[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9922) Upgrade Domain placement policy status marks a good block in violation when there are decommissioned nodes

2017-05-02 Thread Andrew Wang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15993672#comment-15993672 ] Andrew Wang commented on HDFS-9922: --- We need to keep the 2.9.0 fix version, since only major and minor

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9922) Upgrade Domain placement policy status marks a good block in violation when there are decommissioned nodes

2017-05-02 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15993580#comment-15993580 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9922: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9922) Upgrade Domain placement policy status marks a good block in violation when there are decommissioned nodes

2017-04-21 Thread Ming Ma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15979473#comment-15979473 ] Ming Ma commented on HDFS-9922: --- Currently upgrade domain isn't considered available in 2.8 due to these

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9922) Upgrade Domain placement policy status marks a good block in violation when there are decommissioned nodes

2017-04-21 Thread Kihwal Lee (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15978923#comment-15978923 ] Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-9922: -- Don't we need this in 2.8? > Upgrade Domain placement policy status

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9922) Upgrade Domain placement policy status marks a good block in violation when there are decommissioned nodes

2016-06-15 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15333114#comment-15333114 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-9922: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #9965 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9922) Upgrade Domain placement policy status marks a good block in violation when there are decommissioned nodes

2016-06-15 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15333044#comment-15333044 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9922: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9922) Upgrade Domain placement policy status marks a good block in violation when there are decommissioned nodes

2016-06-15 Thread Lei (Eddy) Xu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15332655#comment-15332655 ] Lei (Eddy) Xu commented on HDFS-9922: - +1 pending jenkins. Looks good to me. Thanks for the works here,

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9922) Upgrade Domain placement policy status marks a good block in violation when there are decommissioned nodes

2016-06-14 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15330899#comment-15330899 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9922: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9922) Upgrade Domain placement policy status marks a good block in violation when there are decommissioned nodes

2016-06-14 Thread Chris Trezzo (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15330646#comment-15330646 ] Chris Trezzo commented on HDFS-9922: Also, thank you [~mingma] for the review and help on unit tests!

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9922) Upgrade Domain placement policy status marks a good block in violation when there are decommissioned nodes

2016-03-10 Thread Ming Ma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15189448#comment-15189448 ] Ming Ma commented on HDFS-9922: --- Thanks [~ctrezzo]. The patch makes sense. * Based on how it is

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9922) Upgrade Domain placement policy status marks a good block in violation when there are decommissioned nodes

2016-03-08 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15186555#comment-15186555 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9922: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||