBlock is failing for more than a week not on 0.22 and trunk with
{noformat}
java.io.IOException: Premeture EOF from inputStream
at org.apache.hadoop.io.IOUtils.readFully(IOUtils.java:118)
at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.BlockReader.readChunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HDFS-1503.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.23.0
I have just committed this to trunk
Affects Versions: 0.23.0
Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik
Version HAS to be bumped for system testing framework artifacts (as mentioned
in the build.xml file)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
: build
Affects Versions: 0.23.0
Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik
Version HAS to be bumped for system testing framework artifacts (as mentioned
in the build.xml file)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Sanjay.
the generation of the .classpath file has been a pain-point for everybody
committing the code and making dependecy changes in Hadoop.
Everytime new jar has been added to the project one should've remember to
update Eclipse deps even if that person doesn't use that IDE. Otherwise,
Eclipse
-1486
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik
Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik
HDFS part of HADOOP-7014. HDFS side of TestCLI doesn't require any special
changes but needs to be aligned with Common
--
This message
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
