[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8296) BlockManager.getUnderReplicatedBlocksCount() is not giving correct count if namenode in safe mode.

2015-05-08 Thread surendra singh lilhore (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14535128#comment-14535128 ] surendra singh lilhore commented on HDFS-8296: -- Thanks [~vinayrpet] for

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8296) BlockManager.getUnderReplicatedBlocksCount() is not giving correct count if namenode in safe mode.

2015-05-08 Thread Vinayakumar B (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14534372#comment-14534372 ] Vinayakumar B commented on HDFS-8296: - I think, in the namenode's safemode block stats

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8296) BlockManager.getUnderReplicatedBlocksCount() is not giving correct count if namenode in safe mode.

2015-05-06 Thread surendra singh lilhore (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14530585#comment-14530585 ] surendra singh lilhore commented on HDFS-8296: -- bq. BlockManager.java:1: File

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8296) BlockManager.getUnderReplicatedBlocksCount() is not giving correct count if namenode in safe mode.

2015-05-05 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14528983#comment-14528983 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-8296: - \\ \\ | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8296) BlockManager.getUnderReplicatedBlocksCount() is not giving correct count if namenode in safe mode.

2015-05-03 Thread surendra singh lilhore (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14525979#comment-14525979 ] surendra singh lilhore commented on HDFS-8296: -- I think namenode should update