[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17096321#comment-17096321
]
Akira Ajisaka commented on HDFS-15287:
--
Thanks [~kihwal] for your reply. I read HDFS-15293 and it is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17094722#comment-17094722
]
Chen Liang commented on HDFS-15287:
---
Thanks for the update [~kihwal]. Will follow up on HDFS-15293, the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17094531#comment-17094531
]
Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-15287:
---
[~aajisaka], one problem is resolved on 4/16. Another side-effect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17094527#comment-17094527
]
Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-15287:
---
Thanks for the explanation. It looks like HDFS-15036 was pulled
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17093942#comment-17093942
]
Akira Ajisaka commented on HDFS-15287:
--
Thank [~kihwal] for the report. Given HDFS-15036 is merged
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17091923#comment-17091923
]
Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-15287:
Thanks [~kihwal]. It makes sense now. Looks like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17091752#comment-17091752
]
Chen Liang commented on HDFS-15287:
---
Thanks for the elaboration [~kihwal]. I did some testing in our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17091084#comment-17091084
]
Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-15287:
---
[~shv]. Sorry, I guess I was too terse. Here is what happens. It
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17088926#comment-17088926
]
Chen Liang commented on HDFS-15287:
---
I filed HDFS-15293 to relax the time interval condition. But
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17088909#comment-17088909
]
Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-15287:
Active NameNode checks whether to accept a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17088079#comment-17088079
]
Chen Liang commented on HDFS-15287:
---
In case of roll back image, this check
{code}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17088072#comment-17088072
]
Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-15287:
---
It has nothing to do with observer. The active namenode defaults
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17088045#comment-17088045
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-15287:
Does it require multiple standby namenodes, observer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17087949#comment-17087949
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-15287:
[~cliang] [~shv] could you look into this?
> HDFS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17087739#comment-17087739
]
Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-15287:
---
Even for non RU cases, checkpoints can happen more frequently than
15 matches
Mail list logo
