Hi bill!
> On 29. Oct 2023, at 05:20, bill-auger wrote:
>
...
> i think the highest priority would be to repair or drop anything that is
> broken
> in 3.2.91 as it is now (eg: the gst-browser, the blox browser, etc), even if
> that means yanking GTK entirely; and make a release of what
implementing support for GTK4 is clearly something that should be on the
road-map; but i agree that GTK support should not be a deciding factor for the
project's future - GTK is non-essential - it is the equivalent of the optional
GTK bindings for other languages (python, ruby, etc) - no one would
GNU smalltalk could be useful in a purely command-line oriented way, for
example with the EMACS (Emacs editor) integration which was as far as I
understand it, the concept back in 1990 or so, back in the days of Steve Byrne.
Also the wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Smalltalk
Thanks for the heads up. Do we have any volunteers to re-activate the
development of GNU Smalltalk, move towards GTK4?
> On 27. Sep 2023, at 13:21, bill-auger wrote:
>
> reasons given for removal:
> * no debian maintainer
> * depends on GTK2
> * inactive upstream
>
> For details on the
reasons given for removal:
* no debian maintainer
* depends on GTK2
* inactive upstream
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1049451
On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 14:18:51 +0800 Holger wrote:
> Indeed. We should promote 3.2.91 to 3.3.0 and cope with VisualGST being
> slightly
