[jira] [Created] (HDFS-4467) Segmentation fault in libhdfs while connecting to HDFS and running a Hive Query

2013-02-04 Thread Shubhangi Garg (JIRA)
Shubhangi Garg created HDFS-4467: Summary: Segmentation fault in libhdfs while connecting to HDFS and running a Hive Query Key: HDFS-4467 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4467 Project:

Re: Release numbering for branch-2 releases

2013-02-04 Thread Suresh Srinivas
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote: On Feb 1, 2013, at 2:34 AM, Tom White wrote: Whereas Arun is proposing 2.0.0-alpha, 2.0.1-alpha, 2.0.2-alpha, 2.1.0-alpha, 2.2.0-beta, 2.3.0 and the casual observer might expect there to be a stable 2.0.1

Re: Release numbering for branch-2 releases

2013-02-04 Thread Stack
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote: Would it better to have 2.0.3-alpha, 2.0.4-beta and then make 2.1 as a stable release? This way we just have one series (2.0.x) which is not suitable for general consumption. That contains the versioning damage to

Re: Release numbering for branch-2 releases

2013-02-04 Thread Owen O'Malley
I think that using -(alpha,beta) tags on the release versions is a really bad idea. All releases should follow the strictly numeric (Major.Minor.Patch) pattern that we've used for all of the releases except the 2.0.x ones. -- Owen On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-4468) Fix test failure for HADOOP-9252

2013-02-04 Thread Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)
Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE created HDFS-4468: Summary: Fix test failure for HADOOP-9252 Key: HDFS-4468 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4468 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue

Re: Release numbering for branch-2 releases

2013-02-04 Thread Suresh Srinivas
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote: I think that using -(alpha,beta) tags on the release versions is a really bad idea. Why? Can you please share some reasons? I actually think alpha and beta and stable/GA are much better way to set the expectation of the

Re: Release numbering for branch-2 releases

2013-02-04 Thread Todd Lipcon
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Suresh Srinivas sur...@hortonworks.comwrote: Why? Can you please share some reasons? I actually think alpha and beta and stable/GA are much better way to set the expectation of the quality of a release. This has been practiced in software release cycle for a

Re: Release numbering for branch-2 releases

2013-02-04 Thread Steve Loughran
disclaimer, personal opinions only, I just can't be bothered to subscribe with @apache.org right now. On 4 February 2013 14:36, Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com wrote: - Quality/completeness: for example, missing docs, buggy UIs, difficult setup/install, etc par for the course. Have you ever