Christian Christmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:18:56 -0800, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
>
>> You really ought to read this:
>> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
>
> I don't think so. "Smart" people can answer your question from
> my first posting. Sorry, if
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:18:56 -0800, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
> You really ought to read this:
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
I don't think so. "Smart" people can answer your question from
my first posting. Sorry, if you didn't understand them.
> - you didn't post complete c
Christian Christmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> in the previous days I've seen a posting where someone compiled
> his code with
...
> When I compile my code with the same options and execute it,
> I don't get this detailed output with all the addresses. Any
> ideas how to get it?
You really o
h = strchr(pch, ';') :
pch = strchr(pch, '\r')) > 0;
sptr = ++pch)
{
*pch = 0;
cout << sptr << endl;
}
...
When the operator executed the code, he get this debug
output:
% [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/foo$ ./a.out
% Starting
% l=0xbfbfe8a0, pch=
