Daniel. Do you think we might have time to talk about Unicode
formatting of bi-directional fields? Or perhaps this is too systems-specific
for a catalogers meeting? Jerry Anne raised the question today about whether
the parallel 100 field ought to have a [nun] rather than a b. in
When I attended ALA in Orlando last year I was at the Authority Control in
the Online Environment Interest Group (ACIG) meeting and heard Barbara
Tillett speak on LC's ultimate plan to add non-roman scripts to the
authority file when they came up on the Unicode version of Voyager. I
believe
@lists.acs.ohio-state.edu
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: Agenda for RS Cataloging
Meeting
Daniel. Do you think we might
have time to talk about Unicode formatting of bi-directional fields? Or
perhaps this is too systems-specific for a catalogers meeting? Jerry Anne
raised
]
To:
heb-naco@lists.acs.ohio-state.edu
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: Agenda for RS Cataloging Meeting
Daniel. Do you think we might have time to talk about Unicode formatting
of bi-directional fields? Or perhaps this is too systems-specific
for a catalogers meeting? Jerry Anne
.
Heidi
- Original Message -
From: Caroline R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: heb-naco@lists.acs.ohio-state.edu
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: Agenda for RS Cataloging Meeting
When I attended ALA in Orlando last year I was at the Authority Control in
the Online
includes the Gregorian date andHebrew calendar
date in its various permutations in its bibliographic records.
Heidi
- Original Message -
From:
Yossi Galron
To: heb-naco@lists.acs.ohio-state.edu
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:56
AM
Subject: Re: Agenda for RS
Cataloging
.
| Thoughts? Comments?
|
|
|
|
| - Original Message -
|
| From: Joan C Biella
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| To:
|
| heb-naco@lists.acs.ohio-state.edu
|
| Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:00 AM
|
| Subject: Re: Agenda for RS Cataloging Meeting
|
|
| Daniel. Do you think we might have time
Dear group,
My original concern had to do with getting original script data entered
correctly, such that non-Roman or mixed-script fields, however justified
they may or may not be by the Rules, would nevertheless display correctly
in a Unicode-equipped OPAC. (Thank you to Joan and Caroline for
Dear Heidi and others,
Do you think we might have time to talk about Unicode formatting of
bi-directional fields? Or perhaps this is too systems-specific for a
catalogers meeting? Jerry Anne raised the question today about whether the
parallel 100 field ought to have a [nun] rather than a b.
