On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 03:31:05PM +, Luis L wrote:
> Is it preferable to return super init rather than just have
> it as a statement in the initialization method and allow the
> implicit self to return?
Hi Luis,
I think it is just a matter of style. I would personally not
code
If it's not working with a delay in the main process it sounds like a bug.
What if you put a counter in the main process and print it as well, does
the main process stop too, or is it just the forked process?
Btw, on my Linux machine your original example works the way you expect. I
get the
Hi Quenio,
I can't speak for GNU Smalltalk, but yield in general is a tricky business,
and does often not mean what one might think. A good way of thinking of
yield is: "Hi scheduler, I'm not done yet, but if you have something
important to do, I will yield now". In particular, yield MAY be a
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Holger Freyther wrote:
> Could you try
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/smalltalk.git/commit/?id=72ada189aba0283c551ead16635c1983968080b8?
I have used system libsigsegv libffi and libltdl, because this is what the
Gentoo distribution uses, and their
Hi Bill,
I think the ZeroDivide exception is unrelated, and caused by your gst being
compiled with option -pie (the default in many distros). If so, you would
get the same exception for 0.05 and many other numbers. Try compiling gst
with -no-pie to see if the exception goes away.
/Tommy
Hi,
The float 1e-4 gets too many zeros when printed. This happens on version
3.2.5 and on the current master branch at git://git.sv.gnu.org/smalltalk.git,
on both 32-bit and 64-bit.
Example:
st> x := 1e-4
0.1
st> x+x
0.0002
Kind regards,
Tommy
Hi list,
I just subscribed, and this is my first post to the list.
The class Promise has a bug in printOn:. It is supposed to print '(???)' if
its value is not yet known. A missing return causes it to continue to print
the actual value, which will hang until the value is known. Same problem if
