Counceil letter sent to LC re SARs
decision
Dear colleagues,
Here is a second attempt at an open letter from AJL. Very interested in
your feedback. Thanks.
Daniel
Dear Director Wiggins,
We are deeply concerned by the decision of the Library of Congress (LC) to
discontinue creation of series
Dear Daniel and Safranim,
I think it is important to point out the uniqueness of materials we catalog
in multiple languages and in Hebrew script. If only descriptive data is to
be keyed in a a 490 0, then there would only be Hebrew script in those
fields, in theory (will parallel romanized
Daniel,
You can write to AJL council members at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nancy
PS: I support AJL's sending a letter to LC and I like your draft.
Dear Safranim,
I realize there may not be concensus on this issue (I read, e.g.,
Sara Spiegel's
thoughtful email this morning, and just now saw the ARL
Dear Daniel and Colleagues,
Thank you for sharing this carefully crafted draft letter. As part of LC
management (although not involved with the final decision on series), I am in
an awkward position with regard to participating in this response to LC.
Nevertheless, as an AJL colleague, I
Yossi--I always forget to copy you when I post to the list! I am resending my
message.
Lenore Bell 06/01/06 11:02 AM
Dear Daniel and Colleagues,
Thank you for sharing this carefully crafted draft letter. As part of LC
management (although not involved with the final decision on series), I
Yossi--I always forget to copy you when I post to the list! I am resending my
message. Thanks!
Lenore Bell 06/01/06 11:02 AM
Dear Daniel and Colleagues,
Thank you for sharing this carefully crafted draft letter. As part of LC
management (although not involved with the final decision on
In the current implementation of the new series policy, LC will continue to
provide parallel roman/non-roman paired 490's. Lenore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/31/06 6:02 PM
Dear Daniel and Safranim,
I think it is important to point out the uniqueness of materials we catalog
in multiple languages
Lenore,
Thanks so much for the detailed feedback.This is very helpful.
I'll try to revise the draft to include your suggested changes.
/ Daniel
At 12:00 PM 6/1/2006, Lenore Bell wrote:
Yossi--I always forget to copy you when I post to the list! I am
resending my message. Thanks!
Lenore
Dear Nancy,
Thank you very much for your support, and for the ajl-council list name.
I'll make some changes suggested by Lenore and Caroline and then resend the
draft to hebnaco and the council.
Daniel
At 07:24 PM 5/31/2006, Nancy Sack wrote:
Daniel,
You can write to AJL council members at
Dear Caroline,
You make an excellent point about non-roman transcription and key word
searching. I'll try to work it into my draft. I'll send it again later
today, and please let me know if I've captured your point adequately.
Daniel
At 06:02 PM 5/31/2006, Caroline R. Miller wrote:
Dear
Lenore,
Thanks for the clarification.
/ Daniel
At 01:19 PM 6/1/2006, Lenore Bell wrote:
In the current implementation of the new series policy, LC will continue
to provide parallel roman/non-roman paired 490's. Lenore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/31/06 6:02 PM
Dear Daniel and Safranim,
I think
Dear Safranim,
I realize there may not be concensus on this issue (I read, e.g., Sara
Spiegel's
thoughtful email this morning, and just now saw the ARL statement in
support of
LC's decision), but I'd still like to propose sending a letter of concern from
AJL (at least the Cataloging
Two questions:
Is there any thought that AJL might prepare a similar letter?
Is there any thought that the PCC may apply for a Federal grant to help it fill
in for cataloging services LC ceases to provide?
Joan
This is not an official communication from the Library of Congress
[EMAIL
-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Heidi Lerner
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; heb-naco@lists.acs.ohio-state.edu
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 10:33 AM
Subject: Fw: Africans Librarians Counceil letter sent to LC re SARs
decision
Dear safranim,
This letter was sent to the Library
14 matches
Mail list logo
