On 1 November 2011 04:19, Robert Carleton wrote:
> I renamed recurse(d) to myrecurse(d) and put it in update.cf.
>
And renaming to something that is clearly not part of cfe is also a very
good idea, I had (still have?) a hard time understanding what was part of
the language and what was not. In
On Oct 31, 2011, at 9:50 AM, Erlend Leganger wrote:
> It works fine, but I think it is more readable if you define it in the same
> file as you use it. Moving it will make it consistent with what you do with
> body perms system and body copy_from mycopy; both of these are defined in
> update.cf
On 31 October 2011 14:31, Robert Carleton wrote:
> Suggest you move "body depth_search recurse" from failsafe.cf into
> update.cf, it is used in update.cf and not in failsafe.cf.
>
>
> body depth_search recurse(d) is defined in both failsafe.cf and
> cfengine_stdlib.cf. The definition in failsaf
On Oct 30, 2011, at 11:25 PM, Erlend Leganger wrote:
> Suggest you move "body depth_search recurse" from failsafe.cf into update.cf,
> it is used in update.cf and not in failsafe.cf.
body depth_search recurse(d) is defined in both failsafe.cf and
cfengine_stdlib.cf. The definition in failsafe.
On 31 October 2011 02:15, Robert Carleton wrote:
> Please let me know if there are any suggestions, comments or questions.
Suggest you move "body depth_search recurse" from failsafe.cf into update.cf,
it is used in update.cf and not in failsafe.cf.
- Erlend
